Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.

Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (C+G-CSF) is one of the most widely used stem cell (SC) mobilization regimens for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Plerixafor plus G-CSF (P+G-CSF) has demonstrated superior SC mobilization efficacy when compared with G-CSF alone and has been shown to rescue patients who fail mobilization with G-CSF or C+G-CSF. Despite the proven efficacy of P+G-CSF in upfront SC mobilization, its use has been limited, mostly due to concerns of high price of the drug. However, a comprehensive comparison of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of SC mobilization using C+G-CSF versus P+G-CSF is not available. In this study, we compared 111 patients receiving C+G-CSF to 112 patients receiving P+G-CSF. The use of P+G-CSF was associated with a higher success rate of SC collection defined as ⩾5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (94 versus 83%, P=0.013) and less toxicities. Thirteen patients in the C+G-CSF arm were hospitalized owing to complications while none in the P+G-CSF group. C+G-CSF was associated with higher financial burden as assessed using institutional-specific costs and charges (P<0.001) as well as using Medicare reimbursement rates (P=0.27). Higher rate of hospitalization, increased need for salvage mobilization, and increased G-CSF use account for these differences.

Safety of voriconazole and sirolimus coadministration after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.

Antifungal prophylaxis with azoles is considered standard in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). Although sirolimus is being used increasingly for the prevention of GVHD, it is a substrate of CYP3A4, which is inhibited by voriconazole, and concurrent administration can lead to significantly increased exposure to sirolimus. We identified 67 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HSCT with sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose MTX and received concomitant voriconazole prophylaxis from April 2008 to June 2011. All patients underwent a non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioned allo-HSCT. Patients received sirolimus and voriconazole concurrently for a median of 113 days. The median daily dose reduction of sirolimus at the start of coadministration was 90%. The median serum sirolimus trough levels before and at steady state of coadministration were 5.8 ng/mL (range: 0-47.6) and 6.1 ng/mL (range: 1-14.2) (P=0.45), respectively. One patient with an average sirolimus level of 6 ng/mL developed sirolimus-related thrombotic microangiopathy that resolved after sirolimus discontinuation. No sinusoidal obstructive syndrome was reported. Seventeen patients (25%) prematurely discontinued voriconazole because of the adverse events. Only two patients (3%) presented with possible invasive fungal infections at day 100. We demonstrate that sirolimus and voriconazole coadministration with an empiric 90% sirolimus dose reduction and close monitoring of sirolimus trough levels is safe and well tolerated.