KDIGO clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors

The 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors is intended to assist medical professionals who evaluate living kidney donor candidates and provide care before, during and after donation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies that included critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations. However, many recommendations, for which there was no evidence or no systematic search for evidence was undertaken by the Evidence Review Team, were issued as ungraded expert opinion recommendations. The guideline work group concluded that a comprehensive approach to risk assessment should replace decisions based on assessments of single risk factors in isolation. Original data analyses were undertaken to produce a "proof-in-concept" risk-prediction model for kidney failure to support a framework for quantitative risk assessment in the donor candidate evaluation and defensible shared decision making. This framework is grounded in the simultaneous consideration of each candidate's profile of demographic and health characteristics. The processes and framework for the donor candidate evaluation are presented, along with recommendations for optimal care before, during, and after donation. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, especially regarding the lack of definitive prospective studies and clinical outcome trials. Suggestions for future research, including the need for continued refinement of long-term risk prediction and novel approaches to estimating donation-attributable risks, are also provided.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

The 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors is intended to assist medical professionals who evaluate living kidney donor candidates and provide care before, during and after donation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies that included critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations. However, many recommendations, for which there was no evidence or no systematic search for evidence was undertaken by the Evidence Review Team, were issued as ungraded expert opinion recommendations. The guideline work group concluded that a comprehensive approach to risk assessment should replace decisions based on assessments of single risk factors in isolation. Original data analyses were undertaken to produce a "proof-in-concept" risk-prediction model for kidney failure to support a framework for quantitative risk assessment in the donor candidate evaluation and defensible shared decision making. This framework is grounded in the simultaneous consideration of each candidate's profile of demographic and health characteristics. The processes and framework for the donor candidate evaluation are presented, along with recommendations for optimal care before, during, and after donation. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, especially regarding the lack of definitive prospective studies and clinical outcome trials. Suggestions for future research, including the need for continued refinement of long-term risk prediction and novel approaches to estimating donation-attributable risks, are also provided.In citing this document, the following format should be used: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Living Kidney Donor Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation. 2017;101(Suppl 8S):S1-S109.

Summary of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) engaged an evidence review team and convened a work group to produce a guideline to evaluate and manage candidates for living kidney donation. The evidence for most guideline recommendations is sparse and many "ungraded" expert consensus recommendations were made to guide the donor candidate evaluation and care before, during, and after donation. The guideline advocates for replacing decisions based on assessments of single risk factors in isolation with a comprehensive approach to risk assessment using the best available evidence. The approach to simultaneous consideration of each candidate's profile of demographic and health characteristics advances a new framework for assessing donor candidate risk and for defensible shared decision making.

Pancreas transplantation: lessons learned from a decade of experience at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.

This article reviews the outcome of pancreas transplantations in diabetic recipients according to risk factors, surgical techniques, and immunosuppression management that evolved over the course of a decade at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. A randomized trial of alemtuzumab versus rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) at our institution demonstrated lower rates of acute rejection and infection in the alemtuzumab group. Consequently, alemtuzumab induction has been used exclusively in all pancreas transplantations since February 2009. Early steroid elimination has been feasible in the majority of patients. Extensive experience with surveillance pancreas biopsies in solitary pancreas transplantation (SPT) is described. Surveillance pancreas biopsy-directed immunosuppression has contributed to equivalent long-term pancreas graft survival rates in SKPT and SPT recipients at our center, in contrast to recent registry reports of persistently higher rates of immunologic pancreas graft loss in SPT. Furthermore, the impact of donor and recipient selection on outcomes is explored. Excellent results have been achieved with older (extended) donors and recipients, in recipients of organs from donation after cardiac death donors managed with extracorporeal support, and in African-American patients. Type 2 diabetics with detectable C-peptide levels have been transplanted successfully with outcomes comparable to those of insulinopenic diabetics. Our experiences are discussed in the light of findings reported in the literature.

