New guidelines for lupus anticoagulant: sensitivity and specificity of cut-off values calculated with plasmas from healthy controls in mixing and confirmatory tests.

INTRODUCTION: The updated guidelines for lupus anticoagulant (LA) diagnosis indicate locally calculate the cut-off values of the index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) and the clotting time in seconds (s) for mixing studies and % of correction (%C) for confirmatory tests. We assess sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPC) of the cut-off values obtained as the 99th percentile from 60 plasmas of healthy individuals. METHODS: We analysed 647 plasmas from patients studied in the last 3 years, and results were revaluated according to the new criteria and cut-off values. Four hundred and three had LA, and 75 of them were under oral anticoagulants (OA). We performed three screening tests: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), diluted Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and dilute prothrombin time (dPT), and previous diagnosis was carried out using our home-made cut-off calculated by receiver operating characteristics curves. We reanalysed the mixing and confirmatory data of APTT/dRVVT, the tests selected in the new guidelines. To evaluate SPC, 244 plasmas (160 OA and 84 congenital deficient patients) were studied. RESULTS: Considering mixing studies, the cut-off values demonstrate that SEN of ICA-APTT was 94% and of clotting time in second (s) 83%, with an SPC of 77% and 84%, respectively. For ICA-dRVVT, SEN was 72% and for clotting time in second (s) 77%, with SPC of 98% and 84%, respectively. The cut-off values for %C for confirmatory APTT show good SEN 82% and high SPC 96%; for confirmatory dRVVT lower SEN 77%, but a SPC of 100%. CONCLUSION: The combination of mixing and confirmatory tests interpreted according to the new guidelines can clearly differentiate LA from other coagulopathies.

Central retinal vein occlusion and thrombophilia risk factors.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of risk factors predisposing to thrombosis in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). We prospectively examined 37 consecutive patients with CRVO, and 144 healthy controls, for major and potential inherited and acquired thrombophilic risk factors. Among them, only the prevalence of hyperhomocysteinaemia (10/37, 27.0%) and antiphospholipid antibodies positivity (5/37, 13.5%) were significantly higher in patients with respect to controls (5.5%, P < 0.001 and 2.1%, P < 0.01, respectively). Both hyperhomocysteinaemia and antiphospholipid antibodies seem to be associated with CRVO. A search for acquired thrombophilia is advisable in patients with CRVO.

Major and potential prothrombotic genotypes in a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism.

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin 20210A (PT-20210A) variant are well-known risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VT). The thermolabile variant (TT) of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, and homozygosity for the 4G allele of the promoter region of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are potential genetic polymorphisms that have not been consistently associated with increased risk of VT. A case-control study was performed on 192 consecutive unrelated patients referred for evaluation of thrombophilia because of VT and 200 healthy controls. FVL was found in 10.4% of patients compared to 3.0% of controls, while 6.3% of patients were carriers of the PT-20210A allele compared to 2.0% of controls. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) were 5.92 and 4.03 for FVL (P=.001) and the PT-20210A (P=.033), respectively. The prevalence of homozygotes for MTHFR (TT) and PAI-1 (4G/4G) among patients and controls were 13.7% versus 13.0% and 21.6% versus 23.5%, respectively (P=ns). A total of 121 patients underwent a complete screening for FVL, the PT-20210A, protein C (PC), protein S (PS), antithrombin III (ATIII), levels of factor VIII, and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). In 59 patients (48.8%) at least one defect was found, being a single defect in 55 and combined defects in 4 patients. Plasma levels of homocysteine (Hcy) were measured in 138 patients and 144 controls. Subjects from both groups carrying the MTHFR-TT variant had higher Hcy levels than those with the normal genotype. Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) by itself is a risk factor for VT (OR 4.92, P<.0001). We conclude that FVL and the PT-20210A are risk factors for VT as well as Hcy levels, but the MTHFR and PAI-1 polymorphisms do not appear to be associated with VT in our country.

Thrombophilic factors in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTE-PH) is an infrequent cause of pulmonary hypertension that develops in 0.1-0.2% of patients who survive after an acute venous thromboembolic event. According to the largest series so far reported, 15-30% of patients with diagnosis of CTE-PH have an underlying congenital or acquired hypercoagulable state. To determine the prevalence of thrombophilic factors in our population, we analyzed 24 patients admitted to our institution between November 1992 and March 2000 fulfilling criteria for CTE-PH. Eighteen patients disclosed abnormal results in the screening for thrombophilia. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin antibodies) was the abnormality most frequently found (12 out of 24 patients). We found hyperhomocysteinaemia in 7/14, true protein S deficiency in 1/10, protein C deficiency in 1/13, activated protein C resistance in 1/22, antithrombin III deficiency in 1/24, and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation in 1/18 patients. Factor V Leiden was normal in all 18 patients studied. Five patients (20.8%) disclosed more than one thrombophilic abnormality. In conclusion, contrary to the largest series of patients with CTE-PH so far reported, we found that 75% of patients with CTE-PH presented at least one thrombophilic risk factor, being antiphospholipid antibodies in 50% of the cases. We recommend a thorough screening for thrombophilia in all patients with diagnosis of CTE-PH.

