Pilot study of women's perspectives when abnormal uterine bleeding occurs during perimenopause.

OBJECTIVE: We gained insights into women's experiences and knowledge about the occurrence of vaginal bleeding during perimenopause requiring evaluation. METHODS: Qualitative inquiry was chosen to explore topics in greater depth to understand individuals' experiences. Interviews with individuals were chosen due to the sensitive nature of gynecologic symptoms and management. Interviews were completed following gynecologic care to explore individuals' experiences with the evaluation and management of vaginal bleeding during perimenopause. RESULTS: Twelve individuals were interviewed between December 2019 and March 2020. Patient uncertainty about the medical significance of developing vaginal bleeding during perimenopause was associated with self-appraisal and gathering information from multiple sources. This experience of seeking evaluation and treatment resulted in varying degrees of trust concerning information received within or outside the clinic. Regarding new technologies that could replace the current invasive tests performed for diagnosis (i.e. ultrasound, hysteroscopy and biopsy), most women preferred the smartphone app and tampon home collection option. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of irregular or heavy vaginal bleeding during perimenopause is fraught with ambiguity, feelings of uncertainty about how to make sense of symptoms and inevitably begins with a period of self-appraisal.

Minimally disruptive medicine: the evidence and conceptual progress supporting a new era of healthcare.

Patients with chronic conditions or multimorbidity, and often their caregivers, have to adjust their lives and mobilise their capacity (ability) to respond to the workload (demands) imposed by treatments and the care of their conditions. There is a continuous and complex interaction between workload and capacity. When capacity proves insufficient to address the treatment workload, creating a burden, patients may place a lower priority on other aspects of their lives, or reduce engagement with healthcare. Guidelines usually focus on disease-centred outcomes without consideration of limited capacity or demanding workload (burden) from treatment regimens. It seems reasonable to consider that healthcare needs reshaping so that care that pursues goals important to patients as well as those suggested by evidence-based medicine. This can be achieved by using shared decision approaches guided by the expertise of clinicians to deliver optimal care while minimising the burden of treatment on patients, their caregivers, and the healthcare system. What we need is minimally disruptive medicine.