A randomized trial of alemtuzumab versus antithymocyte globulin induction in renal and pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND.: Alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) are commonly used for induction of immunsuppression for kidney and pancreas transplantation, but the two agents have not been compared directly. METHODS.: We conducted a prospective randomized single-center trial comparing alemtuzumab and rATG induction in adult kidney and pancreas transplantation in patients treated with similar maintenance immunosuppression. RESULTS.: Between February 1, 2005, and September 1, 2007, 222 patients randomly received either alemtuzumab (n=113) or rATG (n=109) induction; 180 (81%) underwent kidney alone, 38 (17%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney, and 4 (2%) pancreas after kidney transplants. Of 180 kidney-alone transplants, 152 (84%) were from deceased donors, including 61 (34%) from expanded criteria donors. Retransplantation, human leukocyte antigen match, antibody titer, expanded criteria donors, race, cytomegalovirus status, delayed graft function, and immunologic risks were similar between the two induction groups. With a median follow-up of 2 years (minimum 1 year), overall patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 96%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. Survival, initial length of stay, and maintenance immunosuppression (including early steroid elimination) were similar between alemtuzumab and rATG groups, but biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) episodes occurred in 16 (14%) alemtuzumab patients compared with 28 (26%) rATG patients (P=0.02). Late BPAR (>12 months after transplant) occurred in 1 (8%) alemtuzumab patient and 3 (11%) rATG patients (P=NS). Infections and malignancy were similar between the two induction arms. CONCLUSION.: Alemtuzumab and rATG induction therapies were equally safe, but alemtuzumab was associated with less BPAR.

Experience in renal and extrarenal transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors with selective use of extracorporeal support.

BACKGROUND: Most reports of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are exclusive to kidney transplantation and report high rates of delayed graft function (DGF). STUDY DESIGN: From April 1, 2003, to October 3, 2007, we performed 53 kidney transplantations and 4 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations from DCD donors. All DCD donor kidneys were managed with pulsatile perfusion preservation, and all simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation donors were managed with extracorporeal support. RESULTS: Of 53 DCD kidney transplantations, 44 (83%) were from standard criteria donors (SCD) and 9 (17%) from expanded criteria donors (ECD). With a mean followup of 12 months, actual patient and kidney graft survival rates were 94% and 87%, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates were 100% in the 4 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations. Incidence of DGF was 57% (60% without versus 20% with extracorporeal support, p = 0.036). Comparison of the 53 DCD donor kidney transplantations with 316 concurrent donation after brain death (DBD) donor adult kidney transplantations (178 SCD, 138 ECD) revealed no differences in demographics or outcomes, except that the DCD donor group had fewer ECDs (17% DCD versus 44% DBD; p = 0.0002), fewer 0-antigen mismatch kidney transplantations (7.5% DCD versus 19% DBD; p = 0.05), and more kidneys preserved with pulsatile perfusion (100% DCD versus 52% DBD; p < 0.0001). Incidences of DGF (57% DCD versus 19% DBD; p < 0.0001) and acute rejection (19% DCD versus 10% DBD; p = 0.10) were higher in the DCD donor group, which resulted in a longer initial length of stay (mean 11 days DCD versus 8.0 days DBD; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high incidence of DGF in the absence of extracorporeal support and greater initial resource use, comparable short-term results can be achieved with DCD and DBD donor kidney transplantations.

Experience with deceased donor kidney transplantation in 114 patients over age 60.

BACKGROUND: In the recent past, advanced age was a contraindication to kidney transplantation (KT). The purpose of this study was to review retrospectively our single center experience in deceased donor (DD) KT with respect to recipient age. METHODS: From 10/1/01 to 9/1/06, we performed 356 adult DD KTs. Patients received antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and tapered steroids. RESULTS: A total of 114 (32%) patients were greater than 60 (including 25 >70 years), 186 (52%) were 40-59 years of age, and 56 (16%) were 19-39 years of age. Of the 114 older patients, 61 (54%) received KTs from expanded criteria DDs (ECD), more than the younger age groups (39% ECDs in patients 40-59 years versus 18% ECDs in patients 19-39 years, P < .0001). Mean waiting time (21 mo) was less for patients greater than 60 years compared with the other 2 groups combined (29 mo, P = .06). Patient survival was 91% in recipients greater than 60 years compared with 95% in those less than 60 years of age (P = NS) with a mean follow-up of 27 mo. Graft survival was similar for all 3 age groups (82% >60 years vs 83% in patients 40-59 years vs 87% in patients 19-39 years, P = NS). Initial and subsequent graft function, morbidity, and resource use were similar among groups. Patient survival [93% ECD vs 89% standard criteria DDs (SCD), P = NS) and graft survival (82% ECD vs 81% SCD, P = NS) rates were similar, whereas mean waiting times (18 mo ECD vs 25 mo SCD, P = .04) were less in patients greater than 60 years who received ECD KTs compared with patients greater than 60 years who received SCD KTs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients greater than 60 years account currently for one third of DD KTs performed at our center, and more than half receive kidneys from ECDs. By preferentially directing ECD kidneys to appropriately selected elderly patients, waiting times can be decreased and survival is similar compared with SCD KTs in the elderly. In addition, short-term outcomes can be achieved in patients greater than 60 years that are comparable with those in younger patients.

