Phase 2 Assessment of a New Functional Pain Scale by Comparing It to Traditional Pain Scales.

Background Assessment of pain has always been subjective and is commonly assessed using a numeric pain scale (NPS) or Wong-Baker faces scale. The pain intensity score is not standardized and relies on individuals' past experiences. The disadvantage of using such pain assessment scales and treating the numbers can lead to overdosing on analgesics leading to unwanted side effects. The Robert Packer Hospital/Functional Pain Scale (RPH/FPS) was developed as a tool for the objective assessment of pain and its impact on a patient's function.  Aim The study aimed to validate the RPH/FPS scale against NPS and Wong-Baker faces scale in medical, surgical, and trauma patients. The patients' were also asked to rank the scales as one (1) being the most preferred to three (3) being the least preferred. Design This prospective, observational cohort study compares the two most common pain scales, the NPS and the Wong-Baker Faces, to the RPH/FPS. Methods Spearman correlation was used to test for correlation between the three scales, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare means between the RPH/FPS and NPS. The study participants were also asked to rate their preferences for the scales by rating the most preferred of the three scales as one (1) and the least preferred number three (3).  Results The RPH/FPS had a strong correlation with both the NPS and Wong-Baker Faces scales (RPH/FPS vs. NPS R=0.69, p<0.001: RPH-FPS vs. Wong-Baker Faces R=0.69, P<0.001). As for preferences, the RPH/FPS was ranked first on 36.9% of the surveys followed by NPS on 35.9%, and the Wong-Baker Faces on 22.3%. There were 4.9% of the surveys missing the preference rankings. Conclusion The results validate the RPH/FPS scale against the NPS and Wong-Baker Faces scales. This gives the clinicians a tool for objective assessment of pain and its effect on the recovery process, thereby minimizing the observed disconnect that sometimes happens between the reported pain intensity level and the providers' observation of the patient.

Retraction: Phase 2 Assessment of a New Functional Pain Scale by Comparing It to Traditional Pain Scales.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24522.].

Assessment of Functional Pain Score by Comparing to Traditional Pain Scores.

BACKGROUND: Pain assessments, such as the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) and Wong-Baker FACEs (FACEs), offer methods to quantify pain with simplistic descriptions on a scale of 0-10 or facial expressions. These tools have limitations and deliver insufficient information to the provider developing a pain management plan. A new Functional Pain Scale (FPS) assesses other scopes of pain, including the loss of function in activities of daily living, sleep habits, and communication. Although NPS and FACEs are traditionally used in clinical practice, FPS provides a functional assessment to help patients self-report their pain to their providers.  Aim: Our study attempts to show a comparative data analysis of the FPS to NPS and FACEs. The purpose of our study is not to demonstrate FPS's superiority over NPS and FACEs but to fill the gaps of information necessary to communicate the type of pain a patient has to their provider. Due to its descriptive nature and clear scores, FPS should be implemented within electronic medical records (EMR) to help providers assess patients' pain and evaluate the efficacy of interventions selected based on that pain. DESIGN: A prospective, observational, single-center, cohort study was performed, with simultaneously administered surveys to compare pains scores on a new FPS to the common NPS and FACEs. The target sample was postoperative orthopedic patients above 18 years of age who can read and speak English. Patients were surveyed on all three pain scales: FPS, NPS, and FACEs and were asked to rate their pain perioperatively after their respective orthopedic procedures. METHODS: Spearman correlation method was used to test for correlation between the three pain scales and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare means between FPS and NPS. RESULTS: FPS has a strong correlation with FACEs (r = 0.647, p<0.05) and with NPS (r = 0.634, p<0.05). There is a significant difference in mean scores between FPS and NPS. Conclusion and study implications: The most reliable marker of pain is patient self-reporting. In routine assessment, because pain is one-dimensional, we as providers need to better define the range of 0-10. This can only be done via an algorithm regarding which functions are lost as pain intensities increase. FPS fits those requirements by offering suitable descriptions with each pain score. The implications of the study include a chance to remedy the opioid crisis that plagues healthcare. We need tools that assess and educate patients about their pain level and appropriately convey that information to providers. Furthermore, this study is a chance for innovative tools to be implemented to better change healthcare practice. If FPS gains traction, it can improve pain communication between patients and providers.

Rare pathology in a trauma patient: air embolism following peripheral intravenous access.

A 62-year-old man presented as a trauma alert after a farm tractor accident. He was managed according to ATLS protocol. During initial trauma resuscitation, he developed an iatrogenic air embolus. The patient was treated conservatively by positioning him head down and tilted to the left (Durant's manoeuvre). Repeat CT scan performed 4 hours later showed resolution of the air embolus. He had no sequelae.

Endometriosis of the Vermiform Appendix Presenting as Acute Appendicitis.

Endometriosis is characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Endometriosis of the appendix is rare and its preoperative diagnosis is difficult. We report the case of a postmenopausal woman who presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain concerning for acute appendicitis. Histopathological examination of her appendix revealed endometriosis and her abdominal pain resolved after appendectomy.

A Giant Adrenal Mass in a Super Obese Patient.

Giant pheochromocytomas (Pheo) are rare entities requiring clinical suspicion coupled with strategic diagnostic evaluation to confirm the diagnosis. The majority of cases are discovered incidentally. The diagnosis consists of biochemical evaluation and imaging study to localize the mass. Pathological examination confirms the diagnosis. The female patient in this case report presented with chest pain, palpitation of three weeks duration and was found on evaluation to have an abdominal mass concerning for pheochromocytoma. She was treated with surgical resection. The pheo measured 20.5 x 18 x 10 cm and weighed 2,582 grams. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

Time course of cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory biomarkers and relationship to 6-month neurologic outcome in adult severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: Activation of the inflammatory cascade is a known pathophysiologic process in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with yet non-standardized scientific data regarding relationship to outcome. The understanding of the time course of expression of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker levels following severe TBI is an important step toward using these biomarkers to measure injury severity and/or early response to therapeutic interventions. The objective of the current study is to report the time course and values of a battery of CSF inflammatory biomarkers following severe TBI in our reasonably sized patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our patient cohort consists of 32 consented patients, who met the study's inclusion criteria for data collection from 2000 to 2010. The time course and values of a battery of CSF biomarkers (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-12p70, IL-10, and IL-8) following severe TBI in this patient cohort was characterized. Additionally, the correlation of biomarker concentration with 6-month neurological outcome was assessed. Serial CSF sampling through an external ventricular drain was performed over the first five days following injury. Concentration of a panel of inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-12p70, IL-10, and IL-8) were evaluated using Meso Scale Discovery's Multi-Array technology. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at six months following injury was dichotomized into poor outcome (GOS 1-3) and favorable outcome (GOS 4-5). Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The result shows that CSF concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers had a significant association with 6-month neurological outcome (p-values≤0.05 for each marker), with the favorable outcome group having lower concentrations of these biomarkers on average, in comparison to the poor neurologic outcome group over the first five days after TBI. All inflammatory biomarkers decreased to normal levels by post-trauma day 5, except for IL-6 and IL-8. Upregulation and increased expression of key inflammatory markers following severe TBI were significant predictors of worse 6-month neurologic outcome. Additionally, post-trauma day 5 concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 remained elevated over normal CSF values. CONCLUSION: The study shows that inflammatory biomarkers in CSF are potential biomarkers of injury severity and progression and/or recovery; they could prove beneficial in the future assessment of injury severity and response to therapy after severe TBI.