Gender-based disparities in outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Around 15-20% of lesions necessitating percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are attributed to coronary bifurcation lesions. We aim to study gender-based differences in PCI outcomes among bifurcation stents. METHODS: 3 studies were included after thorough systematic search using MEDLINE (EMBASE and PubMed). CRAN-R software using the Metabin module was used for statistical analysis. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the random effect model and the Mantel-Haenszel method, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) used to determine statistical significance. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2. RESULT: Women exhibited a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.76, I2 = 0%, P < 0.0001), post-procedural bleeding (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.47-0.6, I2 = 0%, P < 0.0001) and post-procedure stroke (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-1.0, I2 = 0%, P < 0.06) as compared to men. However, there were no significant differences in terms of myocardial infarction (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.22-3.27, I2 = 49.4%, P < 0.80) and cardiac tamponade (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.06; 5.72, I2 = 0%, P < 0.6821) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals a noteworthy increase in in-hospital mortality in women, which could be attributed to a higher rate of major bleeding, advanced age, increased co-morbidities, and complex pathophysiology of the lesion in comparison to men. Further studies are required to gain a better understanding of the precise mechanisms thus enhancing procedural outcomes.

Temporal trends and outcomes in utilisation of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve therapies in aortic valve stenosis patients with heart failure.

INTRODUCTIONS & AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to access the temporal trends and outcomes of TAVR or SAVR in HF patients. METHOD: The NIS database from 2011-2014 was queried for patients that underwent TAVR or SAVR and were subsequently diagnosed with HF. Temporal trends in the utilisation of TAVR or SAVR in HF patients were analysed. RESULTS: Among 27 982 patients who were diagnosed with HF of whom 17 681 (63.2%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) while 10 301 (36.8%) had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 9049 (32.3%) underwent TAVR and 16 933 (76.7%) underwent SAVR. Patients with HFrEF and HFpEF had higher utilisation of TAVR compared with SAVR over the course of the study period (P trend < .001). TAVR was associated with lower mortality [2.8% in 2012 and 1.8% in 2014 (P .013)] compared with SAVR. Similarly, multiple logistic regression showed a statistically significant lower in-hospital mortality in the TAVR group compared with SAVR (aOR 0.634; CI 0.504, 0.798, P < .001). CONCLUSION: For patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and heart failure who undergo aortic valve intervention, TAVR is associated with less odds of in-hospital mortality compared with SAVR.

Significance of high sensitivity C-reactive protein and D-dimer in evaluating intracardiac thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast in patients referred for transesophageal echocardiography: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Intra-cardiac thrombus (ICT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) are considered hypercoagulable and inflammatory conditions. We aimed to determine if high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer (DD), in combination with variables of lower thrombotic risk (normal ejection fraction [NEF], sinus rhythm [NSR]), may predict the absence of ICT/SEC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients referred for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) for evaluation of cardioembolic source were prospectively enrolled. CRP and DD levels were determined at the time of TEE. 124 patients were enrolled, of whom 21 had ICT/SEC. The combination of NSR/NEF had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.6% for absence of ICT/SEC. The NPVs of CRP and DD were 93.6% and 85%, respectively. Adding either CRP or DD to NSR/NEF combination increased the NPV to 100%. Log CRP was significantly associated with ICT/SEC. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of NSR and NEF may defer the need for TEE for ICT/SEC evaluation. CRP association with ICT/SEC suggests that inflammation plays a role in ICT/SEC formation. Whether CRP and DD should become routine in the triage process of TEE for ICT/SEC evaluation requires further large scale prospective studies.