Medical Assistance in Dying: A Point of Care Educational Framework For Attending Physicians.

Issue: Medical assistance in dying (MAID) became legal in Quebec on December 10, 2015, and in the rest of Canada on June 17, 2016. This enabled 6,749 deaths through physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia between December 10, 2015 and October 31, 2018. While the death of a patient is a common experience for medical trainees, those that occur through MAID have unique features related to the methods, the timeline, the intended role of the physician in causing the death, and the request of the patient that initiates the process. These aspects necessitate a distinct approach to MAID medical education. Evidence: Despite the legalization of MAID in a growing number of jurisdictions, there is virtually no literature to guide MAID education in clinical practice. The cumulative evidence regarding the impact of patient death on medical students, residents, and attending physicians suggests a need for supported discussion and debriefing to process and reflect on the emotional experiences that follow patient death. This is especially important with MAID, in which there are unique ethical and psychological issues related to the physician's direct role in causing the death of a patient. There is little published research on the impact such deaths have on physicians who provide MAID, or on others who are indirectly involved. However, there is evidence that learners desire MAID-specific education tailored to their unique needs. Didactic education about the medical and legal domains of MAID alone is insufficient to support learners' needs. Experiential case-based learning with supervisory support has the potential to enhance training in end-of-life care in general, and specifically in MAID. The authors' first clinical experience with a patient requesting MAID on an internal medicine clinical teaching unit (CTU) highlighted gaps in their preparedness to meet the associated professional and personal demands. Reflecting on these perceived gaps, and on the needs of learners identified in the literature on patient death and MAID education, the authors created a framework to guide learning at the point of care of a patient requesting MAID. Represented in a MAID Education Cogwheel and discussion guide, this framework specifies learning objectives and methods in six domains: medical, legal, moral, ethical, cultural, and psychosocial. Implications: Following a MAID request, attending physicians can use the framework to guide learners in ongoing conversations addressing these domains. Inter-professional participation can include such disciplines as psychiatry, palliative care, bioethics, pharmacy, nursing, physical and occupational therapy, social work, and spiritual care. Further research is necessary to test this framework to determine its' feasibility, efficacy, and generalizability.

Resident and attending perceptions of direct observation in internal medicine: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Direct observation is the foundation of assessment and learning in competency-based medical education (CBME). Despite its importance, there is significant uncertainty about how to effectively implement frequent and high-quality direct observation. This is particularly true in specialties where observation of non-procedural skills is highly valued and presents unique challenges. It is therefore important to understand perceptions of direct observation to ensure successful acceptance and implementation. In this study, we explored perceptions of direct observation in internal medicine. METHODS: We interviewed internal medicine attending physicians (n = 9) and residents (n = 8) at the University of Toronto, purposively sampled for diversity. Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, constant comparative analysis was performed to develop a framework to understand perceptions of direct observation on the clinical teaching units. RESULTS: Participants articulated a narrow perception of what constitutes direct observation, in contrast to their own descriptions of skills that were observed. This resulted in the perception that certain valuable skills that participants felt were routinely observed were nonetheless not 'directly observable', such as clinical reasoning, observed through case presentations and patient care discussions. Differentiating direct observation from informal observation led to overestimation of the time and resource requirements needed to enhance direct observation, which contributed to scepticism and lack of engagement related to CBME implementation. CONCLUSIONS: In an internal medicine training programme, perceptions of what constitutes direct observation can lead to under-recognition and hinder acceptance in workplace-based assessment and learning. Our results suggest a reframing of 'direct observation' for residents and attending physicians, by explicitly identifying desired skills in non-procedurally-based specialties. These findings may help CBME-based training programmes improve the process of direct observation, leading to enhanced assessment and learning.