The Effect of a Collaborative Pediatric Emergency Readiness Improvement Intervention on Patients' Hospital Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that collaborative intervention to improve weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) will be associated with decreased pediatric intensive care (PICU) mortality, PICU and hospital length of stay. METHODS: This study analyzes the transfer of acutely ill and injured patients from general emergency departments (GEDs) to our institution. The intervention involved customized assessment reports focusing on team performance and systems improvement for pediatric readiness, sharing best practices and clinical resources, designation of a nurse PECC at each GED and ongoing interactions at 2 and 4 months. Data was collected from charts before and after the intervention, focusing on patients transferred to our pediatric emergency department (ED) or directly admitted to our PICU from the GEDs. Clinical outcomes such as PICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and PICU mortality were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used for demographics, and various statistical tests were employed to analyze the data. Bivariate analyses and multivariable models were utilized to examine patient outcomes and the association between the intervention and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 278 patients in the pre-intervention period and 314 patients in the post-intervention period. Multivariable analyses revealed a significant association between the change in WPRS and decreased PICU LOS (ß=-0.05 [95% CI: -0.09, -0.01), p=0.023), and hospital LOS (ß=-0.12 [95% CI: -0.21, -0.04], p=0.004), but showed no association between the intervention and other patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, improving pediatric readiness scores in GEDs was associated with significant improvements in PICU and hospital length of stay. Future initiatives should focus on disseminating pediatric readiness efforts to improve outcomes of critically ill children nationally. WHATS NEW: Improving pediatric readiness scores in general emergency departments is associated with improved downstream clinical outcomes demonstrated by reduced PICU and hospital length of stay.

Implementing the Pediatric Ventilator Liberation Guidelines Using the Most Current Evidence.

Invasive mechanical ventilation is prevalent and associated with considerable morbidity. Pediatric critical care teams must identify the best timing and approach to liberating (extubating) children from this supportive care modality. Unsurprisingly, practice variation varies widely. As a first step to minimizing that variation, the first evidence-based pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines were published in 2023 and included 15 recommendations. Unfortunately, there is often a substantial delay before clinical guidelines reach widespread clinical practice. As such, it is important to consider barriers and facilitators using a systematic approach during implementation planning and design. In this narrative review, we will (1) summarize guideline recommendations, (2) discuss recent evidence and identify practice gaps relating to those recommendations, and (3) hypothesize about potential barriers and facilitators to their implementation in clinical practice.

Institutional Variability in Respiratory Support Use for Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Rationale: Over 20,000 children are hospitalized in the United States for asthma every year. Although initial treatment guidelines are well established, there is a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the optimal respiratory support devices for these patients.Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate institutional and temporal variability in the use of respiratory support modalities for pediatric critical asthma.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Virtual Pediatrics Systems database. Our study population included children older than 2 years old admitted to a VPS contributing pediatric intensive care unit from January 2012 to December 2021 with a primary diagnosis of asthma or status asthmaticus. We evaluated the percentage of encounters using a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), noninvasive bilevel positive pressure ventilation (NIV), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for all institutions, then divided institutions into quintiles based on the volume of patients. We created logistic regression models to determine the influence of institutional volume and year of admission on respiratory support modality use. We also conducted time-series analyses using Kendall's tau.Results: Our population included 77,115 patient encounters from 163 separate institutions. Institutional use of respiratory modalities had significant variation in HFNC (28.3%, interquartile range [IQR], 11.0-49.0%; P < 0.01), CPAP (1.4%; IQR, 0.3-4.3%; P < 0.01), NIV (8.6%; IQR, 3.5-16.1%; P < 0.01), and IMV (5.1%; IQR, 3.1-8.2%; P < 0.01). Increased institutional patient volume was associated with significantly increased use of NIV (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 1.29-1.36; P < 0.01) and CPAP (OR, 1.20; 1.15-1.25; P < 0.01), and significantly decreased use of HFNC (OR, 0.80; 0.79-0.81; P < 0.01) and IMV (OR, 0.82; 0.79-0.86; P < 0.01). Time was also associated with a significant increase in the use of HFNC (11.0-52.3%; P < 0.01), CPAP (1.6-5.4%; P < 0.01), and NIV (3.7-21.2%; P < 0.01), whereas there was no significant change in IMV use (6.1-4.0%; P = 0.11).Conclusions: Higher-volume centers are using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation more frequently for pediatric critical asthma and lower frequencies of HFNC and IMV. Treatment with HFNC, CPAP, and NIV for this population is increasing in the last decade.

