Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of germ cell tumor in Jordan: A tertiary center experience.

Objective: In the Middle East, there is a paucity of data regarding germ cell tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes. Herein, we aim to present the largest series in Jordan reporting our cancer center experience managing GCT. Methods: Between 2010 and 2020, a total of 241 patients with a pathological diagnosis of GCT were treated at our cancer center. Demographic, epidemiologic, and pathological data were retrospectively collected. In addition, survival and relapse outcomes based on tumor stage and adjuvant treatment were collected. Results: A total of 241 patients were diagnosed with GCT, of whom 108 (44.8%) had seminoma and 133 (55.2%) had non-seminoma tumors (NSGCT). Median age (interquartile range) at diagnosis was 31 years (25-36). Patients with seminoma (68.5%) had pT1 disease post orchiectomy, while only 37.5% of patients with NSGCT had pT1 on final pathology. Elevated tumor markers such as beta-human chorionic gonadotropin were present in 10% of seminomas. Following radical orchiectomy and staging, 88 (36.5%) went for active surveillance while 153 patients (63.5%) received adjuvant treatment. With regard to pathology slides read outside, rereading by our genitourinary pathologist yielded a discrepancy on GCT type in 41 (19.3%) out of 212 patients. The median follow-up was 36 (24-48) months. Twenty-two patients relapsed after an average follow-up time of 39 months. The 5-year overall survival for stage I, II, and III was 98%, 94%, and 87%, respectively, and 3-year recurrence-free survival for stage I, II, and III was 94.8%, 78%, and 67%, respectively. Conclusion: Our data on testicular GCT including demographic, histological, and treatment outcomes were comparable to that of developed countries. In light of the pathology discrepancy rate revealed in our study, authors recommend a second review by expert genitourinary pathologists to ensure proper classification and management of GCT.

Outcomes of extraskeletal vs. skeletal Ewing sarcoma patients treated with standard chemotherapy protocol.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of extraskeletal and skeletal Ewing sarcomas treated with standard chemotherapy protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on primary localized skeletal and extraskeletal ES patients. Demographics and disease characteristics were compared between the two groups. The influence of presentation (skeletal vs. extraskeletal) on overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was assessed and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included; 29 (24%) had extraskeletal and 91 (76%) had skeletal ES. All patients received vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC-IE) chemotherapy, with a plan for local control at week 12. At a median follow-up of 38 months, there was no difference in OS between skeletal and extraskeletal ES; 5-year OS 70% and 67% respectively, p = 0.96. Patients with extraskeletal ES had inferior 5-year LRFS compared to skeletal ES; 74% vs. 83%; p = 0.042. Local recurrence occurred at a higher frequency in the extraskeletal group; 28% vs. 11%, p = 0.034, although more extraskeletal patients received adjuvant radiotherapy; 73% vs. 36%, p = 0.01. Among patients who underwent surgery (n = 76), there was no difference in R0 resection rate (skeletal: 89%, extraskeletal: 86%, p = 0.52, or good ( ≥ 90%) tumor necrosis; skeletal: 54%, extraskeletal: 38%, p = 0.31. CONCLUSION: Patients with localized extraskeletal ES have comparable OS outcomes to patients with skeletal ES utilizing the standard VDC-IE chemotherapy. However, extraskeletal patients are at significantly higher risk for local recurrence.

Eight primary malignancies: case report and review of literature.

The incidence of multiple primary malignancies has increased over the past years secondary to the long-term survival of cancer patients due to improvements in the early detection and adequate treatment of cancer. We present a patient with eight primary malignant tumors and review the relevant literature. Our patient was a 59-year-old female with Crohn disease with an otherwise non-contributory medical history. Risk factors for multiple primary tumors were not detected in our patient. At a follow-up of 108 months from the time of diagnosis of the first malignancy, our patient was still alive. Similar long-term survival has been reported in the literature. Due to the realistic potential for long-term survival, we recommend aggressive treatment of these patients.