Surgical intervention ≤ 24 hours versus > 24 hours after injury for the management of acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy, outcomes, and complications of surgical intervention performed within 24 hours (≤ 24 hours) versus after 24 hours (> 24 hours) in managing acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS). METHODS: Articles pertinent to the study were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment procedures and outcomes according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines. RESULTS: Seven articles comprising 488 patients were included, with 188 (38.5%) patients in the ≤ 24-hour group and 300 (61.5%) in the > 24-hour group. Significant differences were not found between groups in terms of demographic characteristics, injury mechanism, spinal cord compression level, neuroimaging features, and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score at admission. Both groups had a similar approach to surgery and steroid administration. The surgical complication rate was significantly higher in the > 24-hour group (4.5%) compared to the ≤ 24-hour group (1.2%) (p = 0.05). Clinical follow-up duration was similar at 12 months (interquartile range 3-36) for both groups (p > 0.99). The ≤ 24-hour group demonstrated a not statistically significant greater improvement in ASIA motor score, with a mean difference of 12 (95% CI -20.7 to 44.6) compared to the > 24-hour group. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates potential advantages of early (≤ 24 hours) surgery in ATCCS patients, specifically in terms of lower complication rates. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and their clinical implications.

Fluorescence-guided resection of intradural spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intradural spinal tumors present significant challenges due to involvement of critical motor and sensory tracts. Achieving maximal resection while preserving functional tissue is therefore crucial. Fluorescence-guided surgery aims to improve resection accuracy and is well studied for brain tumors, but its efficacy has not been fully assessed for spinal tumors. This meta-analysis aims to delineate the efficacy of fluorescence guidance in intradural spinal tumor resection. The authors performed a systematic review in four databases. We included studies that have utilized fluorescence agents, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) or sodium fluorescein, for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of 12 studies involving 552 patients undergoing fluorescence-guided intradural spinal tumor resection were included. Meningiomas demonstrated a 98% fluorescence rate and were associated with a homogenous florescence pattern; however, astrocytomas had variable fluorescence rate with pooled proportion of 70%. There was no significant difference in gross total resection (GTR) rates between fluorescein and 5-ALA (94% vs 84%, p = .22). Pre-operative contrast enhancement was significantly associated with intraoperative fluorescence with fluorescein. Intramedullary tumors with positive intraoperative fluorescence were significantly associated with higher GTR rates (96% vs 73%, p = .03). Utilizing fluorescence guidance during intradural spinal tumor resection holds promise of improving intraoperative visualization for specific intradural spinal tumors. Meningiomas and ependymomas have the highest fluorescence rates especially with sodium fluorescein; on the other hand, astrocytomas have variable fluorescence rates with no superiority of either agent. Positive fluorescence of intramedullary tumors is associated with a higher degree of resection.