Development and Implementation of a Quick Response (QR) Code System to Streamline the Process for Fellows' Evaluation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at a Large Academic Center.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Useful feedback and evaluation are critical to a medical trainee's development. While most academic physicians understand that giving feedback to learners is essential, many do not consider the components of feedback to be truly useful, and there are barriers to implementation. We sought to use a quick reader (QR) system to solicit feedback for trainees in two pediatric subspecialties (pediatric critical care and neonatal-perinatal medicine) at one institution to increase the quality and quantity of feedback received. METHODS: New valuations were modified from the existing evaluations and imported into online systems with QR code capability. Each fellow was given a QR code linking to evaluations and encouraged to solicit feedback and evaluations in a variety of clinical settings and scenarios. Evaluation numbers and quality of evaluations were assessed and compared both pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: There were increases in the number of evaluations completed for both the pediatric critical care fellows and the neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows. There was no overall change in the quality of written evaluations received. Satisfaction with the evaluation system improved for both faculty and fellows of both training programs. CONCLUSION: In our critical care units, we were successfully able to implement a QR code-driven evaluation for our fellows that improved access for the faculty and offered the ability of the learner to solicit evaluations, without compromising the number or quality of evaluations. What's new: Quick reader (QR) codes can be used by learners to solicit evaluations and feedback from faculty. They can increase the quantity of written evaluations received without affecting their quality.

Outcomes of a respiratory therapist driven high flow nasal cannula management protocol for pediatric critical asthma patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine if a respiratory therapist (RT)-driven high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) protocol could decrease duration of HFNC use, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), and duration of continuous albuterol use in pediatric patients with critical asthma. METHODS: This was a quality improvement project performed at a quaternary academic PICU. Patients admitted to the PICU between 2 and 18 years of age with a diagnosis of asthma requiring continuous albuterol and HFNC were included. Implementation of an RT-driven HFNC protocol [Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) 1] occurred in October 2017. Additional interventions included weaning continuous albuterol and HFNC simultaneously (PDSA 2; March 2019), adjusting HFNC wean rate (PDSA 3; July 2020), and a HFNC holiday (PDSA 4; October 2021). HFNC duration was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included LOS data and continuous albuterol duration. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and 7-day PICU and hospital readmission rates were used as balancing measures. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients were included. Patient demographics and adjunct therapy use did not differ among the groups. After PDSA 2, mean HFNC duration decreased (26.8-18.1 h). Mean PICU LOS decreased (41-31.8 h). Mean hospital LOS also decreased (86.5-68 h). These outcomes remained stable during PDSA 3 and 4. Continuous albuterol duration and NIV use were unchanged, while IMV use decreased. CONCLUSIONS: An RT-driven HFNC protocol led to decreased length of HFNC and PICU and hospital LOS for pediatric patients with critical asthma without an increase in adverse events.

Factors Associated With Improved Pediatric Resuscitative Care in General Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the quality of pediatric resuscitative care in general emergency departments (GEDs) and to determine hospital-level factors associated with higher quality. METHODS: Prospective observational study of resuscitative care provided to 3 in situ simulated patients (infant seizure, infant sepsis, and child cardiac arrest) by interprofessional GED teams. A composite quality score (CQS) was measured and the association of this score with modifiable and nonmodifiable hospital-level factors was explored. RESULTS: A median CQS of 62.8 of 100 (interquartile range 50.5-71.1) was noted for 287 resuscitation teams from 175 emergency departments. In the unadjusted analyses, a higher score was associated with the modifiable factor of an affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC) and the nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. In the adjusted analyses, a higher CQS was associated with modifiable factors of an affiliation with a PAMC and the designation of both a nurse and physician pediatric emergency care coordinator, and nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores. CONCLUSIONS: A low quality of pediatric resuscitative care, measured using simulation, was noted across a cohort of GEDs. Hospital factors associated with higher quality included: an affiliation with a PAMC, designation of a pediatric emergency care coordinator, higher pediatric volume, and geographic location. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores.