The combination of thrombophilic genotypes is associated with definite antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity are clinical features of the definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These clinical complications are also associated with the presence of inherited thrombophilias. Interactions between acquired and genetic risk factors are becoming increasingly related to a higher thrombotic risk. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of four common gene polymorphisms in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). DESIGN AND METHODS: A series of 105 consecutive unselected patients with aPL grouped as having APS (n= 69) and not having APS (n= 36) was studied. A control group of 200 healthy subjects was also investigated for the presence of factor V Leiden (FVL), the 20210A allele of the prothrombin (PT-20210A) gene, the thermolabile variant (677TT) of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and the 4G/4G genotype of the plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) promoter. RESULTS: Two patients who belong to the APS group carried the FVL while PT-20210A was found in 6 patients with APS (8.7%) and in 1 of the non-APS group (2.8%). The prevalence of FVL was similar to that found in the control group whereas PT-20210A was significantly more frequent in APS patients than in normal controls (2.0%, p=0.02). The MTHFR-677TT was found in 22.0%, 15.1% and 13.0%, and the PAI-1 (4G/4G) in 27.5%, 22.8% and 23.5% of APS, non-APS patients and normal controls, respectively. Furthermore, combinations of PT-20210A or FVL with PAI-1 (4G/4G) were significantly more frequent in APS patients (5.8%) than in normal controls (0.5%, p=0.016). This difference was not found between non-APS patients and normal subjects. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Present data indicate that testing for heritable thrombophilia would be important to identify aPL subjects with an increased risk of developing APS.

Occurrence of anti-prothrombin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies in patients with history of thrombosis.

New evidence indicates that antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein I (anti-beta2GPI) or to human prothrombin (anti-II)(or to both of these) are specific markers of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). They have been mainly associated with thrombotic complications in patients with APS. However, some studies have reported that elevated levels of anti-II, but not of anfi-beta2GPI, imply a risk of venous thrombosis (VT) or arterial thrombosis (AT) in subjects with no previous thrombosis and no antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) by ELISA. The present study Included 180 patients with a history of thrombosis, 83 of them without aPL (group I) and the remaining 97 diagnosed as having APS (group II). Anti-beta2GPI was found in only 1 of the 83 patients from group I but was found in approximately 50% of those from group II (P < .0001). In contrast, positive anti-II was detected with a high prevalence in patients from group I (VT, 22.6%; AT, 26.7%) and in those from group II (VT, 37.5%; AT, 14.6%). No statistical differences were found in the prevalence of anti-II between the two groups of patients. On the other hand, such a difference was significant when compared with results in a normal group (1/67, 1.4%, P < .0001). These data Indicate that anti-II occurs frequently in patients with previous thrombosis either with or without lupus anticoagulant activity. Accordingly, testing of anti-II might be clinically useful in the evaluation for thrombophilla.

Antiplatelet factor 4--heparin antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Antibodies directed against platelet factor 4-heparin are present in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Additionally, it has been suggested that heparin can be an antigenic target of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We investigated the presence of heparin-platelet factor 4-induced antibodies (HPIA) in 33 patients with aPL. There were 30 patients with lupus anticoagulant, 25 with anticardiolipin antibodies, 21 with anti-beta2 glycoprotein I, and 18 with antiprothrombin antibodies. 20 patients had a history of thrombosis and 19 had received heparin during the last 60 months. We found 7 (21.2%) who had HPIA; 5 of them also had anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies. Four patients had severe thrombocytopenia and suspicion of HIT. Among them, two presented high positive HPIA results, one of them with positive platelet aggregation test. The third patient showed grey zone HPIA and borderline aggregation test and the fourth one had negative results. Among patients without a history of HIT, 2 who had never received heparin presented high positive, one a moderate positive, and one a grey zone HPIA result; all of them with negative aggregation tests. Five positive sera samples were incubated with cardiolipin liposomes in the presence of beta2 glycoprotein I, and whereas an inhibition greater than 50% was achieved in anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I activities, HPIA results did not change. We demonstrate that HPIA could be frequently found in patients with aPL. They are responsible for HIT in some cases but can also be found in patients who have not received heparin. Whether they predispose patients with aPL to HIT is not known; nevertheless, a close follow-up of heparin treatment in these patients seems to be mandatory.

Early occlusion of coronary by-pass associated with the presence of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin 20210A allele: case report.

The presence of factor V Leiden mutation and the variation of the prothrombin gene 20210GA have been described as additional risk factors for arterial thrombosis when other acquired or metabolic risk factors are present. We report here a 56-year-old man who developed coronary artery disease since 1980 without any known risk factor and underwent a cardiopulmonary by-pass in 1997. In the first month after surgery, he became symptomatic, and an angiography showed complete occlusion of the grafts and some native coronary arteries. Three months after the second cardiopulmonary by-pass, a thrombophilic state was searched, and plasma levels of lipoprotein (a) (LPa) were measured. The patient is heterozygous for factor V Leiden mutation and has the variation 20210GA of the prothrombin gene and high levels of LPa. These findings induced us to add oral anticoagulation to the aspirin treatment, and the patient is in a good condition 11 months later.

