Digital technology and healthcare delivery in insulin-treated adults with diabetes: a proposal for analysis of self-monitoring blood glucose patterns using a dedicated platform.

PURPOSE: A remote platform for diabetes care (Roche Diabetes® Care Platform, RDCP) has been developed that allows combined face-to-face consultations and remote patient monitoring (RPM). METHODS: A dedicated flowchart is proposed as a clinical approach to help healthcare professionals in the appropriate interpretation of structured self-monitoring blood glucose data, as visualized on the RDCP during the visits, and in the optimal management of patients using the integrated RDCP-RPM tools. RESULTS: The platform organizes patterns in different blocks: (i) hypoglycemia; (ii) hyperglycemia; (iii) blood glucose variability; (iv) treatment adherence, which identifies a possible individual pattern according to glycemic control challenges, potential causal factors, and behavioral type patterns. The flowchart proposed for use of the RDCP-RPM is self-explanatory and entails 3 steps: (1) evaluation of quality and quantity of self-monitoring blood glucose data; (2) pattern analysis; (3) personalized suggestions and therapy changes. CONCLUSION: The main aim of the remote treatment flowchart proposed is to support healthcare professionals in the identification of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic patterns using the RDCP regardless of the HbA1c value and ongoing treatment, which however, become crucial in combination with pattern analysis in the therapeutical choice.

Evaluation of a digital tool supporting therapeutic decision making for the personalized management of patients with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin: A pilot study.

AIMS: To investigate the benefits of using the Personalized Treatment Tool (PTT), a web-based clinical decision support tool assisting the diabetologist in the evaluation of patient's clinical characteristics and SMBG data, in the management of patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes and inadequate glucose control. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, 16-week, cluster-randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients with 64.3 ± 9.4 years of age, disease duration 13.2 ± 9.1 years and HbA1c 7.8 ± 0.6%, 41 in the PTT group and 41 in the control group, completed the study. At follow-up, changes in indicators of glucose control and variability were not statistically different between the two groups. However, when considering the subgroup of patients on a single anti-diabetes drug at baseline (9 in the PTT group, 14 in the control group), changes in HbA1c and CGM-derived TIR 70-140 mg/dl, 24-hour MSG, GRADE, and HBGI were significantly improved in the PTT group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: When performed in a structured manner and used to modify the diabetes therapy through an algorithm-driven digital tool, SMBG can lead to significant improvements of glycemic control and variability in patients with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin.

Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose is associated with more appropriate therapeutic interventions than unstructured self-monitoring: A novel analysis of data from the PRISMA trial.

AIMS: To investigate the relationship between single therapeutic interventions and indicatorsofglycemic control in the PRISMA trial, a large study comparing the effects of intensive structured SMBG (ISM) vs. active control (AC) in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Information was collected at four time points, corresponding to months 3, 6, 9, and 12 and visits 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Data on therapeutic interventions, HbA1c levels and the number of hypoglycemic episodes at each visit were analyzed. RESULTS: Intensification of drug therapy occurred in 20.3% vs. 15.6%, and no change in 71.8% vs. 78.7% of visits for the ISM and AC groups, respectively. On the other hand, de-intensification and redistribution of drugs and/or drug dose occurred in a similar proportion of visits. Intensification of drug therapy in both groups was associated with significant reductions in HbA1c vs. the previous visit, while de-intensification of therapy led to a significant increase in HbA1c in the AC group only. CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly support that structured SMBG has clinical value in reducing HbA1c in non-insulin-treated T2D and suggest that this clinical benefit may be mediated by more appropriate and timely changes in drug therapy.

The Burden of Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose on Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life and Locus of Control in Patients with Noninsulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: The PRISMA Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is associated with changes in diabetes-specific quality of life (DSQoL) and locus of control (LOC) in patients with noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this analysis of the PRISMA (Prospective Randomized Trial on Intensive SMBG Management Added Value in Noninsulin-Treated T2DM Patients) Study psychosocial data, we evaluated the impact of 12 months of structured SMBG on the individual domains of DSQoL and LOC questionnaires, including the role of selected confounders. RESULTS: The score for Satisfaction, Impact, and Worry domains (DSQoL) improved when compared with baseline, without significant differences between structured SMBG regimen (intervention group, n = 501) and active control group (n = 523). Scores for Internal, Chance, and Powerful Others domains (LOC) improved compared with baseline, with a significant between-group change in Chance (P = 0.0309). For DSQoL domain score, improvements were associated with higher number of SMBG measurements (P = 0.007), older age (P = 0.013), and male sex (P = 0.0133) for Satisfaction and with male sex (P < 0.0001) for Worry. Concerning LOC domain score, improvements were associated with longer diabetes duration (P = 0.0084) and younger age (P < 0.0001) for Chance and total number of SMBG measurements (P = 0.0036) for Internal, with the intervention group close to being significant (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrates that in patients with noninsulin-treated T2DM, structured SMBG is not associated with a deterioration of quality of life and LOC, which is strongly predicted by demographics and diabetes-related variables. These findings should be considered when tailoring educational support to SMBG for these patients.