Dual kidney transplantation: a case-control comparison with single kidney transplantation from standard and expanded criteria donors.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a case-matched cohort analysis of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) compared to single kidney transplantation (SKT) from concurrent ECDs and standard criteria donors (SCDs, defined as non-ECD). METHODS: Deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants (KTs) performed at a single center between October 2001 and February 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. If the calculated DD creatinine clearance (CrCl) was <65 mL/min, then the kidneys were transplanted dually into a single patient. In the case of DKT and SKT from ECDs, low risk patients were chosen and informed consent was obtained. Patients in each group were matched for age, gender, race, transplant number, and time of transplant. RESULTS: Of 294 adult DD KTs performed, 16 (5%) were DKTs, which were matched with 16 concurrent SCD and 16 ECD SKT patients. Mean donor age in years (65 DKT vs. 33 SCD vs. 61 ECD; P<0.0001) and mean donor CrCl in ml/min (54 DKT vs. 91 SCD vs. 76 ECD; P=0.002) were different between groups. Patient survival was 100% in the DKT and SCD SKT groups and 94% in the ECD SKT group (mean follow up 23-28 months); graft survival rates in the DKT, SCD, and ECD groups were 81%, 81%, and 94%, respectively (P=NS). Graft function, rejection, and morbidity were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: DKT using kidneys from marginal ECDs is a viable option to counteract the growing shortage of available organs. Excellent short-term results and renal function can be achieved with older, low nephron mass donors provided that both kidneys are transplanted into a single recipient.

Influence of pulsatile perfusion preservation on outcomes in kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors.

BACKGROUND: Expanded criteria donors (ECDs) increase the donor organ pool, but the value of transplanting these kidneys has been questioned because of concerns about diminished survival, poorer renal function, and higher rates of delayed graft function. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of intermediate-term outcomes in ECD kidney transplantations according to method of preservation at a single center using a standardized approach. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, we performed 141 donations-after-brain-death ECD kidney transplantations into adult recipients. A total of 114 kidneys (81%) were managed with combined cold-storage and pulsatile perfusion preservation (PPP), and the remaining 27 (19%) were preserved with cold storage (CS). The PPP group had a higher proportion of kidneys preserved for longer than 30 hours (28% versus 0, p < 0.001) and a longer mean cold ischemia time (24.5 hours PPP versus 19 hours CS, p < 0.01). Other donor and recipient characteristics were similar between groups. Incidence of delayed graft function was 11% in PPP-stored kidneys versus 37% in CS kidneys (p = 0.002). With a mean followup of 27 months, patient (91% PPP versus 96% CS) and kidney graft survival (81% PPP versus 81.5% CS) rates were comparable. Mean 12-month serum creatinine (1.9 mg/dL) and calculated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease glomerular filtration rate (41 mL/min) values were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer cold ischemia times, recipients of ECD kidneys managed with PPP had similar survival and functional outcomes, but experienced a marked reduction in the rate of delayed graft function.

Experience with dual kidney transplants from donors at the extremes of age.

BACKGROUND: Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from donors at the extremes of age represents one approach to expanding the organ donor pool. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with DKT from older donors and en bloc KT (EBKT) from small pediatric donors. METHODS: Deceased donor KTs performed at our center between October 2001 and November 2005, were reviewed retrospectively. If the calculated creatinine clearance in an expanded criteria donor was <65 mL/min, then the kidneys were transplanted dually into a single adult recipient. If a pediatric donor weighed <15 kg, then the kidneys were transplanted en bloc. In both instances, low-risk recipients were chosen (primary transplant, low sensitization, body mass index <25 kg/m(2), human leukocyte antigen matching). Donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics, waiting time, and outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Of a total of 279 deceased donor KTs during the 49-month study period, 15 (5%) recipients underwent DKT and 5 (2%) underwent EBKT. Mean donor age was 65.4 years and 21.4 months in the DKT and EBKT groups, respectively. Patient survival rates in both groups were 100% with a mean follow-up of 22 months (minimum, 6 months). Kidney graft survival rates were 80% (12/15) and 60% (3/5) in the DKT and EBKT groups, respectively. The combined incidence of delayed graft function was 10%. Mean 12-month glomerular filtration rates were 46 mL/min and 66 mL/min in the DKT and EBKT groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DKT using kidneys from marginal elderly donors and EBKT from small pediatric donors appear to offer a viable option to counteract the shortage of acceptable kidney donors.

