Noninvasive Pregestational Genetic Testing of Embryos Using Smart Sensors Array.

Pregestational genetic testing of embryos is the conventional tool in detecting genetic disorders (fetal aneuploidy and monogenic disorders) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures. The accepted clinical practice for genetic testing still depends on biopsy, which has the potential to harm the embryo. Noninvasive genetic prenatal testing has not yet been achieved. In this study, embryos with common genetic disorders created through IVF were tested with an artificially intelligent nanosensor array. Volatile organic compounds emitted by the culture fluid of embryos were analyzed with chemical gas sensors. The obtained results showed significant discrimination between the embryos with different genetic diseases and their wild-types. Embryos were obtained from the same clinical center for avoiding differences based on clinical and demographical characteristics. The achieved discrimination accuracy was 81% for PKD disease, 90% for FRAX disease, 85% for HOCM disease, 90% for BRCA disease, and 100% for HSCR disease. These proof-of-concept findings might launch the development of a noninvasive approach for early assessment of embryos by examining the culture fluid of the embryos, potentially enabling noninvasive diagnosis and screening of genetic diseases for IVF.

Does mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the follicular fluid impact follicle and oocyte performance in IVF treatments?

PROBLEM: The COVID-19 pandemic has many clinical manifestations. Rapid vaccine development raised concerns and speculations about future fertility outcomes and vaccine safety. We evaluated the effect of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on IVF treatment, oocyte and embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes. METHOD OF STUDY: This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in a referral IVF Unit, 3/2021-5/2021. We aimed to recruit all women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles from 3/1-4/30/2021, 2-8 weeks after the second vaccination, and to analyze 50-60 samples in the 2-month period. Patients were categorized according to serum antibody levels: positive for spike (S), positive for nucleotide (N), or negative for both. On the day of ovum pick-up, follicular fluid and blood samples were analyzed for anti-nucleotide (anti-N) antibodies, and anti-spike (anti-S) antibodies, hormonal profile, C-reactive protein (CRP) and other metabolic parameters. RESULTS: Of 59 women enrolled, 37 reported being vaccinated and 22 were not. We found 97% correlation between anti-S and anti-N in the blood and the follicular fluid. Follicular fluid was analyzed based on antibody categorization. All IVF treatment parameters in the follicular fluids and serum were comparable, except CRP was significantly elevated among patients with anti-N antibodies (2.29 [1.42-6.08] vs. 4.11 [1.62-5.75] vs. 1.44 [.36-8.33]; p < .001). Pregnancy outcomes were comparable (44% vs. 33% vs. 50%; p = .97). CONCLUSION: mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine did not appear to affect treatment outcomes or ovarian reserves in the subsequent IVF cycle.

Advanced Materials for Health Monitoring with Skin-Based Wearable Devices.

Skin-based wearable devices have a great potential that could result in a revolutionary approach to health monitoring and diagnosing disease. With continued innovation and intensive attention to the materials and fabrication technologies, development of these healthcare devices is progressively encouraged. This article gives a concise, although admittedly non-exhaustive, didactic review of some of the main concepts and approaches related to recent advances and developments in the scope of skin-based wearable devices (e.g. temperature, strain, biomarker-analysis werable devices, etc.), with an emphasis on emerging materials and fabrication techniques in the relevant fields. To give a comprehensive statement, part of the review presents and discusses different aspects of these advanced materials, such as the sensitivity, biocompatibility and durability as well as the major approaches proposed for enhancing their chemical and physical properties. A complementary section of the review linking these advanced materials with wearable device technologies is particularly specified. Some of the strong and weak points in development of each wearable material/device are highlighted and criticized. Several ideas regarding further improvement of skin-based wearable devices are also discussed.