Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Environ Qual ; 47(3): 395-409, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29864188

RESUMO

Previous reviews have quantified factors affecting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Asian rice ( L.) systems, but not from rice systems typical for the United States, which often vary considerably particularly in practices (i.e., water and carbon management) that affect emissions. Using meta-analytic and regression approaches, existing data from the United States were examined to quantify GHG emissions and major practices affecting emissions. Due to different production practices, major rice production regions were defined as the mid-South (Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Missouri) and California, with emissions being evaluated separately. Average growing season CH emissions for the mid-South and California were 194 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 129-260) and 218 kg CH ha season (95% CI = 153-284), respectively. Growing season NO emissions were similar between regions (0.14 kg NO ha season). Ratoon cropping (allowing an additional harvestable crop to grow from stubble after the initial harvest), common along the Gulf Coast of the mid-South, had average CH emissions of 540 kg CH ha season (95% CI = 465-614). Water and residue management practices such as alternate wetting and drying, and stand establishment method (water vs. dry seeding), and the amount of residue from the previous crop had the largest effect on growing season CH emissions. However, soil texture, sulfate additions, and cultivar selection also affected growing season CH emissions. This analysis can be used for the development of tools to estimate and mitigate GHG emissions from US rice systems and other similarly mechanized systems in temperate regions.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Gases de Efeito Estufa/análise , Oryza , Arkansas , California , Efeito Estufa , Metano , Mississippi , Texas
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 613-614: 81-87, 2018 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28910718

RESUMO

Use of furrow irrigation in row crop production is a common practice through much of the Midsouth US and yet, nutrients can be transported off-site through surface runoff. A field study with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum, L.) was conducted to understand the impact of furrow tillage practices and nitrogen (N) fertilizer placement on characteristics of runoff water quality during the growing season. The experiment was designed as a randomized complete block design with conventional (CT) and conservation furrow tillage (FT) in combination with either urea (URN) broadcast or 32% urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) injected, each applied at 101kgNha-1. Concentrations of ammonium (NH4-N), nitrate (NO3-N), nitrite (NO2-N), and dissolved phosphorus (P) in irrigation runoff water and lint yields were measured in all treatments. The intensity and chemical form of nutrient losses were primarily controlled by water runoff volume and agronomic practice. Across tillage and fertilizer N treatments, median N concentrations in the runoff were <0.3mgNL-1, with NO3-N being relatively the highest among N forms. Concentrations of runoff dissolved P were <0.05mgPL-1 and were affected by volume of runoff water. Water pH, specific electrical conductivity, alkalinity and hardness were within levels that common to local irrigation water and less likely to impair pollution in waterways. Lint yields averaged 1111kgha-1 and were higher (P-value=0.03) in FT compared to CT treatments. Runoff volumes across irrigation events were greater (P-value=0.02) in CT than FT treatments, which increased NO3-N mass loads in CT treatments (394gNO3-Nha-1season-1). Nitrate-N concentrations in CT treatments were still low and pose little threat to N contaminations in waterways. The findings support the adoption of conservation practices for furrow tillage and N fertilizer placement that can reduce nutrient runoff losses in furrow irrigation systems.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA