Urinary bladder scanning after day-case arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia: comparison between lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Micturition problems after spinal anaesthesia may delay hospital discharge. The use of lidocaine has raised concerns because of the occurrence of transient neurological symptoms (TNS). This randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the newer local anaesthetics with lidocaine regarding block characteristics, micturition problems, and discharge times in day-case spinals for arthroscopy. METHODS: Ninety patients received either isobaric lidocaine 60 mg, ropivacaine 15 mg, or levobupivacaine 10 mg intrathecally. Urinary bladder volumes were measured by ultrasound imaging at regular time intervals until a post-voiding residual volume (PVRV) less than 100 ml was obtained. Micturition problems were classified in five groups ranging from no problems to those requiring catheterization. RESULTS: Times to regain a Bromage-1 and -0 motor block were similar in the three groups but sensory block regression to L2 occurred at 145 (30) min in the lidocaine group, 25-30 min (P<0.05) faster than the other groups. Lidocaine allowed voiding after 245 (65) min and hospital discharge 265 (70) min after spinal injection, 40 min faster than in the two other groups. The incidence or degree of micturition problems were not different between after discharge, three patients (10%) receiving lidocaine complained of symptoms compatible with TNS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that the three local anaesthetics behave similar regarding quality of anaesthesia and motor block but voiding and discharge occurred significantly earlier with lidocaine although the 40 min difference was not impressive considering a spinal discharge time interval of 4-5 h.

Intrathecal labor analgesia with bupivacaine and sufentanil: the effect of adding 2.25 microg epinephrine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epinephrine, 25 microg and 200 microg, has been found to prolong the duration of intrathecal labor analgesia when added to an opioid. In our hospital we use the standard epidural mixture, prepared by the pharmacist, containing epinephrine 1:800,000; i.e., 1.25 microg/mL for both spinal and epidural labor analgesia. We wanted to evaluate whether such a low dose, depending on its effect on duration or quality of analgesia, should be maintained or deleted in future mixtures. METHODS: Forty-five term parturients were randomly assigned to receive 1.8 mL intrathecally of a mixture containing bupivacaine 0.125% and sufentanil 0.75 microg/mL with or without epinephrine 1.25 microg/mL. The quality and duration of analgesia, side effects, and obstetric/neonatal outcome were compared. RESULTS: For both combinations, the onset until the first painless contraction was between 5 and 6 minutes. Most patients were pain free during the second uterine contraction. The duration of complete analgesia was 93.2 +/- 24.2 minutes in the epinephrine group and 79.3 +/- 18.1 minutes for patients not receiving epinephrine (P = .014). The quality of the block, bupivacaine consumption, side effects, and obstetric/neonatal outcome were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that epinephrine in a dose as low as 2.25 microg significantly prolonged the duration of intrathecal analgesia of bupivacaine-sufentanil by 15 minutes. No other differences were noticed. Diluting the commercially available bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000 may avoid the need of freshly prepared epinephrine solutions.

Levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil and epinephrine for intrathecal labor analgesia: a comparison with racemic bupivacaine.

UNLABELLED: We performed a randomized, double-blinded study to compare levobupivacaine with racemic bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Eighty term parturients received either levobupivacaine 0.125% or racemic bupivacaine 0.125%, to which was added sufentanil 0.75 microg/mL and epinephrine 1.25 microg/mL. As part of a combined spinal-epidural procedure, 2 mL of this mixture was initially injected intrathecally, and the same solutions were subsequently administered epidurally. For both combinations, onset until the first painless contraction was 4 to 5 min. Most patients were pain free during the second contraction. The duration of initial spinal analgesia was 93.5 +/- 20 min and 94.7 +/- 31 min for levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine, respectively. The duration of analgesia for the first epidural top-up dose was also similar in the two groups. Total local anesthetic requirements during labor were not different. The only major difference observed was the absence of motor impairment in levobupivacaine-treated parturients as compared with the Racemic Bupivacaine group, in which the incidence of a Bromage-1 motor block was 34%. Other side effects and obstetric or neonatal outcomes were not different between groups. Intrathecal levobupivacaine has a similar clinical profile as racemic bupivacaine, but at equal doses it produced less motor block. IMPLICATIONS: When used intrathecally and epidurally for labor analgesia, levobupivacaine had the same clinical profile as racemic bupivacaine, but at equal doses it produced less motor block.

Epidural PCA with bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram and epinephrine 1/800.000 for labor analgesia: is a background infusion beneficial?

Eighty term parturients requesting epidural analgesia for labor pain treatment were randomly assigned to receive bupivacaine 0.125%, sufentanil 0.75 microgram/ml and epinephrine 1/800.000 by PCA modality with or without a basal rate of 3 ml/hr. A loading of 10 ml using the same mixture was administered while the PCA-demand dose consisted of 3 ml (lock out time 12 minutes). Total consumption, duration of labor, pain scores during the first and second stage of labor, maternal satisfaction and side-effects did not differ among both groups. Only when short labours were considered total consumption was lower in those treated with the demand modality only but they tended to experience more pain during the second stage. We conclude that for shortlasting labors, a low dose epidural PCA regimen results in a dose-sparing effect when compared to PCEA combined with a background infuson. For longer-lasting labors no differences between the two modalities could be observed.

Prevention of hypotension by a single 5-mg dose of ephedrine during small-dose spinal anesthesia in prehydrated cesarean delivery patients.

UNLABELLED: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia, 50 parturients undergoing cesarean delivery received either ephedrine 5 mg or saline IV in a double-blinded fashion immediately after the induction of spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was performed with hyperbaric bupivacaine 6.6 mg combined with sufentanil 3.3 microg as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique. All patients received 1000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution and 500 mL of hydroxyethylstarch 6% before the spinal injection. Additional ephedrine boluses (5 mg) were administered IV when the systolic blood pressure or heart rate decreased by more than 30% from baseline values, when systolic blood pressure became <100 mm Hg, or when patients complained of nausea or feeling faint. The height of the block was equal in the groups; however, more patients in the placebo group were found to develop hypotension (58% vs 25%, P < 0. 05). Only 2 (8%) patients in the ephedrine group developed hypotension with systolic blood pressure values <90 mm Hg, whereas 10 patients (42%) in the saline group experienced hypotension of this severity (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a higher incidence of nausea in the placebo-treated patients. The total amount of ephedrine administered did not differ between groups. These findings suggest that the incidence and severity of hypotension are significantly reduced by the IV administration of a prophylactic dose of 5 mg ephedrine in patients receiving small-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. IMPLICATIONS: Ephedrine is the drug most often used to correct hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in healthy patients. A single IV dose of 5 mg decreases the occurrence and limits the severity of hypotension in prehydrated subjects receiving a small-dose spinal local anesthetic-opioid combination.

Seven-year review of requests for epidural blood patches for headache after dural puncture: referral patterns and the effectiveness of blood patches.

A review was undertaken of all 190 patients who were referred over 7 years, from 1991 to 1997 inclusive, for an epidural blood patch as a treatment for headache after dural puncture. The patterns of referral and symptoms, the distributions of age and gender and the effectiveness of the blood patch were examined. Most of the referrals (n = 153) were after deliberate diagnostic dural puncture in neurology and neuroradiology, with a minority (n = 28) used for anaesthesia and obstetrics, which were mostly inadvertent. Another nine cases were related to placement of an intrathecal catheter. The numbers of referrals per year reached a maximum in 1995 before falling again, a curious inverse relation to the number of invasive neuro-radiological diagnostic procedures. Most of the patients were between 30 and 50-years-old, with 25 younger than 30 and 14 older than 60. Women accounted for 70% of the referrals for headache, although the gender ratio amongst patients subjected to at risk procedures appeared closer to 50:50. Neckache accompanied the headache in 85% of cases, auditory problems were volunteered by three patients and one patient had diplopia for 6 weeks. Of the 190 patients who were referred, 186 received at least one patch, the symptoms in the remaining four being too mild or atypical to warrant blood patch treatment. This provided initial relief in all but two patients, one of whom received a further epidural blood patch with no effect. There was sustained relief of symptoms in 136 and a partial relapse in 38 patients, which resolved without needing any further blood patch. A second patch was provided for seven patients and a third for three patients, of whom two were cured. Of the patients who needed more than one blood patch, nine were after inadvertent dural puncture with a Tuohy needle and, of these patients, six were in labour. A total of 200 patches were provided in all for the 186 patients and all but three patients had a satisfactory outcome. Epidural blood patches are effective in treating headache after dural puncture, but less successful than is commonly believed, especially after inadvertent dural taps. A relapse after treatment does not always require a second patch. Specialities other than anaesthesia seemed reluctant to accept the benefits in both cost and comfort of using needles of improved design for dural puncture.

