Individual patient data network meta-analysis of mortality effects of implantable cardiac devices.

OBJECTIVE: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronisation therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) and the combination therapy (CRT-D) have been shown to reduce all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy alone in patients with heart failure and reduced EF. Our aim was to synthesise data from major randomised controlled trials to estimate the comparative mortality effects of these devices and how these vary according to patients' characteristics. METHODS: Data from 13 randomised trials (12 638 patients) were provided by medical technology companies. Individual patient data were synthesised using network meta-analysis. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses found CRT-D to be the most effective treatment (reduction in rate of death vs medical therapy: 42% (95% credible interval: 32-50%), followed by ICD (29% (20-37%)) and CRT-P (28% (15-40%)). CRT-D reduced mortality compared with CRT-P (19% (1-33%)) and ICD (18% (7-28%)). QRS duration, left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology, age and gender were included as predictors of benefit in the final adjusted model. In this model, CRT-D reduced mortality in all subgroups (range: 53% (34-66%) to 28% (-1% to 49%)). Patients with QRS duration ≥150 ms, LBBB morphology and female gender benefited more from CRT-P and CRT-D. Men and those <60 years benefited more from ICD. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide estimates for the mortality benefits of device therapy conditional upon multiple patient characteristics. They can be used to estimate an individual patient's expected relative benefit and thus inform shared decision making. Clinical guidelines should discuss age and gender as predictors of device benefits.

Integrated microscopy techniques for comprehensive pathology evaluation of an implantable left atrial pressure sensor.

The safety and efficacy of an implantable left atrial pressure (LAP) monitoring system is being evaluated in a clinical trial setting. Because the number of available specimens from the clinical trial for histopathology analysis is limited, it is beneficial to maximize the usage of each available specimen by relying on integrated microscopy techniques. The aim of this study is to demonstrate how a comprehensive pathology analysis of a single specimen may be reliably achieved using integrated microscopy techniques. Integrated microscopy techniques consisting of high-resolution gross digital photography followed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning, low-vacuum scanning electron microscopy (LVSEM), and microground histology with special stains were applied to the same specimen. Integrated microscopy techniques were applied to eight human specimens. Micro-CT evaluation was beneficial for pinpointing the location and position of the device within the tissue, and for identifying any areas of interest or structural flaws that required additional examination. Usage of LVSEM was reliable in analyzing surface topography and cell type without destroying the integrity of the specimen. Following LVSEM, the specimen remained suitable for embedding in plastic and sectioning for light microscopy, using the positional data gathered from the micro-CT to intersect areas of interest in the slide. Finally, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and methylene blue staining was deployed on the slides with high-resolution results. The integration of multiple techniques on a single specimen maximized the usage of the limited number of available specimens from the clinical trial setting. Additionally, this integrated microscopic evaluation approach was found to have the added benefit of providing greater assurance of the derived conclusions because it was possible to cross-validate the results from multiple tests on the same specimen.

Effects of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure having a narrow QRS Complex enrolled in PROSPECT.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in patients with severe symptomatic heart failure, depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function and a wide QRS complex (>or=120 ms). However, patients with heart failure having a narrow QRS complex might also benefit from CRT. DESIGN SETTING PATIENTS INTERVENTIONS: During the Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (PROSPECT) trial, 41 patients were enrolled in a 'narrow' QRS sub-study. These patients had a QRS complex <130 ms, but documented evidence of mechanical dyssynchrony by any of seven pre-defined echocardiographic measures. RESULTS: After 6 months of CRT, 26 (63.4%) patients showed improvement according to the Clinical Composite Score, 4 (9.8%) remained unchanged and 11 (26.8%) worsened. In patients with paired data, the 6-min walking distance increased from 334+/-118 m to 382+/-128 m, (p=0.003) and quality-of-life score improved from 44.2+/-19.7 to 26.8+/-20.2 (p<0.0001). Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in LV end-systolic diameter (from 59+/-9 to 55+/-12 mm, p=0.002) and in LV end-diastolic diameter (from 67+/-9 to 63+/-11 mm, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that CRT may have a beneficial effect in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex and mechanical dyssynchrony as assessed by echocardiography. The majority of patients improved on clinical symptoms, and there was an evident reduction in LV diameters. Larger studies are needed to clearly define selection criteria for CRT in patients with a narrow QRS complex.

