Healthcare Workers' Adherence and Attitudes Toward the Adherence to COVID-19 Precautionary Guidelines Post-Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) have shown increased adherence to infection control practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is a need to assess their adherence to and attitude toward COVID-19 guidelines after being vaccinated. The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the adherence to and attitudes toward the adherence to COVID-19 guidelines among HCWs who have been vaccinated. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional design was employed. One hundred and eight participants were recruited via email from a medical center in the Midwest United States. The participants completed online surveys measuring the level of adherence to and attitudes toward the adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. The response rate was 5.4%. FINDINGS: Most participants were female (73.1%) and white (82.4%). The participants adhered to COVID-19 guidelines 79.7% of the time. The most frequently followed guidelines were performing hand hygiene, wearing a respirator or well-fitting mask in areas where patients may be present, and wearing eye protection when entering the room for a patient with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. The least performed precautions were performing COVID-19 testing after exposure to a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 case and maintaining social distancing. There was a significant decrease in the perceived importance of adherence to COVID-19 precautions post-vaccination (p <.001, 95% CI [-0.78, -0.35]). CONCLUSIONS: The increased perception of safety after receiving COVID-19 vaccination may negatively influence HCWs' adherence to COVID-19 precautionary guidelines. Continuous education and monitoring of HCWs' safety practices are important to influence HCWs' attitudes to adhere to COVID-19 precautions, particularly after vaccination.

The Factors Associated with the Development of COVID-19 Symptoms among Employees in a U.S. Healthcare Institution.

Healthcare workers have experienced increased occupational health risks caused by COVID-19 disease. The purpose of this project was to examine the relationships between reporting COVID-19 symptoms by employees in a healthcare institution in the United States and employees' demographics, vaccination status, co-morbid conditions, and body mass index (BMI). This project employed a cross-sectional design. It involved the analysis of data on COVID-19 exposure and infection incidents among employees in the healthcare institution. The dataset contained more than 20,000 entries. The results indicate that being female, African American, between 20 and 30 years old, diagnosed with diabetes, diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or on immunosuppressive medicines is associated with greater reporting of COVID-19 symptoms by the employees. Furthermore, BMI is associated with reporting COVID-19 symptoms; the higher the BMI, the greater the likelihood of reporting a symptomatic infection. Moreover, having COPD, being 20-30 years old, being 40-50 years old, BMI, and vaccination status were significantly associated with employees reporting symptoms while controlling for other variables associated with reporting the symptoms among the employees. These findings may be applicable to other infectious disease outbreaks or pandemics.

The emergency nurse responses to triage interruptions and how these responses are perceived by patients: An observational, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers' responses to triage interruptions in the emergency department affect quality of care. The purposes for this study were to (1) Examine the relationship between nurses' response to triage interruption and each of, patients' perceived confidence in nurses' technical skills, perceived competence of triage nurse, and satisfaction with the triage experience, (2) Examine the relationship between nurses' response to triage interruption and nurse demographics. METHODS: Using an observational, prospective design, this study was conducted in an adult academic level 1 trauma center. Data collection tools were: The Triage Interruptions Assessment Tool, Triage and Provider Satisfaction and Confidence Survey, and Demographic Questionnaire. RESULTS: The number of observed triage interviews is 93. Of them, 66 interviews were interrupted. No significant relationships were found between nurses' response to the interruption and patients' perceived confidence in nurses' technical skills, competence of triage nurse, or satisfaction with triage experience. There were no significant relationships between nurses' response to triage interruptions and nurses' demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Triage interruptions in the emergency environment are common and most often result in delays in care. In the current study, this has not been shown to affect patients' satisfaction. Nurses' individual characteristics did not affect their responses to triage interruptions.

Critical Clinical Events and Resilience Among Emergency Nurses in 3 Trauma Hospital-Based Emergency Departments: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency nurses experience occupational stressors resulting from exposures to critical clinical events. The purpose of this study was to identify the critical clinical events for emergency nurses serving 3 patient populations (general, adult, pediatric) and whether the resilience of these nurses differed by the patient population served. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional survey design. A total of 48 emergency nurses were recruited from 3 trauma hospital-based emergency departments (general, adult, pediatric). Clinical Events Questionnaire, Connor-Davidson Resilience scale, and an investigator-developed demographic questionnaire were used to collect data from respondents. RESULTS: All respondents were female (n = 48, 100%), and most were White (n = 46, 96%). The average age of participants was 39.6 years, the average number of years as a registered nurse was 12.7 years, and the average number of years as an emergency nurse was 8.8 years. Clinical events considered most critical were providing care to a sexually abused child, experiencing the death of a coworker, and lack of responsiveness by a colleague during a serious situation. The least stress-provoking event was incidents with excessive media coverage. Nurses were less affected by the critical events they experienced more frequently at work. Nurses in the 3 trauma settings had high level of resilience, with no statistically significant differences between groups. DISCUSSION: The occupational stress from exposure to significant clinical events varied with the patient population served by emergency nurses. It is important that interventions be adopted to alleviate the effect of work-related stressors and promote the psychological health of emergency nurses.