Ethical considerations during Mpox Outbreak: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Historically, epidemics have been accompanied by the concurrent emergence of stigma, prejudice, and xenophobia. This scoping review aimed to describe and map published research targeting ethical values concerning monkeypox (mpox). In addition, it aimed to understand the research gaps related to mpox associated stigma. METHODS: We comprehensively searched databases (PubMed Central, PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Google Scholar) to identify published literature concerning mpox ethical issues and stigma from May 6, 2022, to February 15, 2023. The key search terms used were "monkeypox", "ethics", "morals", "social stigma", "privacy", "confidentiality", "secrecy", "privilege", "egoism", and "metaethics". This scoping review followed the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005 and was further improved by the recommendations of Levac et al. in 2010. RESULTS: The search strategies employed in the scoping review yielded a total of 454 articles. We analyzed the sources, types, and topics of the retrieved articles/studies. The authors were able to identify 32 studies that met inclusion criteria. Six of the 32 included studies were primary research. The study revealed that the ongoing mpox outbreak is contending with a notable surge in misinformation and societal stigma. It highlights the adverse impacts of stigma and ethical concerns associated with mpox, which can negatively affect people with the disease. CONCLUSION: The study's findings underscore the imperative need to enhance public awareness; involve civil society; and promote collaboration among policymakers, medical communities, and social media platforms. These collective endeavors are crucial for mitigating stigma, averting human-to-human transmission, tackling racism, and dispelling misconceptions associated with the outbreak.

Nerve Sonography in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 6061 Measured Nerves.

Because of the insidious character and variations in presenting symptoms, Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is challenging to diagnose in children. Diagnosis is based on clinical and nerve conduction studies, as well as genetic examination. Therefore, competent nerve imaging techniques and non-invasive alternatives to nerve conduction studies are a necessity, especially in children. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the current evidence and effectiveness of ultrasound in investigating nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) in those with CMT compared with healthy controls and to pool the CSA measurements. We included studies published in international peer-reviewed journals that measured nerve CSA by ultrasound in patients with CMT. We implemented double-arm meta-analyses to compare the mean CSA of nerves between patients with CMT and healthy controls by calculating the pooled mean difference in CSA. Moreover, we performed subgroup analyses by stratifying the studies according to the site of CSA measurement and examined the difference in nerve CSA between CMT1A and other CMT types. The included studies provide measurements of 12 nerve roots and nerves (vagus, C3, C4, C5, C6, greater auricular, phrenic, median, ulnar, fibular, tibial and sural nerves) in 628 patients with CMT and 586 healthy controls with a total of 6061 measured nerves. Meta-analyses of sonographic nerve CSA are provided to express nerve ultrasonography in the diagnosis of CMT patient.