Anticuerpos anti-beta, glicoproteína I y niveles plasmáticos de la proteína de unión a C4b / Antibodies against beta glycoprotein I and C4b binding protein plasmatic levels

Autoantibodies directed to beta2 glycoprotein I (a beta 2 GPI) are frequently found in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). They are more strongly associated with clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome then a PL. It has been shown that beta2 GPI and C4b bibding protein (C4bBP) share certain homology. In a previous study we have shown that anticardiolipin antibodies were associated with a plasma decrease of C4bBP. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in 131 patients with a PL whether the decrease in C4bBP is related to the presence of abeta2 GPI. Lower C4bBP levels (mean +- SD) in the group of patients having abeta2 GPI (n=57) were observed when compared with the normal group (n=44), (74.3 porciento +-28.1 vs 94.6 porciento +-20.9,p<0.005).This difference was more significant consideing the IgG isotype. The group of patients with positive abeta2GPI-igG (n=41) had lower values of C4bBP (70.1 porciento +- 26.8) than both the normal group (p<0.005) and the group of patients with negative abeta2 IgG (n=90, 86.0 porciento +- 30.5 porciento, p<0.05). C4bBP deficiency (level <70 porciento) was also morefrequent in the group abeta 2GPI-IgG (+) (63.4 porciento) then in the group abeta2GPI-IgG 8-) (34.4 porciento, p<0.005). Moreover, patients with a PL and previews venous thrombosis (n=32) showed lower C4bBP values (75.1 porciento +- 27.9) compared with the normal group (p<0.05). As this time, the mechanisms responsibles for the C4bBP decrease are not known. Our findings on the close relationship between abnormalitiesin the C4bBP/protein S system and the presence of abeta2GPI could explain the major thrombotic risk in patients havingthese autoantibodies

Anticuerpos anti-beta, glicoproteína I y niveles plasmáticos de la proteína de unión a C4b / Antibodies against beta glycoprotein I and C4b binding protein plasmatic levels

Autoantibodies directed to beta2 glycoprotein I (a beta 2 GPI) are frequently found in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). They are more strongly associated with clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome then a PL. It has been shown that beta2 GPI and C4b bibding protein (C4bBP) share certain homology. In a previous study we have shown that anticardiolipin antibodies were associated with a plasma decrease of C4bBP. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in 131 patients with a PL whether the decrease in C4bBP is related to the presence of abeta2 GPI. Lower C4bBP levels (mean +- SD) in the group of patients having abeta2 GPI (n=57) were observed when compared with the normal group (n=44), (74.3 porciento +-28.1 vs 94.6 porciento +-20.9,p<0.005).This difference was more significant consideing the IgG isotype. The group of patients with positive abeta2GPI-igG (n=41) had lower values of C4bBP (70.1 porciento +- 26.8) than both the normal group (p<0.005) and the group of patients with negative abeta2 IgG (n=90, 86.0 porciento +- 30.5 porciento, p<0.05). C4bBP deficiency (level <70 porciento) was also morefrequent in the group abeta 2GPI-IgG (+) (63.4 porciento) then in the group abeta2GPI-IgG 8-) (34.4 porciento, p<0.005). Moreover, patients with a PL and previews venous thrombosis (n=32) showed lower C4bBP values (75.1 porciento +- 27.9) compared with the normal group (p<0.05). As this time, the mechanisms responsibles for the C4bBP decrease are not known. Our findings on the close relationship between abnormalitiesin the C4bBP/protein S system and the presence of abeta2GPI could explain the major thrombotic risk in patients havingthese autoantibodies (AU)

Activated protein C resistance in patients with anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies.

To evaluate if the presence of anti-beta 2GPI antibodies (a beta 2GPI) is associated with activated protein C resistance (APC-R) phenotype, we performed the APC-R APTT-based assay in 74 plasma samples from patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Samples were diluted 1:5 in factor V-deficient plasma. Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and a beta 2GPI (IgG and IgM) were also performed. A control group of 22 healthy volunteers was used. The prevalence of reduced APC-R ratio in patients with aPL was significantly higher than in normal controls (31.1 vs 4.5%, P < 0.05) and the mean APC-R ratio was lower (mean +/- SD; 2.32 +/- 0.40 vs 2.55 +/- 0.21, P < 0.02). There were no differences in the prevalence of APC-R and the ratio values between LA(+) and LA(-). Among the LA(+), the aCL(+) had a higher prevalence of APC-R than the aCL(-) (P < 0.01) and lower APC-R ratios (P < 0.01). The latter group was no different to normal controls. Anti-beta 2GPI antibodies were associated with a higher prevalence of APC-R (50.0 vs 19.6%, P < 0.001), and lower APC-R ratios (2.15 +/- 0.41 vs 2.42 +/- 0.35, P < 0.005), compared with a beta 2GPI(-). In conclusion, the acquired APC-R in patients with aPL seems to be associated with aCL and a beta 2GPI rather than an in vitro interference by LA.