Cardiac resynchronisation for patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction -- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials generally suggest that cardiac resynchronisation improves outcomes in patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction and cardiac dyssynchrony. Our objective was to provide a valid synthesis of the effects of CRT on mortality, major morbidity, quality of life and implantation success rates. METHODS: Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomised trials, both blinded and open, comparing cardiac resynchronisation with control. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included hospitalisation for worsening heart failure, quality of life and implantation success rates. RESULTS: We identified 8 randomised trials which included 3380 patients and observed a total of 524 deaths. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to a mean of 29.4 months. Most trials were of high quality, with centrally administered randomisation and few patients lost to follow-up. CRT reduced mortality in these trials (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.88). In addition CRT reduced hospitalisation for worsening heart failure (odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.68) and improved quality of life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (weighted mean difference -7.1, 95% CI -2.9 to -11.4). Implantation success rates in the trials were 87% or greater. CONCLUSION: Cardiac resynchronisation in patients with heart failure characterised by dyssynchrony substantially reduces all-cause mortality, major morbidity and improves quality of life.

Effect of baseline or changes in adrenergic activity on clinical outcomes in the beta-blocker evaluation of survival trial.

BACKGROUND: Adrenergic activation is thought to be an important determinant of outcome in subjects with chronic heart failure (CHF), but baseline or serial changes in adrenergic activity have not been previously investigated in a large patient sample treated with a powerful antiadrenergic agent. METHODS AND RESULTS: Systemic venous norepinephrine was measured at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months in the beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST), which compared placebo treatment with the beta-blocker/sympatholytic agent bucindolol. Baseline norepinephrine level was associated with a progressive increase in rates of death or death plus CHF hospitalization that was independent of treatment group. On multivariate analysis, baseline norepinephrine was also a highly significant (P<0.001) independent predictor of death. In contrast, the relation of the change in norepinephrine at 3 months to subsequent clinical outcomes was complex and treatment group-dependent. In the placebo-treated group but not in the bucindolol-treated group, marked norepinephrine increase at 3 months was associated with increased subsequent risks of death or death plus CHF hospitalization. In the bucindolol-treated group but not in the placebo-treated group, the 1st quartile of marked norepinephrine reduction was associated with an increased mortality risk. A likelihood-based method indicated that 18% of the bucindolol group but only 1% of the placebo group were at an increased risk for death related to marked reduction in norepinephrine at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In BEST, a subset of patients treated with bucindolol had an increased risk of death as the result of sympatholysis, which compromised the efficacy of this third-generation beta-blocker.

Coordinate changes in Myosin heavy chain isoform gene expression are selectively associated with alterations in dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype.

BACKGROUND: The most common cause of chronic heart failure in the US is secondary or primary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The DCM phenotype exhibits changes in the expression of genes that regulate contractile function and pathologic hypertrophy. However, it is unclear if any of these alterations in gene expression are disease producing or modifying. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One approach to providing evidence for cause-effect of a disease-influencing gene is to quantitatively compare changes in phenotype to changes in gene expression by employing serial measurements in a longitudinal experimental design. We investigated the quantitative relationships between changes in gene expression and phenotype n 47 patients with idiopathic DCM. In endomyocardial biopsies at baseline and 6 months later, we measured mRNA expression of genes regulating contractile function (beta-adrenergic receptors, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2) + ATPase, and alpha- and beta-myosin heavy chain isoforms) or associated with pathologic hypertrophy (beta-myosin heavy chain and atrial natriuretic peptide), plus beta-adrenergic receptor protein expression. Left ventricular phenotype was assessed by radionuclide ejection fraction. RESULTS: Improvement in DCM phenotype was directly related to a coordinate increase in alpha- and a decrease in beta-myosin heavy chain mRNA expression. In contrast, modification of phenotype was unrelated to changes in the expression of beta(1)- or beta(2)-adrenergic receptor mRNA or protein, or to the mRNA expression of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2) + ATPase and atrial natriuretic peptide. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in human DCM, phenotypic modification is selectively associated with myosin heavy chain isoform changes. These data support the hypothesis that myosin heavy chain isoform changes contribute to disease progression in human DCM.

