Development of an experimental model of septic knee arthritis in rats through intra-articular inoculation of Staphylococcus aureus.

Haematogenous models of septic arthritis have some inherent disadvantages, such as the manifestation of arthritis relies on chance, the size of the inoculum is unknown and the number of animals to be studied cannot be reduced because the animals cannot serve as their own controls. This study aimed to develop a rat model of knee septic arthritis by injecting a known inoculum of Staphylococcus aureus into the joint. The left knees of 27 Sprague Dawley rats were injected with four different inoculum concentrations of a sensitive strain of S. aureus (30,000 colony-forming units (CFUs), n = 3; 18,550 CFUs, n = 6; 15,500 CFUs, n = 9; and 7700 CFUs, n = 9); the right knees served as controls. Clinical, microbiological and histological variables were assessed two and seven days later. The main criterion for diagnosing septic arthritis was a positive culture of synovial fluid. The rate of microbiologically confirmed septic arthritis was high for all inoculum concentrations (3/3, 6/6, 8/9 and 7/9, respectively), and the rate of bacteraemia was also high. Animal welfare was better for the two lowest inoculum concentrations. No animal reached the pre-established humane end points. Overall, the third inoculum was considered the most suitable. Thus, acute septic arthritis can be caused in rats by inoculating 15,000 CFUs of an ATCC strain of S. aureus directly into the knee joint. Overall, the model seems to be useful for studying the effectiveness of drugs for the treatment of acute septic arthritis.

Sevoflurano tópico como tratamiento analgésico y antimicrobiano de tenosinovitis piógena de los flexores de la mano. Caso clínico / Topical sevoflurane as analgesic and antimicrobial treatment of pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis of the hand. Case report

Presentamos el caso de un paciente con una tenosinovitis piógena del 5° dedo de la mano, tratado inicialmente con desbridamiento quirúrgico y antibioterapia empírica. La evolución fue desfavorable, pues el dedo presentaba un defecto de cobertura con signos infecciosos en la herida y las curas resultaban muy dolorosas. Al paciente se le ofertaron varias opciones quirúrgicas y, mientras se decidía por alguna, aceptó por escrito iniciar curas con sevoflurano líquido tópico (según protocolo vigente para uso de fármacos fuera de indicación). El efecto analgésico del sevoflurano apareció rápidamente, y la evolución posterior de la herida fue muy favorable, pues los signos infecciosos desaparecieron y el defecto de cobertura se había cerrado tras tres semanas de empleo de sevoflurano tópico, sin necesidad de nuevas cirugías. Este caso ejemplifica que el uso fuera de indicación de sevoflurano tópico para tratar heridas complejas puede evitar actuaciones quirúrgicas, mucho más agresivas para los pacientes.

The clinical case is presented on a patient suffering from pyogenic tenosynovitis affecting the 5th finger of the hand, which was initially treated with surgical debridement and empirical antibiotic treatment. The clinical outcome was unfavourable, since the finger presented with a coverage defect, and the wound seemed to be infected. Wound cleaning and dressings were very painful. The patient was asked to choose between several surgical therapeutic alternatives, but he gave written informed consent to be treated with topical sevoflurane, following an approved protocol for the off-label use of this drug. Pain was accurately controlled after sevoflurane application, and the wound exhibited a very good outcome with disappearance of the clinical signs of infection and complete closure of the defect coverage after three weeks of sevoflurane, with no new surgical procedures. The present clinical case illustrates how the off-label use of topical sevoflurane for the treatment of complicated wounds could be useful to avoid surgical procedures that are more aggressive for patients.

Uncooperative Patient With an Infected Elbow Osteosynthesis: Alternative Management With Topical Sevoflurane.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of an infected osteosynthesis is usually a complicated process, with its complexity increasing when unforeseen situations appear. Typically, the therapeutic management of such situations is challenging because they are not anticipated in the medical literature and physicians have to look for and adapt novel solutions to a specific patient condition. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old, uncooperative, homeless man, presented to the emergency room with a left olecranon fracture. After planned surgery, the surgical wound became infected with a methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus because the treatment took place in an unhygienic outpatient hospital setting. The patient refused to remain in the hospital and also failed to complete antibiotic courses prescribed (culture-guided rifampicin 600 mg daily plus levofloxacin 500 mg daily). Instead of removing the osteosynthesis material, the infection was successfully treated by repeated applications of 5 mL of sevoflurane into the surgical wound. Subsequently, wound healing was achieved with a combination of a brief course of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), use of silver-impregnated dressings, and irrigation of the wound with sevoflurane. Sevoflurane also provided topical analgesic to ameliorate the pain caused by removing the NPWT sponge. Interestingly, despite extremely poor compliance by the patient to all standard treatment regimens, and the clinical decision to retain the implant, the infection was resolved, and the fracture was consolidated. CONCLUSIONS: Local application of sevoflurane in the wound bed appears to exhibit analgesic, antimicrobial, and positive healing effects. It could be a promising alternative treatment to be included as a therapeutic option for wound care.