Building and sustaining a culture of innovation in nursing Academics, Research, Policy, and Practice: Outcomes of the National Innovation Summit.

Healthcare in America faces multiple major challenges, highlighting the critical need for innovative solutions to systemic problems. Nursing is uniquely positioned to lead innovation in healthcare. Nurses represent the largest segment of the healthcare workforce, have the greatest exposure to system failures, and must develop workarounds and solutions for the numerous daily gaps in healthcare delivery. However, multiple barriers limit nurses' ability to engage in the essential work of innovating the future of healthcare. With the goal of bringing attention and urgent action to the need for innovation at all levels of nursing and healthcare, experts in innovation from The Ohio State University gathered nationally recognized nursing leaders in the format of an Innovation Summit to identify gaps in and barriers to innovation in healthcare along with solutions. Using a collaborative process, experts at the Summit identified and developed initial solutions to identified gaps and barriers to innovation across four key areas, which for the purpose of the Summit, we have designated four pillars: Academics, Research, Policy, and Practice. The experts believed that a focus on instilling innovation in all four pillars is necessary to improve healthcare and nursing which will ultimately improve the quality and safety of healthcare as well as population health outcomes. Over the next year, this expert panel of innovation leaders will continue to refine its recommendations and action plans to accelerate innovation in the nursing profession. This article describes the vision, process, and initial outcomes of this National Innovation Summit.

Sepsis.

This article provides an overview of the history of the sepsis definitions as well as an overview of the current understanding of the pathogenesis of sepsis. The evolution of the treatment bundles is also presented.

A blueprint for nursing innovation centers.

BACKGROUND: The interest in and demand for healthcare innovation has heightened amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Organizations are challenged to balance the goals of daily operations with innovation to stay relevant and compete in the marketplace. Innovation is critical for not only the success and sustainability of organizations, but the well-being of the faculty, staff, and clients they serve. PURPOSE: In this article, we present an overview of several Nursing Innovation Centers in the United States as well as examples of colleges without formal innovation centers but who are addressing innovation in their programs. METHODS: We examined the subjective experience of nursing innovation in seven colleges of nursing using semi-structured intervieweds and thematic analysis. FINDINGS: We discuss four themes for creating an innovation center or innovation focus and six themes important for sustainability and impact. In addition, we provide a working model for these themes and provide lessons learned along with trends and recommendations for the future. DISCUSSION: This information provides guidance and a framework for academic and practice organizations aspiring to create opportunities for innovation to flourish in their institutions. We also encourage leadership to critically evaluate and address biases in faculty hiring, research evaluation, publication practices, educational opportunities and mentoring to overcome the diversity innovation paradox.

Critical Care Helicopter Overtriage: A Failure Mode and Effects Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Overtriage (OT) of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) poses significant burden to multiple stakeholders. The project aims were to identify the following: 1) associated factors, 2) downstream effects, and 3) focus areas for change. METHODS: We undertook a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to evaluate our HEMS interfacility transport process. Data were collected from organizational finances and 3 key stakeholder groups: 1) interfacility patients transferred by HEMS in 2017 who were discharged from the receiving facility within 24 hours (n = 149), 2) flight registered nurses (n = 19), and 3) referring emergency medicine providers (EMPs) (n = 30) from the top HEMS users of 2017. The completed FMEA identified failure modes, the frequency and severity of effects, and unique risk profile numbers (RPNs). RESULTS: Twelve failure modes were identified with 30 potential causes. Leading failure modes included inappropriate HEMS requests by EMPs (RPN = 343), inappropriate activation by EMS for interfacility transport (RPN = 343), and minimizing patient/family involvement in decision making (RPN = 315). Significant burdens to organizational finances and flight registered nurse satisfaction were identified. CONCLUSION: Associated factors for interfacility HEMS OT, downstream effects, and areas for change were identified. EMP and emergency medical services practices, HEMS processes, and shared decision making may affect regional OT rates.

Creating an organizational model to support advanced practice.

The growing number of advanced practice providers in hospital systems has necessitated the establishment of centralized coordinating centers to manage core functions related to regulatory requirements and credentialing and to provide resources for research and evidence-based practice and practice model innovation. The Margaret D. Sovie Center for Advanced Practice was created at the University of Rochester Medical Center to meet these demands of more than 350 nurse practitioners. The authors describe the structure and functions of the center.

Incidence, pathogenesis, and management of sepsis: an overview.

Sepsis is a complex condition that occurs as a result of the systemic manifestation of infection. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality risks for critically ill patients. Assessment and monitoring aimed at early recognition and treatment, on the basis of evidence-based guidelines, are advocated for optimizing outcomes for patients with severe sepsis. Awareness of the risk factors, clinical signs and symptoms, pathophysiology, and updates in the management of sepsis can enhance the nursing care for patients with severe sepsis to promote best practices for sepsis care in the intensive care unit. This article reviews the incidence and pathophysiology of sepsis, highlighting updates in treatment and implications for nursing care.