Reproduction and pregnancy in transplant recipients: current practices.

Many transplant physicians are faced with questions from their patients about the safety and long-term consequences of pregnancy following transplantation. To better understand how pregnancies are managed and to clarify the outcome of pregnancy after transplantation, a survey questionnaire was developed and mailed to all medical and surgical directors of transplant centers throughout the United States; responses were obtained from 59.1% of the transplant centers. Although many opinions were collected, most respondents conceded that their opinions were based on personal experience rather than evidence-based. The underutilization of existing information was revealing and highlighted a need for an evidence-based approach to care of the pregnant transplant recipient and her offspring. The survey results, reported in this article, led to formation of a consensus conference to determine the optimal approach to pregnant transplant recipients and to define what is currently known and unknown about reproduction and transplantation.

Intermediate-term outcomes with expanded criteria deceased donors in kidney transplantation: a spectrum or specter of quality?

OBJECTIVE: To compare intermediate-term outcomes in adult recipients of expanded criteria (ECD) versus concurrent standard criteria (SCD) deceased donor kidney transplants at a single center using a standardized approach. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Expanded criteria donors (ECDs) are a source of kidneys that increase the donor organ pool, but the value of transplanting these kidneys has been questioned because of concerns regarding diminished survival and predicted poorer intermediate-term outcomes. METHODS: Over a 47-month period, we performed 244 deceased donor kidney transplants into adult recipients, including 143 from SCDs and 101 from ECDs. Management algorithms were implemented to preserve nephron function, and recipient selection for an ECD kidney transplant was based on low immunologic risk. All patients received depleting antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. A total of 188 patients (77%) had at least a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: ECDs were older, had a higher BMI, had an increased incidence of cerebrovascular brain death and preexisting donor hypertension, and had a lower estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl, all P < 0.01) compared with SCDs. Cold ischemic times were similar between groups, but more ECD kidneys were preserved with pulsatile perfusion (P < 0.01). ECD kidney recipients were older, less sensitized, had a lower BMI, had fewer 0-antigen mismatches, and had a shorter waiting time (all P < 0.01) compared with SCD kidney recipients. Actual patient (93%) and kidney graft (83%) survival rates were similar between groups with a mean follow-up of 24 months. The rates of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, readmissions, operative complications, major infections, and resource utilization were comparable between groups. Renal function followed longitudinally was consistently better in SCD patients (P < 0.05). Black recipients had higher rates of DGF, acute rejection, and graft loss (P < 0.05), but the effects were less pronounced in the ECD group. CONCLUSIONS: By appropriate donor and recipient profiling and the use of management algorithms to project and protect renal function, excellent intermediate-term outcomes can be achieved with ECD kidney transplants that are comparable to SCD kidney transplants.

Long-term patient survival: strategies to improve overall health.

The use of potent immunosuppressant therapy has led to an increase in number of patients with successful long-term kidney transplants. These individuals come to kidney transplantation with varying levels of comorbidity associated with end-stage renal disease and are susceptible to immunologic and nonimmunologic comorbidities that arise late after transplantation, including cardiovascular disease, infection, malignancy, and bone disease, which negatively impact on patient and graft survival. In addition, nonadherence to immunosuppressant regimens increases with time after transplantation, which further augments the risk for late-term graft failure and mortality. Consistent and frequent follow-up of kidney transplant recipients beyond the first year permits early diagnosis and successful treatment of many posttransplantation comorbidities. Implementation of preventive practices and aggressive management of risk factors throughout the life of the transplant improves overall health and long-term outcomes. Establishment and maintenance of close relationships among transplant centers, physicians, patients, and their families improves patient adherence to medications and reduces the risk for morbidity and mortality.