Medical management of mild-to-moderate heart failure before the advent of beta blockers.

Clinical trials of beta blockers in heart failure have generally required that patients be receiving optimal drug therapy before randomization to the study medication. Therefore, because beta blockers are used in addition to conventional drug therapy, review of the standard drug therapy of mild-to-moderate heart failure before the advent of beta blockade is essential to understanding the role of beta blockers in the treatment of heart failure. The conventional medical management of systolic heart failure includes angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which should be used as first-line therapy; diuretics, for the management of body fluid-volume excess; digoxin; and some other vasodilators. These therapies have been evaluated in large-scale, randomized, controlled trials. ACE inhibitors have been shown to significantly attenuate disease progression and improve outcome (ie, morbidity and mortality) in patients with mild-to-moderate systolic heart failure. Controversial or unproven therapies include nonglycoside inotropic agents, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, antiarrhythmic agents, anticoagulants, and calcium channel blockers. The pharmacologic management of diastolic heart failure is largely empirical and is directed at reducing symptoms. Symptoms caused by increased ventricular filling pressures may be treated with diuretics and long-acting nitrates. Some calcium channel blockers and most beta blockers prolong diastolic filling time by slowing heart rate, thereby potentially improving the symptoms of diastolic heart failure. Calcium antagonists, beta blockers, diuretics, and ACE inhibitors may also promote regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and thus improve ventricular compliance, possibly preventing the development of diastolic dysfunction. Because randomized controlled trials of diastolic heart failure are lacking, this review focuses on the conventional management of mild-to-moderate systolic heart failure before the advent of beta blockade.

Predicting response to carvedilol for the treatment of heart failure: a multivariate retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Carvedilol has been shown to decrease the progression of heart failure and improve left ventricular function and survival in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%. However, not all patients respond uniformly to this therapy. We proposed to identify variables that could, potentially, be used to predict response to carvedilol therapy as measured by the change in LVEF after treatment (Delta LVEF), and to identify pretreatment variables associated with hospitalization for heart failure after carvedilol therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of 98 patients treated with open-label carvedilol for a mean period of 16 months was performed by using bivariate and step-wise multivariate analyses. Bivariate analysis showed a positive correlation of Delta LVEF with heart rate at baseline (P =.001). There was a negative correlation of Delta LVEF with baseline LVEF (P <.01), diabetes mellitus (P =.04), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (P =.0002). Multivariate analysis showed a positive correlation of Delta LVEF with heart rate at baseline (P =.01) and a negative correlation with initial LVEF (P =.02) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (P =.006). Variables associated with hospitalization after initiation of carvedilol therapy were New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (P =.001), lower extremity edema (P =.001), presence of an S3 (P =.02), hyponatremia (P =.02), elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (P =.002), atrial fibrillation (P =.001), diabetes mellitus (P =.02), and obstructive sleep apnea (P =.009). CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients with the lowest LVEF or the highest heart rate at baseline had the greatest gain in LVEF after treatment with carvedilol. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy derived less benefit. Patients with clinical evidence of decompensated heart failure were at greater risk for hospitalization after initiation of carvedilol therapy.

Interactions between phospholamban and beta-adrenergic drive may lead to cardiomyopathy and early mortality.

BACKGROUND: Relieving the inhibition of sarcoplasmic reticular function by phospholamban is a major target of beta-adrenergic stimulation. Chronic beta-adrenergic receptor activity has been suggested to be detrimental, on the basis of transgenic overexpression of the receptor or its signaling effectors. However, it is not known whether physiological levels of sympathetic tone, in the absence of preexisting heart failure, are similarly detrimental. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transgenic mice overexpressing phospholamban at 4-fold normal levels were generated, and at 3 months, they exhibited mildly depressed ventricular contractility without heart failure. As expected, transgenic cardiomyocyte mechanics and calcium kinetics were depressed, but isoproterenol reversed the inhibitory effects of phospholamban on these parameters. In vivo cardiac function was substantially depressed by propranolol administration, suggesting enhanced sympathetic tone. Indeed, plasma norepinephrine levels and the phosphorylation status of phospholamban were elevated, reflecting increased adrenergic drive in transgenic hearts. On aging, the chronic enhancement of adrenergic tone was associated with a desensitization of adenylyl cyclase (which intensified the inhibitory effects of phospholamban), the development of overt heart failure, and a premature mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The unique interaction between phospholamban and increased adrenergic drive, elucidated herein, provides the first evidence that compensatory increases in catecholamine stimulation can, even in the absence of preexisting heart failure, be a primary causative factor in the development of cardiomyopathy and early mortality.