Posterior epidural space depth: safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques.

We have compared skin to epidural space distance (SED) and tip to tip distance (TTD), a measure of posterior epidural space depth (PESD), in 40 patients with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle after identification of the epidural space using the hanging drop (HD) or loss of resistance (LOR) to air technique. After the LOR technique, TTD was found to be 2 mm greater than that after the HD technique, whereas SED was the same. We conclude that identification of the epidural space can be performed successfully with both techniques, but with a diminished risk of dural damage after LOR compared with the HD technique.

Small-dose hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

UNLABELLED: In a double-blind, randomized trial, 98 parturients undergoing cesarean section received either hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine 6.6 mg combined with sufentanil 3.3 microg as part of a combined spinal-epidural procedure. To prevent hypotension, 1000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution, 500 mL of hydroxyethyl starch 6%, and ephedrine 5 mg were administered i.v. The height of the block was equal in both groups, but more patients in the plain group had blocks that were either too high or too low (P < 0.01). The number of patients requiring epidural supplementation was equal in both groups. Strict criteria were used to treat hypotension. The overall incidence of systolic blood pressure (<90 mm Hg) was 13%, whereas it was more pronounced in the plain group (21% vs 6% in the hyperbaric group, P < 0.05), which required more ephedrine (P < 0.05) and in which a greater incidence of nausea was noticed (P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of a small dose of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with sufentanil plus our described preloading regimen resulted in a lower incidence of hypotension. Further, we conclude that the use of hyperbaric bupivacaine in this manner provides a more reliable block and a lower incidence of hypotension than plain bupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: A small dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with sufentanil used intrathecally during cesarean section offered a more reliable cephalad spread of the spinal block than the glucose-free combination, which was reflected in a lower incidence of hypotension and nausea.

Postoperative intrathecal patient-controlled analgesia with bupivacaine, sufentanil or a mixture of both.

In a randomised double-blind study, 45 patients, scheduled for major orthopaedic surgery under continuous spinal anaesthesia, received for relief of postoperative pain patient-controlled analgesia with either sufentanil 2 micrograms.ml-1, bupivacaine 0.0625% or a mixture of both by the intrathecal route. The mean (SD) consumption of sufentanil and bupivacaine during the first 12 h was 65.5 (27.1) micrograms and 18.2 (4.8) mg, respectively. Combining bupivacaine and sufentanil reduced the consumption of both to approximately 40% as compared to the administration of each component separately. Pain relief was very good in all subjects, although this was obtained faster with the combined regimen. Moreover, more patients in this group remained completely painfree during the entire observation period (p < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension was low and not significantly different when the plain bupivacaine group was compared with the two other groups. Nausea and vomiting were significantly more frequently observed in both groups treated with sufentanil. Motor block was not a major problem and was noticed during the first 2 h of treatment only. Tachyphylaxis did not occur. It was concluded that the groups receiving plain bupivacaine and sufentanil alone experienced pain relief of good quality. The use of a mixture, however, accelerated the onset of analgesia, improved the analgesic quality and reduced the doses for both components by 60% but at the expense of a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Potentiation of sufentanil by clonidine in PCEA with or without basal infusion.

