Factors Associated With Change in S3-NIV Score Over Time in People With Chronic Respiratory Failure Treated With Long-Term Home Noninvasive Ventilation.

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring changes in symptoms over time during long-term nocturnal home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) using patient-reported outcome measures is crucial. This study aimed to identify factors associated with changes in the S3-NIV total score, its two domains ("respiratory symptoms" and "sleep and NIV-related side effects") and individual item responses. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal data analysis of a cohort of adults with chronic respiratory failure treated with NIV. Data were obtained from a French homecare provider. Multivariate linear and multinomial ordinal mixed effect models were used to identify factors associated with changes in S3-NIV scores over time. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2 years for 2135 participants. Each participant completed a median of five S3-NIV questionnaires; totaling 11,359 analyzed questionnaires. Type of respiratory condition, sex, age and time since NIV initiation were associated with change in S3-NIV score over time. NIV adherence was not associated with total S3-NIV score but high adherence was associated with more severe respiratory symptoms and an improvement in sleep and NIV-related side effects during the follow-up. Intensity of pressure support was associated with a lower total S3-NIV score and more side effects. Face masks and supplemental oxygen were associated with a lower S3-NIV total score. CONCLUSION: Changes in S3-NIV scores over time are associated with the individual's characteristics and NIV settings. Analysis of the two domains and individual items of the S3-NIV could increase understanding of the difficulties experienced by people on NIV.

Dyspnoea in acutely ill mechanically ventilated adult patients: an ERS/ESICM statement.

This statement outlines a review of the literature and current practice concerning the prevalence, clinical significance, diagnosis and management of dyspnoea in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients. It covers the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, short- and middle-term impact, detection and quantification, and prevention and treatment of dyspnoea. It represents a collaboration of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Dyspnoea ranks among the most distressing experiences that human beings can endure. Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) report dyspnoea, with an average intensity of 45 mm on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 mm. Although it shares many similarities with pain, dyspnoea can be far worse than pain in that it summons a primal fear response. As such, it merits universal and specific consideration. Dyspnoea must be identified, prevented and relieved in every patient. In the ICU, mechanically ventilated patients are at high risk of experiencing breathing difficulties because of their physiological status and, in some instances, because of mechanical ventilation itself. At the same time, mechanically ventilated patients have barriers to signalling their distress. Addressing this major clinical challenge mandates teaching and training, and involves ICU caregivers and patients. This is even more important because, as opposed to pain which has become a universal healthcare concern, very little attention has been paid to the identification and management of respiratory suffering in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Dyspnoea in acutely ill mechanically ventilated adult patients: an ERS/ESICM statement.

This statement outlines a review of the literature and current practice concerning the prevalence, clinical significance, diagnosis and management of dyspnoea in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients. It covers the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, short- and middle-term impact, detection and quantification, and prevention and treatment of dyspnoea. It represents a collaboration of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Dyspnoea ranks among the most distressing experiences that human beings can endure. Approximately 40% of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) report dyspnoea, with an average intensity of 45 mm on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 mm. Although it shares many similarities with pain, dyspnoea can be far worse than pain in that it summons a primal fear response. As such, it merits universal and specific consideration. Dyspnoea must be identified, prevented and relieved in every patient. In the ICU, mechanically ventilated patients are at high risk of experiencing breathing difficulties because of their physiological status and, in some instances, because of mechanical ventilation itself. At the same time, mechanically ventilated patients have barriers to signalling their distress. Addressing this major clinical challenge mandates teaching and training, and involves ICU caregivers and patients. This is even more important because, as opposed to pain which has become a universal healthcare concern, very little attention has been paid to the identification and management of respiratory suffering in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.