Evaluation and management of acutely decompensated chronic heart failure in the emergency department.

A wide range of patients with symptomatic heart failure seek treatment in the emergency department. While there is no single approach to the diversity of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure, certain overarching principles apply. For patients with acute pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock, the first priority must be rapid stabilization and treatment of reversible problems. For patients with less dramatic presentations, a more systematic search for precipitating factors may be required. Therapy, in general, is directed at reversing dyspnea and/or hypoxemia caused by pulmonary edema, improving systemic perfusion, and reducing myocardial oxygen demand. While morphine and diuretics still have their traditional roles, vasodilators and inotropic agents play an increasingly important part in the modern pharmacologic approach to decompensated heart failure in the emergency department. After evaluation and stabilization in the emergency department, most patients will require hospital admission, although a subset of low-risk patients may be appropriate for discharge to home following a period of observation. Strategies to optimize emergency department care are likely to have an impact upon patient outcomes and upon resource utilization. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.

Pathophysiology and clinical spectrum of acute congestive heart failure.

This article reviews the current understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical spectrum of heart failure. A cascade of hemodynamic and neurohormonal derangements result from a decrease in ventricular performance or cardiac output. Because neurohormonal activation has become a target for intervention in heart failure, the role of selected systems (sympathetic nervous, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone) and of natriuretic peptides is detailed. The spectrum (from compensated to acute decompensated) within which congestive heart failure patients present is reviewed, with special attention paid to the intermediate, transitional group of patients, who pose unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Given these variable presentations, there is an obligation to tailor therapy accordingly.

Insights into pathogenesis and treatment of cytokines in cardiomyopathy.

Our understanding of the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure is rapidly expanding. recent investigations suggest a role for various proinflammatory and vasoconstrictive cytokines in the development and progression of the disease. In particular, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interlukin-6, and endothelin have all been implicated in heart failure desease progression. These cytokines appear to be activated in response to a remodeling, induction of programmed cell death, neurohormonal activation, and hemodynamics, these agents cause a variety of deleterious effects in the setting of ventricular dysfunction. Investigational inhibitors and antagonists of these substances show promise for the future treatment of heart failure.

Rationale, design, and methods for a Coreg (carvedilol) Heart Failure Registry (COHERE). COHERE Participant Physicians.

BACKGROUND: The success of beta-blocking agents in clinical trials of heart failure (HF) has led to a widespread call for their increased use, which assumes these agents will perform as well in the usual care setting. Given the traditional contraindication of the use of beta-blocking agents in HF, and their perception as difficult to use in HF, observing how they perform in the usual care setting could be critical in accelerating their widespread application. Carvedilol is the only beta-blocking agent currently approved in the United States for use in HF. METHODS: The Coreg (brand of carvedilol; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA) Heart Failure Registry (COHERE) is intended to collect data on outcomes and other clinical variables in a typical HF population and to observe experience with carvedilol in the hands of community practitioners. COHERE does not include any specific patient selection or exclusion criteria. The decision to use carvedilol is entirely at the discretion of the participant physician, based on evidence of HF as judged by assessments the practitioner usually uses. All patients will be followed for 1 year, with information on outcomes and other clinical variables collected and analyzed at baseline, the end of titration, and at 6 and 12 months after reaching the maximum tolerated dose. About 600 participant physicians selected to be as representative as possible of the community practice setting will enroll approximately 6,000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: COHERE will be the first and largest prospective observational experience with a new treatment, ie, carvedilol, in patients with HF managed in the usual care setting and should provide valuable information about this new treatment in this environment compared with the more rigid clinical trials setting.

