Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Genet Couns ; 18(6): 606-17, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19798553

RESUMO

Patients and clinicians alike view anonymous testing as a potential way to avoid perceived risks of genetic testing such as insurance and employment discrimination and the potential loss of privacy. To assess their experience with and attitudes towards anonymous testing for BRCA1/2, genetic counselors were invited to complete an internet-based survey via the NSGC Familial Cancer Risk Counseling Special Interest Group (FCRC-SIG) listerv. A majority of the 115 respondents (70%) had received requests from patients for anonymous BRCA1/2 testing at some point in their careers and 43% complied with this request. Most counselors, however, encountered such requests infrequently, 1-5 times per year. Although genetic counselors do not generally encourage anonymous testing and over a third of respondents feel it should never be offered, a substantial subset support its use under specific circumstances. In general, a strong consensus exists among counselors that anonymous testing should not be offered routinely. In light of the current legislative landscape, it is of note that a substantial proportion of respondents (42.7%) cited the threat of life insurance discrimination as a reason for pursuing AT, and fewer cited health insurance (30.0%) or employment discrimination (29.1%) as justifications. Since there exists no federal legislative protections against discrimination by life insurance companies, it makes sense that genetic counselors were more responsive to this issue as opposed to the threat of discrimination in health insurance and employment.


Assuntos
Testes Anônimos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Aconselhamento Genético , Padrões de Prática Médica , Discriminação Psicológica , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Seguro de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Hepatology ; 50(2): 575-84, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19582816

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Transforming growth factor-beta / bone morphogenetic protein (TGFbeta/BMP) signaling has a gradient of effects on cell fate choice in the fetal mouse liver. The molecular mechanism to understand why adjacent cells develop into bile ducts or grow actively as hepatocytes in the ubiquitous presence of both TGFbeta ligands and receptors has been unknown. We hypothesized that microRNAs (miRNAs) might play a role in cell fate decisions in the liver. miRNA profiling during late fetal development in the mouse identified miR-23b cluster miRNAs comprising miR-23b, miR-27b, and miR-24-1 and miR-10a, miR-26a, and miR-30a as up-regulated. In situ hybridization of fetal liver at embryonic day 17.5 of gestation revealed miR-23b cluster expression only in fetal hepatocytes. A complementary (c)DNA microarray approach was used to identify genes with a reciprocal expression pattern to that of miR-23b cluster miRNAs. This approach identified Smads (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog), the key TGFbeta signaling molecules, as putative miR-23b cluster targets. Bioinformatic analysis identified multiple candidate target sites in the 3' UTRs (untranslated regions) of Smads 3, 4, and 5. Dual luciferase reporter assays confirmed down-regulation of constructs containing Smad 3, 4, or 5, 3' UTRs by a mixture of miR-23b cluster mimics. Knockdown of miR-23b miRNAs during hepatocytic differentiation of a fetal liver stem cell line, HBC-3, promoted expression of bile duct genes, in addition to Smads, in these cells. In contrast, ectopic expression of miR-23b mimics during bile duct differentiation of HBC-3 cells blocked the process. CONCLUSION: Our data provide a model in which miR-23b miRNAs repress bile duct gene expression in fetal hepatocytes while promoting their growth by down-regulating Smads and consequently TGFbeta signaling. Concomitantly, low levels of the miR-23b miRNAs are needed in cholangiocytes to allow TGFbeta signaling and bile duct formation.


Assuntos
Diferenciação Celular , Hepatócitos/metabolismo , Fígado/metabolismo , MicroRNAs/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Animais , Ductos Biliares/citologia , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Hepatócitos/citologia , Fígado/citologia , Fígado/embriologia , Camundongos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , RNA Interferente Pequeno/metabolismo , Proteínas Smad/metabolismo
3.
Mech Dev ; 123(2): 177-94, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16412614

RESUMO

Bile duct morphogenesis involves sequential induction of biliary specific gene expression, bilayer generation, cell proliferation, remodeling and apoptosis. HBC-3 cells are a model system to study differentiation of hepatoblasts along the hepatocytic or bile ductular lineage in vitro and in vivo. We used microarray to define molecular pathways during ductular differentiation in response to Matrigel. The temporal pattern of expression of marker genes induced was similar to that observed during bile duct formation in vivo. Notch, HNF1beta, Polycystic kidney disease 2, Bicaudal C 1 and beta-catenin were up regulated during the time course. Functional clustering analysis revealed significant up regulation of clusters of genes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling, ion transport, vacuoles, lytic vacuoles, pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes, transcription factors and negative regulators of the cell proliferation, while genes involved in the cell cycle were significantly down regulated. Notch signaling pathway was activated by treatment with Matrigel. In addition, TGFbeta/BMP signaling pathway members including the type I TGFbeta receptor and Smads 3, 4 and 5 were significantly up regulated, as were several TGFbeta/BMP responsive genes including Hey 1, a regulator of Notch pathway signaling. SMADS 3, 4 and 5 were present in the nuclear fraction of HBC-3 cells during ductular differentiation in vitro, but not during hepatocyte differentiation. SMAD 5 was preferentially expressed in hepatoblasts undergoing bile duct morphogenesis in the fetal liver, while the TGFbeta/BMP signaling antagonist chordin, was expressed throughout the liver suggesting a mechanism by which TGFbeta/BMP signaling is limited to hepatoblasts that contact portal mesenchyme in vivo.


Assuntos
Ductos Biliares/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Hepatócitos/citologia , Morfogênese/genética , Animais , Ductos Biliares/citologia , Ductos Biliares/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/análise , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 1 , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/genética , Diferenciação Celular , Feto/citologia , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Fator 1-beta Nuclear de Hepatócito/metabolismo , Hepatócitos/metabolismo , Metaloendopeptidases/genética , Camundongos , Receptores Notch/genética , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento Transformadores beta/genética , Transdução de Sinais , Proteínas Smad Reguladas por Receptor/genética , Transcrição Gênica , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/genética , Regulação para Cima
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...