Association of Extubation Failure Rates With High-Flow Nasal Cannula, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, and Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Infants and Young Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Extubation failure (EF) has been associated with worse outcomes in critically ill children. The relative efficacy of different modes of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) to prevent EF is unknown. Objective: To study the reported relative efficacy of different modes of NRS (high-flow nasal cannula [HFNC], continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP], and bilevel positive airway pressure [BiPAP]) compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT). Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL Complete through May 2022. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials that enrolled critically ill children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours and compared the efficacy of different modes of postextubation NRS. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Random-effects models were fit using a bayesian network meta-analysis framework. Between-group comparisons were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Treatment rankings were assessed by rank probabilities and the surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was EF (reintubation within 48 to 72 hours). Secondary outcomes were treatment failure (TF, reintubation plus NRS escalation or crossover to another NRS mode), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality, PICU and hospital length of stay, abdominal distension, and nasal injury. Results: A total of 11 615 citations were screened, and 9 randomized clinical trials with a total of 1421 participants were included. Both CPAP and HFNC were found to be more effective than COT in reducing EF and TF (CPAP: OR for EF, 0.43; 95% CrI, 0.17-1.0 and OR for TF 0.27, 95% CrI 0.11-0.57 and HFNC: OR for EF, 0.64; 95% CrI, 0.24-1.0 and OR for TF, 0.34; 95% CrI, 0.16- 0.65). CPAP had the highest likelihood of being the best intervention for both EF (SUCRA, 0.83) and TF (SUCRA, 0.91). Although not statistically significant, BiPAP was likely to be better than COT for preventing both EF and TF. Compared to COT, CPAP and BiPAP were reported as showing a modest increase (approximately 3%) in nasal injury and abdominal distension. Conclusions and Relevance: The studies included in this systematic review and network meta-analysis found that compared with COT, EF and TF rates were lower with modest increases in abdominal distension and nasal injury. Of the modes evaluated, CPAP was associated with the lowest rates of EF and TF.

Predicting Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric ICU.

BACKGROUND: Timely ventilator liberation can prevent morbidities associated with invasive mechanical ventilation in the pediatric ICU (PICU). There currently exists no standard benchmark for duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in the PICU. This study sought to develop and validate a multi-center prediction model of invasive mechanical ventilation duration to determine a standardized duration of invasive mechanical ventilation ratio. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using registry data from 157 institutions in the Virtual Pediatric Systems database. The study population included encounters in the PICU between 2012-2021 involving endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the first day of PICU admission who received invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 h. Subjects were stratified into a training cohort (2012-2017) and 2 validation cohorts (2018-2019/2020-2021). Four models to predict the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation were trained using data from the first 24 h, validated, and compared. RESULTS: The study included 112,353 unique encounters. All models had observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios close to one but low mean squared error and R2 values. The random forest model was the best performing model and achieved an O/E ratio of 1.043 (95% CI 1.030-1.056) and 1.004 (95% CI 0.990-1.019) in the validation cohorts and 1.009 (95% CI 1.004-1.016) in the full cohort. There was a high degree of institutional variation, with single-unit O/E ratios ranging between 0.49-1.91. When stratified by time period, there were observable changes in O/E ratios at the individual PICU level over time. CONCLUSIONS: We derived and validated a model to predict the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation that performed well in aggregated predictions at the PICU and the cohort level. This model could be beneficial in quality improvement and institutional benchmarking initiatives for use at the PICU level and for tracking of performance over time.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Screening Chest Radiographs in a Pediatric ICU.

BACKGROUND: The Critical Care Societies Collaborative included not ordering diagnostic tests at regular intervals as one of their Choosing Wisely initiatives. A reduction in unnecessary chest radiographs (CXRs) can help reduce exposure to radiation and eliminate health care waste. We aimed to reduce daily screening CXRs in a pediatric ICU (PICU) by 20% from baseline within 4 months of implementation of CXR criteria. METHODS: All intubated patients in the PICU were included in this quality improvement project. Patients with tracheostomies were excluded. We developed criteria delineating which patients were most likely to benefit from a daily screening CXR, and these criteria were discussed for each patient on rounds. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, or on high support on conventional mechanical ventilation were included as needing a daily screening CXR. We tracked the percentage of intubated subjects receiving a screening CXR as an outcome measure. Unplanned extubations and the number of non-screening CXRs per intubated subject were followed as balancing measures. RESULTS: The percentage of intubated subjects receiving a daily screening CXR was reduced from 79% to 31%. There was no increase in frequency of unplanned extubations or number of non-screening CXRs. With an estimated subject charge of roughly $270 and hospital cost of $54 per CXR, this project led to an estimated $300,000 in patient charge savings and $60,000 in hospital cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting criteria to delineate which patients are most likely to benefit from screening CXRs can lead to a reduction in the percentage of intubated patients receiving screening CXRs without appearing to increase harm.

Improving Outcomes for Bronchiolitis Patients After Implementing a High-Flow Nasal Cannula Holiday and Standardizing Discharge Criteria in a PICU.

OBJECTIVES: To decrease length of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), PICU, and hospital length of stay (LOS). DESIGN: Quality improvement project. SETTING: A quaternary academic PICU. PATIENTS: Patients with bronchiolitis less than 24 months old. INTERVENTIONS: After initial implementation of a respiratory therapist (RT)-driven HFNC protocol (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] 1) in October 2017, additional interventions included adjusting HFNC wean rate (PDSA 2) in July 2020, a HFNC holiday (PDSA 3), and standardized discharge criteria (PDSA 4) in October 2021. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of HFNC was used as the primary outcome measure. PICU LOS and hospital LOS were used as secondary outcome measures. Noninvasive ventilation use, invasive mechanical ventilation use, and 7-day PICU and hospital readmission rates were used as balancing measures. A total of 1,310 patients were included in this study. Patients in PDSA 2, PDSA 3 and 4 groups were older compared with pre-intervention and PDSA 1 (median of 9 and 10 mo compared with 8 mo; p = 0.01). HFNC duration decreased from 2.5 to 1.8 days after PDSA 1, then to 1.3 days after PDSA 2. PICU LOS decreased from 2.6 to 2.1 days after PDSA 1, 1.8 days after PDSA 2, and 1.5 days after PDSA 3 and 4. Hospital LOS decreased from 5.7 to 4.5 days after PDSA 1, 3.1 days after PDSA 2, and 2.7 days after PDSA 3 and 4. The use of noninvasive ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation decreased throughout the study from 23.2% in the pre-intervention group, to 6.9% at the end of the project. The 7-day PICU and hospital readmission rates did not increase after implementation. The percentage of patients discharged from the PICU increased from 6.2% to 21.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to an existing RT-driven HFNC protocol and standardization of discharge criteria led to an improvement in outcomes for patients admitted to the PICU with bronchiolitis without an increase in adverse events.

Operational Definitions Related to Pediatric Ventilator Liberation.

BACKGROUND: Common, operational definitions are crucial to assess interventions and outcomes related to pediatric mechanical ventilation. These definitions can reduce unnecessary variability among research and quality improvement efforts, to ensure findings are generalizable, and can be pooled to establish best practices. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can we establish operational definitions for key elements related to pediatric ventilator liberation using a combination of detailed literature review and consensus-based approaches? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A panel of 26 international experts in pediatric ventilator liberation, two methodologists, and two librarians conducted systematic reviews on eight topic areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Through a series of virtual meetings, we established draft definitions that were voted upon using an anonymous web-based process. Definitions were revised by incorporating extracted data gathered during the systematic review and discussed in another consensus meeting. A second round of voting was conducted to confirm the final definitions. RESULTS: In eight topic areas identified by the experts, 16 preliminary definitions were established. Based on initial discussion and the first round of voting, modifications were suggested for 11 of the 16 definitions. There was significant variability in how these items were defined in the literature reviewed. The final round of voting achieved ≥ 80% agreement for all 16 definitions in the following areas: what constitutes respiratory support (invasive mechanical ventilation and noninvasive respiratory support), liberation and failed attempts to liberate from invasive mechanical ventilation, liberation from respiratory support, duration of noninvasive respiratory support, total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials, extubation readiness testing, 28 ventilator-free days, and planned vs rescue use of post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support. INTERPRETATION: We propose that these consensus-based definitions for elements of pediatric ventilator liberation, informed by evidence, be used for future quality improvement initiatives and research studies to improve generalizability and facilitate comparison.

Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network Document.