Sufentanil or a sufentanil-clonidine combination was evaluated to determine whether the basal rate in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) might affect the daily consumption, quality of analgesia or incidence of side effects. Following Caesarean section delivery, 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the four following PCA regimens (15 patients per group) for the relief of post-operative pain by the epidural route: sufentanil 2 micrograms mL-1 in 0.9% NaCl, demand dose 5 micrograms i.e. 2.5 mL, (group S+ with, group S without an infusion at 2.5 mL hr-1) or sufentanil 2 micrograms mL-1 + clonidine 3 micrograms mL-1, demand dose 5 micrograms sufentanil + 7.5 micrograms clonidine i.e. 2.5 mL (group SC+ with and SC without an infusion of 2.5 ml hr-1). The other PCA settings (Bard I PCA pump) were a lock out of interval of 10 min and a 1 h limit of 20 micrograms sufentanil and 30 micrograms clonidine i.e. 10 mL. The parameters measured were the analgesic drug consumption and number of dose demands during the first 24 h, pain scores at 6 h intervals, side effects and quality of sleep. The concurrent infusion increased the dose requirements regardless of the content of the syringe. Consumption of sufentanil was the highest in those patients receiving the plain solution with a basal infusion. Clonidine addition reduced the dose requirements but only significantly in those receiving the background infusion. Patients treated with the mixture tended to reach lower pain scores than those receiving sufentanil only without basal rate. Patients receiving the mixture with basal rate requested significantly fewer additional demands compared with the three other groups, but this did not influence the quality of sleep. Since side effects were more frequently registered in the patients in this group, it was concluded that the optimum regimen was the sufentanil-clonidine combination but with deletion of the basal rate.

Spinal analgesia during labor with low-dose bupivacaine, sufentanil, and epinephrine. A comparison with epidural analgesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) injection of a bupiv-acaine-sufentanil-epinephrine mixture during labor as compared with epidural analgesia alone. METHODS: In a randomized trial, 63 parturients presenting for vaginal delivery received either epidural analgesia (10 mL) with 12.5 mg bupivacaine plus 10 micrograms sufentanil and 12.5 micrograms epinephrine or CSE analgesia with a single subarachnoid injection of 1 mg bupivacaine plus 5 micrograms sufentanil and 25 micrograms epinephrine (total volume, 2.5 mL). For this purpose a 29-gauge BD-Quincke spinal needle was used. All subsequent top-ups consisted of 10 mL of the mixture, as used for the patients who received epidural analgesia only. RESULTS: Thirteen patients delivered without requesting a second injection. The time required to obtain satisfactory analgesia (visual analog score < or = 2.5 and/or > 50% improvement) was significantly shorter for those who received the subarachnoid mixture than for the epidural analgesia group (4.0 +/- 0.4 vs 10.4 +/- 0.5 minutes, respectively, P < .001). The duration of analgesia was longer for the CSE group (137.4 +/- 11.5 vs 106.4 +/- 11.8 minutes, P < .05), with more patients being pain-free for longer than 150 minutes (40 vs 8%, P < .05). Less bupivacaine was consumed in the group receiving the subarachnoid mixture (21.6 +/- 2.0 vs 30.7 +/- 2.1 mg, P < .01). Pruritus was more common following subarachnoid than following epidural injection of sufentanil (53.1 vs 25.8%, P < .05). Other side effects related to the injected drugs, such as motor impairment, hypotension, or nausea or vomiting, were not observed. Although all blocks were uneventful, moderate headache compatible with postdural puncture headache occurred in two patients of the CSE group, which necessitated a blood patch after 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The CSE mixture induced long-lasting analgesia, with fast onset and without motor block or hypotension. Pruritus and headache were the major drawbacks of this technique.