Optimal use of older donors and recipients in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The aging donor and recipient population have led to new challenges in kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study was to review retrospectively our single center experience in deceased-donor kidney transplantation, with respect to donor and recipient age. METHODS: From October 1, 2001, through February 20, 2004, we performed 144 deceased-donor kidney transplantations, which included 37 procedures (26%) in recipients > or =60 years old and 107 procedures (74%) in recipients 19 to 59 years old. The deceased-donor pool included 57 expanded criteria donors (ECD) and 87 standard criteria donors (defined as not ECD). ECD kidneys were used by matching estimated renal functional mass to recipient size (body mass index, <25 kg/m(2)), which included the use of dual kidney transplantations (n = 9). ECD kidney recipients were further selected on the basis of age >40 years and low immunologic risk. Recipients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. RESULTS: The mean age differed between recipient groups (65 vs 46 years; P < .001). In recipients > or =60 years old, 23 recipients (62%) received kidney transplants from ECDs compared with 34 kidney transplants from ECDs (32%; P < .001) in recipients who were <60 years old. Patient survival was 89% in recipients who were > or =60 years old, compared with 95% in recipients who were <60 years old (P = .11), with a mean follow-up time of 27 months. Kidney graft survival rates were 84% in both recipient groups. Initial and subsequent graft function, rejection, infection, reoperation, length of stay, readmission, and resource use were similar among groups. CONCLUSION: By the matching of nephron mass with recipient size and avoiding the use of ECD kidneys in recipients with a high immunologic risk, short-term outcomes that are comparable with standard criteria donor kidneys in younger patients can be achieved with either older donors or recipients, regardless of age.

Massive immune hemolysis caused by anti-D after dual kidney transplantation.

Massive immune hemolysis due to passenger lymphocyte-derived anti-D has not been reported in renal transplantation. A 50-year-old (B-positive) male received a dual deceased-donor kidney transplant (B-negative) for diabetic renal failure. Two weeks post-transplant, the patient developed severe hemolytic anemia. The donor anti-D titer was 1:8. The recipient anti-D titer (zero pre-transplant) increased from 1:4 to 1:16 over 4 days. Rapid hemolysis caused severe anemia, minimum Hb = 4.2 g/dL, while selectively lysing the patient's autologous red cells during this time. The hemolytic anemia did not impair the allografts and subsided without monoclonal B-cell pharmacotherapy or apheresis. The anti-D titer decreased to barely detectable levels at four months and had cleared when checked 2 years post-transplant. Transfusion support subsided after two months. If complications of anemia can be avoided, the deleterious effects of hemolysis may be well tolerated by renal allografts using antigen negative transfusion alone.

Reproduction and transplantation: report on the AST Consensus Conference on Reproductive Issues and Transplantation.

It has been almost 50 years since the first child was born to a female transplant recipient. Since that time pregnancy has become common after transplantation, but physicians have been left to rely on case reports, small series and data from voluntary registries to guide the care of their patients. Many uncertainties exist including the risks that pregnancy presents to the graft, the patient herself, and the long-term risks to the fetus. It is also unclear how to best modify immunosuppressive agents or treat rejection during pregnancy, especially in light of newer agents available where pregnancy safety has not been established. To begin to address uncertainties and define clinical practice guidelines for the transplant physician and obstetrical caregivers, a consensus conference was held in Bethesda, Md. The conferees summarized both what is known and important gaps in our knowledge. They also identified key areas of agreement, and posed a number of critical questions, the resolution of which is necessary in order to establish evidence-based guidelines. The manuscript summarizes the deliberations and conclusions of the conference as well as specific recommendations based on current knowledge in the field.

Conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression using daclizumab bridge therapy in renal transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CI)-based maintenance immunosuppression to sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppression may be beneficial in selected renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a daclizumab (DAC) bridge protocol in patients converted from CI- to SRL-based maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of renal transplant recipients who were converted to SRL at least 2 months post-transplant. The protocol consisted of an abrupt discontinuation of either cyclosporin (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC), initiation of SRL within 48 h of CI discontinuation, and DAC 2 mg/kg at the time of CI discontinuation and again at 14 d (depending on the SRL serum concentration). The SRL starting dose was based on risk stratification in each patient. RESULTS: Twenty-one renal transplant patients were converted to SRL (11 from TAC, 10 from CsA) between October 2001 and July 2003. Conversion occurred at a mean of 23 months post-transplant. Indications for SRL conversion included 12 for chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), four for CI-associated neurotoxicity, two for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), two for post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), and one for polyomavirus interstitial nephritis (PVN). Mean follow-up was 16 months from time of conversion. Therapeutic SRL levels were reached at a mean of 14 d. Total serum cholesterol levels increased from a mean of 205 (+/- 47) to 234 (+/- 55) mg/dL (P = 0.014), and serum triglyceride levels increased from a mean of 186 (+/- 66) to 257 (+/- 88) mg/dL (P = 0.002). In addition, mean haemoglobin level decreased from 12.0 (+/- 2.3) to 10.5 (+/- 2.1) g/dL (P = 0.002); total white blood cell count decreased from 8300 (+/- 4300) to 4700 (+/- 1400)/mm(3) (P < 0.001); and platelet count decreased from 238 000 (+/- 72 800) to 186 000 (+/- 51 900)/mm(3) (P = 0.002) from before to after conversion. Patients experienced the following side-effects while taking SRL: diarrhoea (n = 6), peripheral oedema (n = 5), arthralgias (n = 4), anaemia (n = 4), oral ulcers (n = 1), deep vein thrombosis (n = 1), shortness of breath (n = 1), and mild increase in serum transaminases (n = 1). Two patients (9.5%) discontinued SRL due to side-effects, both secondary to severe arthralgias. There were two serious infections noted after conversion: one Pseudomonas aeruginosa urosepsis, and one PVN (that was ongoing prior to conversion). Patient survival was 100%, and kidney graft survival was 76%. Five patients (24%) lost their allograft after conversion due to progression of CAN (n = 2), persistent TMA in the kidney (n = 1), patient self-discontinuation of sirolimus (n = 1), and preexisting PVN unresponsive to cidofovir therapy (n = 1). Of the five patients who lost their allograft, the mean serum creatinine at the time of conversion was 3.5 (+/-1.1) mg/dL compared with 2.2 (+/- 0.8) mg/dL in patients who did not lose their allograft (P = 0.034). No acute rejection episodes occurred after conversion to sirolimus. CONCLUSIONS: DAC bridge therapy provides safe and effective immunosuppressive coverage while converting renal transplant recipients from CI- to SRL-based maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. A pharmacoeconomic analysis, however, is necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness of this conversion protocol.

Increased kidney transplantation utilizing expanded criteria deceased organ donors with results comparable to standard criteria donor transplant.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in recipients of expanded criteria donor (ECD) versus standard criteria donor (SCD) kidneys at a single center using a standardized approach with similar immunosuppression. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Expanded criteria deceased organ donors (ECD) are a source of kidneys that permit more patients to benefit from transplantation. ECD is defined as all deceased donors older than 60 years and donors older than 50 years with 2 of the following: hypertension, stroke as the cause of death, or pre-retrieval serum creatinine (SCr) greater than 1.5 mg/dl. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 90 recipients of adult deceased donor kidneys transplanted from October 1, 2001 to February 17, 2003, including 37 (41%) from ECDs and 53 (59%) from SCDs. ECD kidneys were used by matching estimated renal functional mass to recipient need, including the use of dual kidney transplants (n = 7). ECD kidney recipients were further selected on the basis of older age, HLA-matching, low allosensitization, and low body mass index. All patients received a similar immunosuppressive regimen. Minimum follow up was 9 months. RESULTS: There were significant differences in donor and recipient characteristics between ECD and SCD transplants. Patient (99%) and kidney graft survival (88%) rates and morbidity were similar between the 2 groups, with a mean follow-up of 16 months. Initial graft function and the mean 1-week and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-month SCr levels were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECD kidneys at our center effectively doubled our transplant volume within 1 year. A systematic approach to ECD kidneys based on nephron mass matching and nephron sparing measures may provide optimal utilization with short-term outcomes and renal function comparable to SCD kidneys.

The report of a national conference on the wait list for kidney transplantation.

In March, 2002, over 100 members of the transplant community assembled in Philadelphia for a meeting designed to address problems associated with the growing number of patients seeking kidney transplantation and added to the waiting list each year. The meeting included representatives of nine US organizations with interests in these issues. Participants divided into work groups addressing access to the waiting list, assigning priority on the list, list management, and identifying appropriate candidates for expanded criteria donor kidneys. Each work group outlined problems and potential remedies within each area. This report summarized the issues and recommendations regarding the waiting list for kidney transplantation addressed in the Philadelphia meeting.