Rationale: Pediatric-specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients' readiness for extubation. Methods: Twenty-six international experts comprised a multiprofessional panel to establish pediatrics-specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. A systematic review was conducted for questions that did not meet an a priori threshold of ⩾80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence and drafted and voted on the recommendations. Measurements and Main Results: Three questions related to systematic screening using an extubation readiness testing bundle and a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ⩾80% agreement. For the remaining eight questions, five systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials, measures of respiratory muscle strength, assessment of risk of postextubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention, use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support, and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions: This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation.

Safety and Efficacy of Propofol- and Ketamine-Based Procedural Sedation Regimen in Pediatric Patients During Burn Repetitive Dressing Change: 10 Years Single Center Experience.

It is crucial to provide an adequate level of sedation and analgesia during burn dressing changes in the pediatric population due to the amount of pain and anxiety patients experience during the procedure. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intensivist-based deep sedation regimen using a combination of propofol and ketamine to provide procedural sedation to pediatric burn patients. This is a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent inpatient burn wound dressing changes from 2011 through 2021. Demographic and clinical data, including age, length of the procedure, recovery time, medication doses, and adverse events, were collected. A total of 104 patients aged between 45 and 135 months with a median total burn body surface area (TBSA) of 11.5 percent (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0, 25.0) underwent 378 procedural sedation encounters with propofol- and ketamine-based sedation. The median total dose of propofol was 7 mg/kg (IRQ 5.3, 9.2). Of these sedations, 64 (17 percent) had minor adverse events, of which 50 (13 percent) were transient hypoxemia, 12 (3 percent) were upper airway obstruction, and 2 (0.5 percent) were hypotension. There were no serious adverse events. Hypoxemia was not related to age, weight, gender, burn TBSA, or total dose of propofol. There were 35 (33.6 percent) patients who had repetitive sedation encounters with no statistically significant changes in propofol dose or adverse events with the repeated encounters. Children can be effectively sedated for repetitive inpatient burn dressing changes. Given the high-risk patient populations, this procedure should be performed under the vigilance of highly trained providers.

Simulation-based assessment of care for an infant with cardiogenic shock in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of infant deaths associated with birth defects. Neonates with undiagnosed CHD often present to general emergency departments (GEDs) for initial resuscitation that are less prepared than paediatric centres, resulting in disparities in the quality of care. Neonates with undiagnosed CHD represent a challenge; thus, it is necessary for GEDs to be prepared for this population. AIM: To evaluate the process of resuscitative care provided to a neonate in cardiogenic shock due to CHD in the GEDs in a simulated setting and to describe the impact of teams and GED variables on the process of care. METHODS: This is a prospective simulation-based assessment of the process of care provided to a neonate with coarctation of the aorta in cardiogenic shock. Simulation sessions were conducted at participating GEDs utilizing each GED's interdisciplinary team and resources. The primary outcome was adherence to best practice, as measured by a 15-item overall composite adherence score (CAS). In addition, we stratified the overall CAS into CHD-critical items and the general resuscitation items CAS. The secondary outcome was the impact of the team's and GED's characteristics on the scores. RESULTS: This study enrolled 32 teams from 12 GEDs. Among 161 participants, 103 (63.97%) were registered nurses, 33 (20.50%) were physicians, 17 (10.56%) were respiratory therapists, and 8 (4.97%) were other medical professionals. The overall median CAS was 84, with the CHD-critical items having a median CAS of 34.5. The most underperformed tasks are checking pulses on the upper and lower extremities (44%), obtaining blood pressure in the upper and lower extremities (25%), and administering prostaglandin E1 (22%). CONCLUSIONS: Using in situ simulation in a set of GEDs, we revealed gaps in the resuscitation care of neonates with CHD in cardiogenic shock. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These findings highlight the importance of targeted improvement programs for high-stakes illnesses in GED.

A Network Meta-analysis of Dexamethasone for Preventing Postextubation Upper Airway Obstruction in Children.

