Quadratus Lumborum Block as a Cornerstone for Neonatal Intestinal Surgery Enhanced Recovery (ERAS): A Case Series.

Purpose: Neonates present unique challenges for pediatric surgical teams. To optimize outcomes, it is imperative to standardize perioperative care by using early extubation and multimodal analgesic techniques. The quadratus lumborum (QL) block provides longer duration and superior pain relief than other single-injection abdominal fascial plane techniques. The purpose of this case series was to report our initial experience with QL blocks in neonatal patients treated with intestinal ERAS. Patients and Methods: Ten neonates requiring intestinal surgery at a single tertiary care center who received QL blocks between December 2019 and April 2022 for enhanced recovery were studied. Bilateral QL blocks were performed with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine per side with an adjuvant of 1 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine. Results: Gestational age at birth ranged from 32.2 to 41 weeks. The median age, weight, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at the time of surgery was 5 days [range 7.5 hours, 60 days], 2.84 kg [range 1.5, 4.5], and 3, respectively. Bilateral QL blocks were performed without complications in all patients. Two patients were outside the neonatal range from birth to surgery, but were under 42 weeks gestational age when corrected for prematurity. All patients were extubated with well-controlled pain, and no patient required reintubation within the first 24 hours. Postoperatively, median cumulative morphine equivalents were 0.16 mg/kg [range 0, 0.79] and six patients received scheduled acetaminophen. Morphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered to patients with a modified neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) score greater than or equal to 4, and pain was reassessed 1 hour after administration (Appendix). Conclusion: When developing intestinal ERAS protocols, Bilateral QL blocks may be considered for postoperative analgesia in the neonatal population. Further prospective studies are required to validate this approach in neonates.

Perioperative Autonomic Dysfunction in a Patient With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Case Report.

Autonomic dysfunction can lead to unexpected hemodynamic instability during surgery, and best practices for the perioperative care of patients with this condition are not well-defined. We report the case of a 63-year-old woman with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease who experienced perioperative autonomic dysfunction characterized by severe fluctuations in blood pressure while under spinal anesthesia. However, <1 month later, a second hip surgery performed under general anesthesia with special precautions resulted in an uncomplicated perioperative course, with only mild fluctuations in blood pressure.

Reduction of Nonoperative Time Using the Induction Room, Parallel Processing, and Sugammadex: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: An important variable in the operating room is the nonoperative time (NOT), the time between skin closure on a previous case and skin incision on the following case. Mismanagement of NOT can result in significant financial losses and delays in the operating room (OR) schedule, which can negatively impact efficiency and patient, surgeon, and staff satisfaction. NOT includes general anesthesia induction time (IT), emergence time (ET), and turnover time (TOT), and can be calculated by adding the 3 components. OR efficiency can be increased by applying parallel processing for general anesthesia induction and OR cleaning and reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex to reduce the 3 components of NOT without compromising patient safety. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized study of 111 patients 18 to 75 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III, undergoing surgery requiring general anesthesia and muscle relaxation. Patients were randomly assigned to the control group (traditional linear processing for induction of anesthesia and OR cleaning and neuromuscular blockade reversal with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate) and the active group (parallel processing for induction of anesthesia and OR cleaning and neuromuscular blockade reversal with sugammadex). The primary outcome measured is the difference in the NOT. The secondary outcomes are surgeon and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: NOT was significantly shorter in patients who underwent the parallel processing strategy and received sugammadex compared to the patients in the control group (25.0 [18.0-44.0] vs 48.0 [40.0-64.5] minutes; Cliff' delta = 0.57; P < .001). After excluding the cases in the experimental group that were put into sleep in the OR (ie, the first case of the room), IT, ET, TOT, and NOT were further reduced and remained statistically significantly lower than the control group. Satisfaction scores from surgeons were significantly higher in the active group than in the control group (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the satisfaction scores of patients between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that interventions, such as parallel processing during induction of anesthesia and room cleaning instead of linear processing and the use of the faster-acting sugammadex instead of the combination of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, resulted in shorter IT, ET, TOT, and therefore NOT, in addition to higher surgeon's satisfaction.