Intravenous nesiritide, a natriuretic peptide, in the treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure. Nesiritide Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous infusion of nesiritide, a brain (B-type) natriuretic peptide, has beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure. We investigated the clinical use of nesiritide in such patients. METHODS: Patients hospitalized because of symptomatic congestive heart failure were enrolled in either an efficacy trial or a comparative trial. In the efficacy trial, which required the placement of a Swan-Ganz catheter, 127 patients with a pulmonary-capillary wedge pressure of 18 mm Hg or higher and a cardiac index of 2.7 liters per minute per square meter of body-surface area or less were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo or nesiritide (infused at a rate of 0.015 or 0.030 microg per kilogram of body weight per minute) for six hours. In the comparative trial, which did not require hemodynamic monitoring, 305 patients were randomly assigned to open-label therapy with standard agents or nesiritide for up to seven days. RESULTS: In the efficacy trial, at six hours, nesiritide infusion at rates of 0.015 and 0.030 microg per kilogram per minute decreased pulmonary-capillary wedge pressure by 6.0 and 9.6 mm Hg, respectively (as compared with an increase of 2.0 mm Hg with placebo, P<0.001), resulted in improvements in global clinical status in 60 percent and 67 percent of the patients (as compared with 14 percent of those receiving placebo, P<0.001), reduced dyspnea in 57 percent and 53 percent of the patients (as compared with 12 percent of those receiving placebo, P<0.001), and reduced fatigue in 32 percent and 38 percent of the patients (as compared with 5 percent of those receiving placebo, P<0.001). In the comparative trial, the improvements in global clinical status, dyspnea, and fatigue were sustained with nesiritide therapy for up to seven days and were similar to those observed with standard intravenous therapy for heart failure. The most common side effect was dose-related hypotension, which was usually asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized with decompensated congestive heart failure, nesiritide improves hemodynamic function and clinical status. Nesiritide is useful for the treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure.

Beta-blockers: the new standard of therapy for mild heart failure.

Many physicians are reluctant to prescribe beta-blockers to patients with mild heart failure, especially when standard therapy (diuretics and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, with or without digitalis glycosides) seems to be effective at relieving symptoms. However, current first-line medications for heart failure either ignore or incompletely inhibit adrenergic activation, one of the primary contributors to progressive left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Thus, even effective standard "triple" therapy does not safeguard the patient against further catastrophic deterioration of cardiac performance. Clinical trials have shown that the use of beta-blockers in addition to standard therapy improves left ventricular function, reduces hospitalizations, and-in the cases of bisoprolol, long-acting metoprolol, and carvedilol-improves survival in patients with chronic heart failure. In addition, carvedilol has been found to significantly slow disease progression even in mildly symptomatic patients. Though achieving beta-blockade in patients with heart failure requires extra effort by the clinician (appropriate patient selection, optimization of background therapy, initiating drug treatment at low doses, and titrating slowly with careful vigilance for early signs of clinical instability), the cost is small compared with the consequence of postponing adrenergic intervention. The educational objective of this article is to provide the primary care physician with a review of the current understanding of the pathophysiological characteristics underlying chronic systolic heart failure, the clinical benefits of administering beta-blockers during the early stages of heart failure, and the practical considerations of initiating therapy.

Therapy of heart failure.

The incidence and prevalence of heart failure is on the rise. It has become the single most expensive health care item in the United States and the number one discharge diagnosis in the elderly. The goals of therapy include both prevention and treatment of heart failure. In recent years research studies and randomized clinical trials have revolutionized the understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of this disease. This article focuses on the medical management of chronic systolic heart failure based on the pathophysiology of the disease. Systolic heart failure is characterized by a decrease in left ventricular function and cardiac output, which results in activation of several neurohormonal compensatory systems. The long term effects of this neurohormonal activation leads to further deterioration of cardiac function. The use of hydralazine and nitrates to reduce the systemic vascular resistance was the first to show an improvement in mortality and morbidity. Then angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, by inhibiting the renin angiotensin system, demonstrated a greater improvement in mortality and morbidity. More recently the inhibition of the sympathetic stimulation with beta-blockers has been shown to have an additive effect on morbidity and mortality in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Digoxin and diuretics remain important for improving symptoms and decreasing hospitalizations but have not been shown to decrease mortality. The most recent advance in the treatment of cardiac failure is the demonstration that the aldosterone antagonists, spironolactone decreases morbidity and mortality.

