Association of short-term changes in HbA1c with body composition and the importance of muscle maintenance in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between changes in glucose metabolism and body composition in patients with diabetes. METHODS: We included 380 patients with type 2 diabetes, who underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis, in this longitudinal study. Changes in HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) levels and body composition indices were compared between baseline and 6 months. A multivariate analysis was performed to examine the relationship between ΔHbA1c and changes in body composition. RESULTS: HbA1c levels were significantly decreased at 6 months (P < 0.01), but there was no significant change in BMI. A linear multiple regression analysis showed that ΔHbA1c was negatively correlated with changes in muscle mass (ß = -0.18; P = 0.047) and bone mineral content (ß = -0.28; P < 0.001), but there was no significant association between ΔHbA1c levels and a change in body fat percentage. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a limited association between short-term changes in glucose metabolism and changes in body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, interventions aimed at reducing adiposity may not affect glucose metabolism in the short term, while interventions focused on maintaining or enhancing muscle mass and bone mineral content may play an important role in diabetes management.

Determinants of phase angle in Japanese patients with diabetes.

Phase angle, obtained using bioelectrical impedance analysis, non-invasively reflects the whole-body cellular condition and nutritional status and may be helpful as a prognostic factor. Patients with diabetes had a smaller phase angle than healthy subjects. However, the clinical significance of phase angle has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between phase angle and HbA1c in patients with diabetes and the clinical relevance of phase angle. A retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted with Japanese patients with diabetes. Body composition was determined with bioelectrical impedance analysis, and this was used to obtain phase angle. Phase angle was assessed in relation to clinical parameters, body composition parameters, and HbA1c levels. A total of 655 patients were enrolled (400 men and 255 women, aged 57.1 ± 14.8 years, body mass index 25.6 ± 5.2 kg/m2, HbA1c 8.1 ± 1.9%). Even in patients with diabetes, the phase angle was higher in men than in women and did not differ between the types of diabetes. Multiple regression analysis, performed with phase angle as the objective variable, and age, sex, diabetes type, HbA1c, albumin level, and body mass index as explanatory variables, revealed that phase angle was negatively affected by HbA1c (B = - 0.043, 95% Confidence interval: - 0.07 to - 0.02, p < 0.001). HbA1c, age, sex, albumin level, and body mass index were independent determinants of phase angle in participants with diabetes.

Diabetes-related shame among people with type 2 diabetes: an internet-based cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence suggests that diabetes stigma and negative emotions associated with it may impair the quality of life of people with diabetes. Among these psychological distresses, shame is considered the most distressing of all human emotional experiences and may be a condition to which diabetes clinicians should pay attention. This epidemiological study focused on diabetes-related shame and aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetes-related shame, its factors, and its association with psychological indicators. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among people with type 2 diabetes preregistered with a research firm. The questionnaire included experience of diabetes-related shame and demographic data such as age, clinical characteristic measures such as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and psychological indicators, including the WHO Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and Problem Areas In Diabetes-5 (PAID-5). Differences in each indicator between people with diabetes who experienced shame and those who did not were analyzed with the unpaired t-test. As supplemental analysis, binomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the prevalence of diabetes-related shame. RESULTS: Of the 510 participants, 32.9% experienced diabetes-related shame and 17.5% concealed their disease from colleagues or friends. Those who had experienced diabetes-related shame showed significantly lower WHO-5 and higher PAID-5 scores (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was found in HbA1c (p=0.36). Binomial logistic regression revealed that women, young adults, those without a college degree, those with low self-efficacy, and those with a strong sense of financial burden or external pressure were at higher risk of experiencing diabetes-related shame. CONCLUSIONS: Among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetes-related shame was associated with diabetes-specific emotional distress and low psychological well-being. Further research and care development are needed to address diabetes-related shame and improve the quality of life of people with diabetes.