The effect of community nurse on mortality and hospi- talization in a group of over-75 older adults: a nested case-control study.

Background: Bio-psycho-social frailty can negatively affect the health status of an ageing population. The integration between community nurses and social services can emphasize community care and prevent the onset of both health and social negative outcomes in the older population. The aim of the paper is to explore the causal association through the analysis of the hospitalization and mortality rate after a pro-active social service integrated by the community nurse. Study Design: A nested case-control study comparing groups of older adults has been carried out. Methods. The paper compares data stem from a cohort followed up by the University of Rome "Tor Vergata" with data from the "Long Live the Elderly!" program (LLE) cohort. Results: One-year standardized mortality rate was 6.5%, 4.7% and 7.5% in the control group, the LLE group and the LLE group integrated by the community nurse (LLE-CN), respectively. One-year hospitalization rate was 15.4%, 15.5% and 10.8% in the control group, the LLE group and the LLE-CN group, respectively. Conclusions: According to our results a social service with a pro-active approach, integrated by the community nurse, appears to be able to reduce mortality and hospitalization in a group of older adults aged>75. The multidimensional assessment of frailty stands for the first step of a new organization of community services.

Assessing the Impact of A Community-Based Pro-Active Monitoring Program Addressing the need for Care of Community-Dwelling Citizens aged more than 80: Protocol for a Prospective Pragmatic Trial and Results of the Baseline Assessment.

The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol of a study assessing the impact of a Community-based pro-Active Monitoring Program, by measuring the effect in counteracting the adverse outcomes related to frailty. METHODS: a prospective pragmatic trial will be carried out to describe the impact of an intervention on people aged>80, adjusted for relevant parameters: demographic variables, comorbidities, disability and bio-psycho-social frailty. They have been assessed with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire that is a validated tool. Mortality, Acute Hospital Admission rates, Emergency Room Visit rates and Institutionalization rates are the main outcomes to be evaluated annually, over three years. Two groups of patients, made up by 578 cases (undergoing the intervention under study) and 607 controls have been enrolled and interviewed. RESULTS: at baseline the two groups are quite similar for age, living arrangement, comorbidity, disability and cognitive status. They differ in education, economic resources and physical status (that are better in the control group) and in social resources (that is better in the case group). The latter was expected since the intervention is focused on increasing social capital at individual and community level and aimed at improving survival among the cases as well as reducing the recourse to hospital and residential Long Term Care. CONCLUSION: The proposed study addresses a crucial issue: assessing the impact of a bottom up care service consisting of social and health interventions aimed at reducing social isolation and improving access to health care services.