Treatment Strategies for Children With Relapsed Pancreatoblastoma: A Literature Review.

Pancreatoblastoma (PB) is a tumor typically seen in childhood. Despite its rarity, there are some internationally agreed recommendations for its first-line treatment, but very little is known about the management of relapse. We reviewed the literature on the treatment and outcome of children with progressing/recurrent PB, and the role of high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) or liver transplantation in difficult cases. A first analysis concerned 15 patients: liver metastases were the most frequent cause of first-line treatment failure. Eight patients underwent surgery, only 3 were irradiated. Various second-line chemotherapy regimens were adopted, with evidence of response in 8 children. The most often-used combinations included etoposide, cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide, and cisplatin/carboplatin. Overall, 7 patients are alive with a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 3 to 88 mo). In a separate analysis, considering patients in first-line or second-line treatment, we found 5 of 6 patients alive after HD-CT and 3 of 3 after liver transplantation. Our review shows that the outcome for patients with recurrent PB is not always dismal, especially when surgery is possible. Different chemotherapy combinations can be used, and HD-CT or liver transplantation may be considered in selected cases.

Is surveillance imaging in pediatric patients treated for localized rhabdomyosarcoma useful? The European experience.

BACKGROUND: After the completion of therapy, patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are subjected to intensive radiological tumor surveillance. However, the clinical benefit of this surveillance is unclear. This study retrospectively analyzed the value of off-therapy surveillance by comparing the survival of patients in whom relapse was detected by routine imaging (the imaging group) and patients in whom relapse was first suspected by symptoms (the symptom group). METHODS: This study included patients with relapsed RMS after the completion of therapy for localized RMS who were treated in large pediatric oncology hospitals in France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and the Netherlands and who were enrolled in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 95 (1995-2004) study, the Italian Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee Rhabdomyosarcoma 96 (1996-2004) study, or the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group Rhabdomyosarcoma 2005 (2005-2013) study. The survival times after relapse were compared with a log-rank test between patients in the imaging group and patients in the symptom group. RESULTS: In total, 199 patients with relapsed RMS were included: 78 patients (39.2%) in the imaging group and 121 patients (60.8%) in the symptom group. The median follow-up time after relapse was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 3.9-11.5 years) for survivors (n = 86); the 3-year postrelapse survival rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-61%) for the imaging group and 46% (95% CI, 37%-55%) for the symptom group (P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Although systematic routine imaging is the standard of care after RMS therapy, the majority of relapses were detected as a result of clinical symptoms. This study found no survival advantage for patients whose relapse was detected before the emergence of clinical symptoms. These results show that the value of off-therapy surveillance is controversial, particularly because repeated imaging may also entail potential harm.