Hydroxyethylstarch compared with modified gelatin as volume preload before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

We studied 90 patients undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia who received lactated Ringer's solution 1000 ml with up to 1000 ml of modified gelatin, lactated Ringer's solution 1000 ml with up to 1000 ml of 6% hydroxyethylstarch or only up to 1000 ml of 6% hydroxyethylstarch. Lumbar puncture was performed as soon as 500 ml of the colloid were infused. The incidence of hypotension, number of patients requiring a vasopressor and doses of ephedrine required to restore arterial pressure were significantly lower in favour of those receiving the crystalloid-hydroxyethylstarch combination. In both groups receiving the 2000 ml preload, packed cell volume (PCV) values decreased by more than 20%, which may be of concern in patients already presenting with mild anaemia. In patients who received the colloid without the crystalloid, PCV values decreased by 14% but the risk of severe hypotension was comparable with the crystalloid-gelatin combination.

Epidural sufentanil for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with or without background infusion: a double-blind comparison.

To evaluate the usefulness of a concurrent infusion in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), 40 patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under a combined spinal-epidural technique were assigned randomly in a double-blind fashion to receive sufentanil by PCEA with a concomitant infusion of either sufentanil or saline. The sufentanil 24-h consumption was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in those patients receiving the opioid-containing infusion (212.7 +/- 9.5 vs 128.4 +/- 10.8 micrograms, SEM). The number of additional demands and the quality of sleep did not differ between the two groups. The degree of sedation was significantly less pronounced in patients treated with incremental sufentanil doses only. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest were identical in both groups except at 6 h (2.5 +/- 0.4 vs 3.7 +/- 0.3, in favor of the patients treated with the sufentanil background infusion). We conclude that, except for a lower pain score during the initial hours, a background infusion in PCEA with sufentanil does not offer major advantages in terms of sleep quality or sufentanil consumption. Side effects may be more pronounced owing to increased drug administration.

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with sufentanil following caesarean section: the effect of adrenaline and clonidine admixture.

Sixty patients, scheduled for Caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive by the epidural route in a double-blind fashion one of the following patient-controlled analgesia mixtures for the relief of postoperative pain: sufentanil 2 micrograms.ml-1 in 0.9% sodium chloride, sufentanil 2 micrograms.ml-1 + adrenaline 2.5 micrograms.ml-1, or sufentanil 2 micrograms.ml-1 + clonidine 3 micrograms.ml-1. Patient-controlled analgesia settings were a basal infusion rate of 2.5 ml.h-1, an incremental dose of 2.5 ml, a lockout interval of 10 min and a 1-h limit of 10 ml. Whereas patient demographics and pain scores between the groups were not different, the 24-h consumption of sufentanil was significantly lower in the groups receiving a combination (167.5 SD 45 and 139.1 SD 31.9 micrograms for the adrenaline and clonidine groups respectively) as compared to the plain sufentanil regimen (208.2 SD 38.9 micrograms). Although sufentanil requirements were the lowest in the clonidine admixture group, there were no differences with regard to sedation as compared to the plain sufentanil group. The quality of sleep appeared to be significantly better in the sufentanil/adrenaline group despite a significantly lower degree of sedation and higher incidence of pruritus. Treatment of pruritus with naloxone did not seem to influence the quality of analgesia.

Pancreatitis pain treatment: an overview.

Pain associated with chronic pancreatitis in particular is one of the most difficult and challenging syndromes that are presented to pain centers. Narcotic addiction is a common feature in this population. In this contribution an overview will be provided of the most pain treatment modalities based upon recent developments in the field of physiopathology, surgery, medical imaging and locoregional anesthetic techniques. Based upon personal experience it becomes progressively more clear that the most efficient alternative is not offered via neurolysis of the coeliac plexus. A shortlasting cure of 7-10 days with local anesthetics, injected via a coeliac plexus- or interpleural catheter may offer comparable but better reproducible durations of analgesia. Addition of corticosteroids during celiac plexus anesthesia may have additional benefits. Despite the progress in the field of internal medicine and surgery, a permanent solution is still far away for these patients.