Rationale: Periextubation corticosteroids are commonly used in children to prevent upper airway obstruction (UAO). However, the best timing and dose combination of corticosteroids is unknown. Objectives: To compare effectiveness of different corticosteroid regimens in preventing UAO and reintubation. Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase search identified randomized trials in children using corticosteroids to prevent UAO. All studies used dexamethasone. The studies were categorized based on timing of initiation of dexamethasone (early use: >12 h before extubation) and the dose (high dose: ⩾0.5 mg/kg/dose). We performed Bayesian network meta-analysis with studies grouped into four regimens: high dose, early use (HE); low dose, early use (LE); high dose, late use (HL); and low dose, late use. Results: Eight trials (n = 903) were included in the analysis. For preventing UAO (odds ratio; 95% credible interval), HE (0.13; 0.04-0.36), HL (0.39; 0.19-0.74), and LE (0.15; 0.04-0.58) regimens appear to be more effective than no dexamethasone (low certainty). HE and LE had the highest probability of being the top-ranked regimens for preventing UAO (surface under the cumulative ranking curve 0.901 and 0.808, respectively). For preventing reintubation, the effect estimate was imprecise for all four dexamethasone regimens compared with no dexamethasone (very low certainty). HE and LE were the top-ranked regimens (surface under the cumulative ranking curve 0.803 and 0.720, respectively) for preventing reintubation. Sensitivity analysis showed that regimens that started >12 hours before extubation were likely more effective than regimens started >6 hours before extubation. Conclusions: Periextubation dexamethasone can prevent postextubation UAO in children, but effectiveness is highly dependent on timing and dosing regimen. Early initiation (ideally >12 h before extubation) appears to be more important than the dose of dexamethasone. Ultimately, the specific steroid strategy should be personalized, considering the potential for adverse events associated with dexamethasone and the individual risk of UAO and reintubation.

Scoping Review: Neurocognitive Outcome Assessments After Critical Illness in Children.

OBJECTIVES: To map the literature regarding assessment of neurocognitive outcomes in PICU survivors. Secondary objectives were to identify literature gaps and to provide data for development of a Core Outcome Measures Set in the domain. METHODS: Planned, a priori analysis was performed of data from an over-all scoping review of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome-pediatrics (PICS-p) functional outcomes. English-language databases and registries from 1970 to 2017 were searched by a medical librarian to identify manuscripts reporting on Post Intensive Care Syndrome-pediatrics (PICS-p). Further, detailed data extraction for neurocognitive outcomes was performed focusing on study characteristics, instruments used, and populations. RESULTS: 114 instruments evaluated neurocognitive function in 183 manuscripts. 83% of manuscripts were published after 2000. Median of 3 (IQR 2-5) neurocognitive instruments per manuscript were reported. Wechsler Scales (45%), clinical neurologic evaluations (21%), Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (20%), Bayley Scales of Infant Development (16%), and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (11%) were the most commonly used instruments. Median sample size was 65 (IQR 32-129) subjects. Most (63%) assessments were conducted in-person and parents/guardians (40%) provided the information. Patients with congenital heart disease and traumatic brain injury were most commonly evaluated (31% and 24% of manuscripts, respectively). Adolescents were the most commonly studied age group (34%). Baseline function was infrequently assessed (11% of manuscripts); most studies assessed patients at only one time point after PICU discharge. Within studies, neurocognitive assessments were often combined with others - especially social (18%) and physical (8%). CONCLUSIONS: 183 manuscripts studied the neurocognitive domain of PICS-p. Studies were quantitative and tended to focus on populations with anticipated cognitive impairment. Considerable variability exists among the chosen 114 instruments used; however, 4 instruments were frequently chosen with focus on intelligence, cerebral functioning, and developmental and adaptive behavior. The literature is marked by lack of agreement on methodologies but reflects the burgeoning interest in studying PICS-p neurocognitive outcomes.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Unneeded Screening Chest Radiographs in a Pediatric Cardiovascular ICU.

BACKGROUND: Adult critical care and radiographical societies have recommended changing practice from routine screening radiographs to on-demand chest radiographs (CXRs) for stable mechanically ventilated adult patients. There are no similar recommendations for patients in the pediatric ICU. Reducing the frequency with which unneeded CXRs are obtained can decrease radiation exposure and reduce waste, a substantial contributor to rising health care costs. We aimed to reduce unneeded daily screening CXRs in a pediatric cardiovascular ICU (CICU) by 20% in 6 months. METHODS: Criteria delineating which subjects in the CICU required daily screening CXRs were created and added to the daily rounding sheet for discussion for each subject. The primary goal of this study was to reduce CXRs in mechanically ventilated subjects as our previous practice had been to order daily CXRs. Respiratory therapists increased the frequency of evaluating and documenting endotracheal tube positioning prior to the initiation of this project. The outcome measure was the percentage subjects who received a daily screening CXR. The ratio of daily screening CXRs to the number of total CXRs ordered and unplanned extubations were followed as balancing measures. RESULTS: The number of subjects who received a daily screening CXR decreased from a baseline of 67% to 44% over the course of this project. There was no change in the ratio of daily screening CXRs to the number of total CXRs ordered or an increase in unplanned extubations. With an estimated cost of $268 per CXR, a reduction of 33% in routine screening CXRs saves an estimated $250,000 annually. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in daily screening CXRs can be sustained through the development of specific criteria to determine which patients need screening radiographs. This can be achieved without an increase in CXRs obtained at other times throughout the day or an increase in unplanned extubations. This eliminates unneeded health care expenditures, improves resource allocation for radiology technicians, and decreases disruptive interventions for patients.

Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: A Survey of International Practice Among 555 Pediatric Intensivists.

Pediatric ventilation liberation has limited evidence, likely resulting in wide practice variation. To inform future work, practice patterns must first be described. OBJECTIVES: Describe international pediatric ventilation liberation practices and regional practice variation. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: International cross-sectional electronic survey. Nontrainee pediatric medical and cardiac critical care physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Practices focusing on spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) eligibility, SBT practice, non-SBT extubation readiness bundle elements, and post-extubation respiratory support. RESULTS: Five-hundred fifty-five responses representing 47 countries were analyzed. Most respondents reported weaning followed by an SBT (86.4%). The top SBT eligibility variables reported were positive end-expiratory pressure (95%), Fio2 (93.4%), and peak inspiratory pressure (73.9%). Most reported use of standardized pressure support regardless of endotracheal tube size (40.4%) with +10 cm H2O predominating (38.6%). SBT durations included less than or equal to 30 minutes (34.8%), 31 minutes to 1 hour (39.3%), and greater than 1 hours (26%). In assigning an SBT result, top variables were respiratory rate (94%), oxygen saturation (89.3%), and subjective work of breathing (79.8%). Most reported frequent consideration of endotracheal secretion burden (81.3%), standardized pain/sedation measurement (72.8%), fluid balance (83%), and the endotracheal air leak test as a part of extubation readiness bundles. Most reported using planned high flow nasal cannula in less than or equal to 50% of extubations (83.2%). Top subpopulations supported with planned HFNC were those with chronic lung disease (67.3%), exposed to invasive ventilation greater than 14 days (66.6%), and chronic critical illness (44.9%). Most reported using planned noninvasive ventilation (NIV) following less than or equal to 20% of extubations (79.9%). Top subpopulations supported with planned NIV were those with neuromuscular disease (72.8%), chronic lung disease (66.7%), and chronic NIV use for any reason (61.6%). Regional variation was high for most practices studied. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: International pediatric ventilation liberation practices are heterogeneous. Future study is needed to address key evidence gaps. Many practice differences were associated with respondent region, which must be considered in international study design.

Clinical Challenges in Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: A Meta-Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: To map the evidence for ventilation liberation practices in pediatric respiratory failure using the Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards publication standards. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and EMBASE. Trial registers included the following: ClinicalTrials.gov, European Union clinical trials register, International Standardized Randomized Controlled Trial Number register. STUDY SELECTION: Abstracts were screened followed by review of full text. Articles published in English language incorporating a heterogeneous population of both infants and older children were assessed. DATA EXTRACTION: None. DATA SYNTHESIS: Weaning can be considered as the process by which positive pressure is decreased and the patient becomes increasingly responsible for generating the energy necessary for effective gas exchange. With the growing use of noninvasive respiratory support, extubation can lie in the middle of the weaning process if some additional positive pressure is used after extubation, while for some extubation may constitute the end of weaning. Testing for extubation readiness is a key component of the weaning process as it allows the critical care practitioner to assess the capability and endurance of the patient's respiratory system to resume unassisted ventilation. Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are often seen as extubation readiness testing (ERT), but the SBT is used to determine if the patient can maintain adequate spontaneous ventilation with minimal ventilatory support, whereas ERT implies the patient is ready for extubation. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggests using a structured approach that includes a daily assessment of patient's readiness to extubate may reduce total ventilation time. Increasing evidence indicates that such daily assessments needs to include SBTs without added pressure support. Measures of elevated load as well as measures of impaired respiratory muscle capacity are independently associated with extubation failure in children, indicating that these should also be assessed as part of ERT.