Fatigue among anaesthesiologists in Europe: Findings from a joint EBA/NASC survey.

BACKGROUND: Anaesthesiologists deliver an increasing amount of patient care and often work long hours in operating theatres and intensive care units, with frequent on-calls and insufficient rest in between. In the long term, this will negatively influence mental and physical health and well being. As fatigue becomes more prevalent, this has predictable implications for patient safety and clinical effectiveness. 1. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, severity, causes and implications of work-related fatigue amongst specialist anaesthesiologists. DESIGN: An online survey of specialist anaesthesiologists. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was sent to anaesthesiologists in 42 European countries by electronic mail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses from a 36-item online survey assessed work-related fatigue and its impact on anaesthesiologists in European countries. RESULTS: Work-related fatigue was experienced in 91.6% of the 1508 respondents from 32 European countries. Fatigue was caused by their working patterns, clinical and nonclinical workloads, staffing issues and excessive work hours. Over 70% reported that work-related fatigue negatively impacted on their physical and mental health, emotional well being and safe commuting. Most respondents did not feel supported by their organisation to maintain good health and well being. CONCLUSION: Work-related fatigue is a significant and widespread problem amongst anaesthesiologists. More education and increased awareness of fatigue and its adverse effects on patient safety, staff well being and physical and mental health are needed. Departments should ensure that their rotas and job plans comply with the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) and introduce a fatigue risk management system to mitigate the effects of fatigue.

Critical care echocardiography: barriers, competencies and solutions. A survey of over 600 participants.

INTRODUCTION: Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is at the core of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and although a list of the necessary competencies has been created, most European countries do not have established training programmes to allow intensivists to gain such competencies. To address barriers to the implementation of CCE, we conducted an online European survey, and analysed the current barriers to this with the aim of providing novel, modern solutions to them including environmental considerations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 23-item survey was distributed via email with support from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national societies, and social media. Questions focused on bedside CCE prevalence, competencies, and barriers to its implementation. An additional questionnaire was sent to recognised experts in the field of CCE. RESULTS: A total of 644 responses were recorded. Most respondents were anaesthesia and intensive care physicians [79% ( n = 468)], and younger, with 56% in their first five years after specialization ( n = 358). Most respondents [92% ( n = 594)] had access to an ultrasound machine with a cardiac probe, and 97% ( n = 623) reported being able to acquire basic CCE windows. The most common barriers identified by respondents to the implementation of CCE in practice were a lack of sufficient experience/skill [64% ( n = 343)], absence of formal qualifications [46% ( n = 246)] and lack of a mentor [45% ( n = 243)]. Twenty-eight experts responded and identified a lack of allocated time for teaching as a main barrier [60% ( n = 17)]. CONCLUSIONS: We found that bedside CCE is perceived as a crucial skill for intensive care medicine, especially by younger physicians; however, there remain several obstacles to training and implementation. The most important impediments reported by respondents were inadequate training, absence of formal qualifications and difficulties in finding a suitable mentor.

Fatigue amongst anaesthesiology and intensive care trainees in Europe: A matter of concern.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing awareness of the effects of fatigue on trainee wellbeing and health. Trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care work long hours, switching work schedules frequently with insufficient rest. This may have unwanted long-term effects on mental and physical health and emotional well being, resulting in burnout and affecting patient safety. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, severity, causes and effects of work-related fatigue in trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care. DESIGN: Online survey of trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care. SETTINGS: A total of 31 countries within Europe were included in the survey. PARTICIPANTS: European anaesthesiology and intensive care trainees who responded to an invitation to take part by electronic mail or through social media. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses from a 29-item online survey to assess the realities within European countries with regards to work-related fatigue. RESULTS: One thousand and two hundred trainees from 31 European countries answered the survey demonstrating that an alarming number of trainees were fatigued by their working patterns and night shifts. Trainees reported effects on personal well being, safe commuting and potential for clinical errors. Respondents described a lack of support from hospitals and management for recovery during and after night shifts. CONCLUSION: Fatigue among trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care has a significant impact on their well being and potentially, on the incidence of clinical errors. Current measures from authorities and hospital management are not sufficient to prevent serious fatigue, and therefore a fatigue risk management system should be considered. Failure to address this issue might lead to a further decline in trainees' wellbeing, their capacity to work in the speciality in the future, and potentially increase patient care errors.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Risk Perception, Behaviour and Preventive Measures at Schools in Berlin, Germany, during the Early Post-Lockdown Phase: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Briefly before the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Berlin, Germany, schools closed in mid-March 2020. Following re-opening, schools resumed operation at a reduced level for nine weeks. During this phase, we aimed at assessing, among students and teachers, infection status, symptoms, individual behaviour, and institutional infection prevention measures. Twenty-four primary and secondary school classes, randomly selected across Berlin, were examined. Oro-nasopharyngeal swabs and capillary blood samples were collected to determine SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR) and specific IgG (ELISA), respectively. Medical history, household characteristics, leisure activities, fear of infection, risk perception, hand hygiene, facemask wearing, and institutional preventive measures were assessed. Descriptive analysis was performed. Among 535 participants (385 students, 150 staff), one teenager was found to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 (0.2%), and seven individuals exhibited specific IgG (1.3%). Compared to pre-pandemic times, screen time (e.g., TV, gaming, social media) increased, and the majority of primary school students reported reduced physical activity (42.2%). Fear of infection and risk perception were relatively low, acceptance of adapted health behaviors was high. In this post-lockdown period of low SARS-CoV-2 incidence in Berlin, individual and school-level infection prevention measures were largely adhered to. Nevertheless, vigilance and continued preventive measures are essential to cope with future pandemic activity.