Polymorphisms of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor determine exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.

The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) exists in multiple polymorphic forms with different characteristics. Their relevance to heart failure (HF) physiology is unknown. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed on 232 compensated HF patients with a defined beta(2)AR genotype. Patients with the uncommon Ile164 polymorphism had a lower peak VO(2) (15.0+/-0.9 mL. kg(-1). min(-1)) than did patients with Thr164 (17.9+/-0.9 mL. kg(-1). min(-1), P<0.0001). The percentage achieved of predicted peak VO(2) was also lower in patients with Ile164 (62. 3+/-4.5% versus 71.5+/-5.1%, P=0.045). The relative risk of a patient having a VO(2)

Alterations in Ca2+ cycling proteins and G alpha q signaling after left ventricular assist device support in failing human hearts.

OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular assist device support mechanically unloads the failing ventricle with resultant improvement in cardiac geometry and function in patients with end-stage heart failure. Activation of the G alpha q signaling pathway, including protein kinase C, appears to be involved in the progression of heart failure. Similarly down-regulation of Ca2+ cycling proteins may contribute to contractile depression in this clinical syndrome. Thus we examined whether protein kinase C activation and decreased Ca2+ cycling protein levels could be reversed by left ventricular assist device support. METHODS: Left ventricular myocardial specimens were obtained from seven patients during placement of left ventricular assist device and heart transplantation. We examined changes in protein levels of G alpha q, phospholipase C beta 1, regulators of G protein signaling (RGS), sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase, phospholamban and translocation of protein kinase C isoforms (alpha, beta 1, and beta 2). RESULTS: The paired pre- and post-left ventricular assist device samples revealed that RGS2, a selective inhibitor of G alpha q, was decreased (P < 0.01), while the status of G alpha q, phospholipase C beta 1, RGS3 and RGS4 were unchanged after left ventricular assist device implantation. Translocation of protein kinase C isoforms remained unchanged. Left ventricular assist device support increased sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase protein level (P < 0.01), while phospholamban abundance was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that altered protein expression and stoichiometry of the major cardiomyocyte Ca2+ cycling proteins rather than reduced phospholipase C beta 1 activation may contribute to improved mechanical function produced by left ventricular assist device support in human heart failure.

Alterations in adrenergic receptor signaling in heart failure.

In the failing heart, several changes occur in cardiac adrenergic receptor-signal transduction pathways. The most striking of these changes occur in beta-ARs, and of the changes in beta-adrenergic receptors, beta1-receptor down-regulation is the most prominent. Other changes include uncoupling of beta2-adrenergic receptors and increased activity of the inhibitory G-protein, Gi. Most of these changes appear to be related to increased activity of the adrenergic nervous system, i.e. increased exposure to norepinephrine. Antagonists of the adrenergic nervous system improve left ventricular function and outcome in patients with heart failure. This fact supports the notion that activation of these neurohormonal systems exerts a net long-term detrimental effect on the natural history of chronic heart failure and that myocardial adrenergic desensitization phenomena are at least partially adaptive in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction.

New developments in heart failure: role of endothelin and the use of endothelin receptor antagonists.

Despite conventional therapy, there is still much room for improvement in the prognosis of patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Evidence supports a role for endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor, in the pathophysiology of heart failure. Given its potentially deleterious effects, the optimal treatment of heart failure may need to include efforts directed toward antagonizing this hormone. In support of this notion, the use of ET receptor antagonists produces a number of beneficial effects in heart failure, including both improvements in hemodynamics and reductions in the levels of other vasoconstricting neurohormones. There are at least 2 receptors for ET-1 (the ET-A and ET-B receptor), and the effects of ET-1 binding differ depending on the receptor involved. It is still unclear whether blockade of the ET-A receptor alone or the combined blockade of both the ET-A and ET-B receptors will be most efficacious as a therapeutic strategy. Long-term benefits have been achieved with the use of a mixed ET-A/B receptor antagonist, when added to standard triple-drug therapy, in patients with severe heart failure. We await the results of ongoing trials to determine if these agents will fulfill the promise of adding substantial incremental benefit to the treatment of the disease.