Critical care nursing for older adults: pathophysiological and functional considerations.

The aging of the population brings into health care practice, including ICUs, an increasing prevalence of people with chronic conditions with corresponding expectations of eventual decline in function. These age-related health problems, however, do not have a precise moment of onset, nor a single and unambiguous cause. By their nature, chronic conditions do not have an end that can be modified easily, and ordinarily, they are related to parameters other than physiology alone. Aged individuals often are distinguished as a medicalized cohort on the basis of sheer numbers of comorbidities and predisposition toward frequent hospitalizations, without regard for the potential for adaptation to life despite complex health factors. Some care providers, health economists, and bioethicists propose using the existence of chronic conditions and assumed physical decompensation asa valid basis for restricting individuals and groups, by means of rationing, from consideration for intensive care and treatment. In view of studies demonstrating that covert rationing of ICU resources to critically ill older patients already is taking place, there isa need to continue to examine institutional policies that permit care providers to act as gatekeepers, ostensibly with benign intent, but presumably without patients' knowledge or acceptance. On the other hand, there is evidence that older ICU patients do equally well as younger and middle-aged patients in terms of discharge from the hospital with subsequent recovery of function. Thus, age alone is not a useful marker for limiting access to ICUs. Rather, a comprehensive evaluation is the foundation for diagnostic accuracy and health care decision-making for older individuals. Assessment and maintenance of the older person's functional status are fundamental concerns of geriatric and critical care specialists. Evaluation of an individual's baseline abilities in physical, mental, social, and psychological spheres is necessary before limitation of care realistically can be considered. Intensive care unit hospitalizations for catastrophic or critical illness are not necessarily terminal events. Ongoing functional assessment will help to illuminate the impact of chronicity on an older person's capacity for self care, and may help to guide health care decision-making regarding use of critical care resources. Accordingly, assuring equitable access to essential intensive care services, devoid of concerns about age constraints, will help to ensure the autonomy that is central to older adults' achievement of a fulfilling and productive old age.

Association of proinflammatory molecules with apoptotic markers and survival in critically ill multiple organ dysfunction patients.

Recent evidence supports the involvement of apoptosis in multiple organ dysfunction (MODS). The authors examined the hypothesis that nitric oxide (NO), interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and cortisol correlate with Fas and Fas ligand (FasL) expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and that Fas and FasL, therefore, mediate their association with MODS severity. Thirty-five critically ill adult MODS patients were followed for up to 14 days and were compared to non-MODS matched controls. Fas, FasL, nitrate, cortisol, and IL-6 were elevated in MODS patients (P < 0.05). Nitrate and cortisol correlated with Fas expression (P < 0.05). All factors studied, except for TNF-alpha, correlated with MODS severity (P < 0.05); however, by multivariate analyses, Fas and FasL were independently associated with severity and survival (P < 0.05). The inflammatory molecules studied may mediate the association of apoptotic constituents with MODS severity and survival only in part.

Deconstructing the myth of the advanced practice blended role: support for role divergence.

Since the early 1980s, there has been discussion about combining the clinical nurse specialist (CNS) and nurse practitioner (NP) roles. Examination of recent nursing literature reveals renewed interest in differentiating, rather than combining, these 2 advanced practice roles. Research has shown that although the 2 roles share similarities, these advanced practice pursuits are more different than alike, both philosophically and practically. Despite curricular attempts at "blending" CNS and NP philosophies of nursing care and their distinctive domains of practice in master's level degree programs, the uniqueness of these roles in actual practice demands a continuation of educational differentiation in preparation. Both roles are important and address varied systems requirements. Each role has been shaped by population needs, education, market, and legal forces that transform with time. The differing ideologies of CNS and NP practice lead to diverse patient and system outcomes and reveal different researchable questions.

New perspectives on advanced practice nursing case management for aging patients.

Providing case management for older individuals is challenging in that this group rarely fits any DRG or managed-care mold. Because many people are living healthier and longer lives, intergenerational family dynamics such as that observed in Sophie and Leo's case may become more the norm than the exception. Well-intentioned family members, lacking the guidance of an experienced gerontologic APN case manager, may inadvertently place their aged loved ones at risk by attempting to arrive at health care, social, and housing solutions on their own. Even though 82-year-old Sophie stated subjectively that she "felt better than ever", an objective clinical assessment revealed that she still was in a convalescent period following major abdominal surgery at the same time that she was faced with providing in-home care for Leo, her 102-year old father. Sophie may have experienced response shift, or a reconceptualization of her own health state, in the aftermath of serious illness. The advanced practice knowledge and skills, systems acumen, talents, and creativity of two APN case managers in two different states contributed to successful health and social outcomes for two "master survivors," whose longevity and clinical presentations exceeded expectations. The value of APNs as case managers is clear: APNs possess the proficiency, tenacity, knowledge base, and nursing confidence needed to make a positive contribution toward individualizing care for members of the greatest generation.