RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lymphoma, encompassing common non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and less common Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), represents significant hematological malignancies. Advancements in treatment modalities have reshaped survival rates, particularly in NHL. This complexity results in varying outcomes, some requiring extended observation periods and multiple chemotherapy treatments. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to explore and compare the overall survival (OS) of HL and NHL at 1, 3, and 5-year follow-ups among adult lymphoma patients in Qatar during January 2013 - December 2017. Further objectives encompass comparing the most prevalent histological types, clinical and epidemiological traits of HL and NHL, as well as secondary aims of assessing clinical features, treatment, response, disease-free survival, and overall survival. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of consecutive cases was conducted at Qatar's NCCCR between 2013 and 2017. Inclusion criteria involved patients ≥18 years old, of any gender and clinical stage at diagnosis, who received chemotherapy and had known outcomes. Descriptive statistics were applied, and survival analysis utilized Kaplan-Meier curves. STATA version 13.0 facilitated data analysis. RESULTS: Between 2013-2017, 414 individuals in Qatar were diagnosed with lymphoma. The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (IQR 36-95 years; p<0.001) across all patients. Males exhibited a higher likelihood of developing HL and NHL, comprising 74% and 70% of cases respectively, though this difference was statistically insignificant (p=0.45). Among NHL-B subtypes, mature B-cell neoplasms (60%) predominated, while Lymphocyte-rich subtype (49%) was prominent in HL cases. With a median follow-up of 17.3 months, OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 99%, 82%, and 64% respectively for all lymphoma patients. Subtype stratification revealed trends in 3-year follow-up OS (94% versus 82%) for HL and NHL, with 5-year OS of 67% and 60% respectively. HL demonstrated higher OS throughout the study period compared to NHL (p<0.001), though median OS remained unreached. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma emerged as the most prevalent subtype among lymphomas in Qatar. Generally, HL exhibited superior survival rates, at 67% compared to 60% for NHL. Minor deflation in survival rates, particularly for HL, might be attributed to Qatar's immigration patterns.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a major health issues and common type of nutritional deficiency worldwide. For IDA treatment, intravenous (IV) iron is a useful therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness (CE) of intravenous (IV) Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) versus IV Iron Sucrose (IS) in treating IDA. DATA SOURCES: Electronic medical record i.e. Cerner® system. TARGET POPULATION: Adults patients with iron deficiency anaemia. TIME HORIZON: A 12-month period (01/01/2018-31/12/2018). PERSPECTIVE: Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC, a public hospital). INTERVENTION: IV Ferric Carboxymaltose versus IV Iron Sucrose. OUTCOME MEASURES: With regard to responses to treatment i.e., efficacy of treatment with FCM & IS in IDA patients, hemoglobin (Hgb), ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were the primary outcomes. Additionally, the researchers also collected levels of iron, platelet, white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV). The costs i.e. resources consumed (obtained from NCCCR-HMC) and the CE of FCM versus IS were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: There was a significant improvement in Hgb, RBC and MCH levels in the IS group than the FCM group. The overall cost of IS therapy was significantly higher than FCM. The medication cost for FCM was approximately 6.5 times higher than IS, nonetheless, it is cheaper in terms of bed cost and nursing cost. The cost effectiveness (CE) ratio illustrated that FCM and IS were significantly different in terms of Hgb, ferritin and MCH levels. Further, Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) indicated that further justifications and decisions need to be made for FCM when using Hgb, iron, TSAT, MCH and MCV levels as surrogate outcomes. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Not applicable. LIMITATIONS: The study did not consider the clinical or humanistic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The higher cost of FCM versus IS can be offset by savings in healthcare personnel time and bed space. ICER indicated that further justifications and decisions need to be made for FCM when using Hgb, iron, TSAT, MCH and MCV levels as surrogate outcomes.
