Preclinical optimization of MDM2 antagonist scheduling for cancer treatment by using a model-based approach.

PURPOSE: Antitumor clinical activity has been demonstrated for the MDM2 antagonist RG7112, but patient tolerability for the necessary daily dosing was poor. Here, utilizing RG7388, a second-generation nutlin with superior selectivity and potency, we determine the feasibility of intermittent dosing to guide the selection of initial phase I scheduling regimens. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model was developed on the basis of preclinical data to determine alternative dosing schedule requirements for optimal RG7388-induced antitumor activity. This PKPD model was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of RG7388 linked to the time-course of the antitumor effect in an osteosarcoma xenograft model in mice. These data were used to prospectively predict intermittent and continuous dosing regimens, resulting in tumor stasis in the same model system. RESULTS: RG7388-induced apoptosis was delayed relative to drug exposure with continuous treatment not required. In initial efficacy testing, daily dosing at 30 mg/kg and twice a week dosing at 50 mg/kg of RG7388 were statistically equivalent in our tumor model. In addition, weekly dosing of 50 mg/kg was equivalent to 10 mg/kg given daily. The implementation of modeling and simulation on these data suggested several possible intermittent clinical dosing schedules. Further preclinical analyses confirmed these schedules as viable options. CONCLUSION: Besides chronic administration, antitumor activity can be achieved with intermittent schedules of RG7388, as predicted through modeling and simulation. These alternative regimens may potentially ameliorate tolerability issues seen with chronic administration of RG7112, while providing clinical benefit. Thus, both weekly (qw) and daily for five days (5 d on/23 off, qd) schedules were selected for RG7388 clinical testing.

Antitumor activity of capecitabine and bevacizumab combination in a human estrogen receptor-negative breast adenocarcinoma xenograft model.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and bevacizumab have each been shown to inhibit tumor growth. Their combination failed to improve survival in a phase III trial of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), although it should be noted patients had been heavily pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Our aim was to evaluate whether combination treatment would increase tumor growth inhibition and survival in a breast cancer model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice bearing KPL-4 human estrogen receptor-negative breast adenocarcinoma xenografts were given capecitabine orally daily for 14 days at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or half MTD, alone or with 5 mg/kg intraperitoneal bevacizumab twice weekly. RESULTS: Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) and increased life span (ILS) were superior in the combination groups versus monotherapy (p < 0.05). TGI and ILS were significantly improved in the high- versus low-dose capecitabine combination (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Capecitabine in combination with bevacizumab provides a basis for pursuing the combination for first-line treatment of MBC.

Antitumor activity of HER1/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib, alone and in combination with CPT-11 (irinotecan) in human colorectal cancer xenograft models.

Erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI-774) is a potent, orally available, small-molecule inhibitor of HER1/EGFR tyrosine-kinase activity. In this study, the antitumor activity of erlotinib was evaluated in two human colorectal tumor xenograft models (LoVo and HCT116) in athymic mice. When erlotinib was administered as monotherapy, significant tumor growth inhibition (TGI) was seen in the LoVo model at both 100 mg/kg [TGI > 100%, P < 0.001; 6/10 partial regressions (PRs)] and 25 mg/kg (TGI = 79%, P < 0.001) doses. However, the HCT116 xenograft model was not responsive to any dose of erlotinib tested. The differential response to erlotinib of these two tumor models was not a result of differences in HER1/EGFR expression levels since these were similar in both cell lines. However, it was demonstrated that resistance to erlotinib in the HCT116 model may be a result of persistent activation of ERK in these tumors. Based on the single agent activity of erlotinib in LoVo tumors, a combination study with CPT-11 (Camptosar, irinotecan) was performed. CPT-11 at the optimal dose of 60 mg/kg or a lower dose of 15 mg/kg resulted in significant TGI (TGI > 100%, P < 0.001, and TGI = 93%, P < 0.001, respectively) in LoVo-bearing mice. Combination treatment with erlotinib (25 mg/kg) and CPT-11 (15 mg/kg) produced significantly greater antitumor activity (TGI > 100%, P < 0.001; 10/10 PRs) than either agent alone (P < 0.05), with no increase in toxicity. These data indicate that erlotinib can enhance the antitumor activity of CPT-11, without enhanced toxicity, in the LoVo human colorectal tumor xenograft model.

Antitumor activity of erlotinib (OSI-774, Tarceva) alone or in combination in human non-small cell lung cancer tumor xenograft models.

Our objective was the preclinical assessment of the pharmacokinetics, monotherapy and combined antitumor activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in athymic nude mice bearing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenograft models. Immunohistochemistry determined the HER1/EGFR status of the NSCLC tumor models. Pharmacokinetic studies assessed plasma drug concentrations of erlotinib in tumor- and non-tumor-bearing athymic nude mice. These were followed by maximum tolerated dose (MTD) studies for erlotinib and each chemotherapy. Erlotinib was then assessed alone and in combination with these chemotherapies in the NSCLC xenograft models. Complete necropsies were performed on most of the animals in each study to further assess antitumor or toxic effects. Erlotinib monotherapy dose-dependently inhibited tumor growth in the H460a tumor model, correlating with circulating levels of drug. There was antitumor activity at the MTD with each agent tested in both the H460a and A549 tumor models (erlotinib 100 mg/kg: 71 and 93% tumor growth inhibition; gemcitabine 120 mg/kg: 93 and 75% tumor growth inhibition; cisplatin 6 mg/kg: 81 and 88% tumor growth inhibition). When each compound was given at a fraction of the MTD, tumor growth inhibition was suboptimal. Combinations of gemcitabine or cisplatin with erlotinib were assessed at 25% of the MTD to determine efficacy. In both NSCLC models, doses of gemcitabine (30 mg/kg) or cisplatin (1.5 mg/kg) with erlotinib (25 mg/kg) at 25% of the MTD were well tolerated. For the slow growing A549 tumor, there was significant tumor growth inhibition in the gemcitabine/erlotinib and cisplatin/erlotinib combinations (above 100 and 98%, respectively), with partial regressions. For the faster growing H460a tumor, there was significant but less remarkable tumor growth inhibition in these same combinations (86 and 53% respectively). These results show that in NSCLC xenograft tumors with similar levels of EGFR expression, the antitumor activity of erlotinib is robust both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapies.