Prescription Patterns for Bipolar Disorder in Asian Countries:Findings from Research on Asian Prescription Pattern-Bipolar Disorder

Objective@#Pharmacotherapy including mood stabilizers and antipsychotics are frequently used in bipolar disorder (BD); however, the lack of consensus regarding the definition of polypharmacy hinders conducting comparative studies across different settings and countries. Research on Asian Prescription Pattern (REAP) is the largest and the longest lasting international collaborative research in psychiatry in Asia. The objective of REAP BD was to investigate the prescription patterns of psychotropic medications across Asian countries. The rates of polypharmacy and psychotropic drug load were also analyzed. @*Methods@#The data collection was web-based. Prescription patterns were categorized as (1) mood stabilizer monotherapy: one mood stabilizer; (2) antipsychotic monotherapy: one antipsychotic; (3) simple polypharmacy: one mood stabilizer and one antipsychotic; and (4) complex polypharmacy: ≥ 2 mood stabilizers or/and antipsychotics. The psychotropic drug load in each patient was calculated using the defined daily dose method. @*Results@#Among 2003 patients with BD (52.1% female, 42.4 years) from 12 countries, 1,619 (80.8%) patients received mood stabilizers, 1,644 (82.14%) received antipsychotics, and 424 (21.2%) received antidepressants, with 14.7% mood stabilizer monotherapy, 13.4% antipsychotic monotherapy, 48.9% simple polypharmacy, 20.3% complex polypharmacy, and 2.6% other therapy. The average psychotropic drug load was 2.05 ± 1.40. Results varied widely between countries. @*Conclusion@#Over 70% of psychotropic regimens involved polypharmacy, which accords with the high prevalence of polypharmacy in BD under a permissive criterion (2 or more core psychotropic drugs) worldwide. Notably, ≥ 80% of our sample received antipsychotics, which may indicate an increasing trend in antipsychotic use for BD treatment.

A Call for a Rational Polypharmacy Policy: International Insights From Psychiatrists

Objective@#Recently, rational polypharmacy approaches have been proposed, regardless of the lower risk and cost of monotherapy. Considering monotherapy as first-line treatment and polypharmacy as rational treatment, a balanced attitude toward polypharmacy is recommended. However, the high prevalence of polypharmacy led the Japanese government to establish a polypharmacy reduction policy. Based on this, the association between the policy and psychiatrists’ attitude toward polypharmacy has been under debate. @*Methods@#We developed an original questionnaire about Psychiatrists’ attitudes toward polypharmacy (PAP). We compared the PAP scores with the treatment decision-making in clinical case vignettes. Multiple regression analyses were performed to quantify associations of explanatory variables including policy factors and PAP scores. The anonymous questionnaires were administered to psychiatrists worldwide. @*Results@#The study included 347 psychiatrists from 34 countries. Decision-making toward polypharmacy was associated with high PAP scores. Multiple regression analysis revealed that low PAP scores were associated with the policy factor (β=-0.20, p=0.004). The culture in Korea was associated with high PAP scores (β=0.34, p<0.001), whereas the culture in India and Nepal were associated with low scores (β=-0.15, p=0.01, and β=-0.17, p=0.006, respectively). @*Conclusion@#Policy on polypharmacy may influence psychiatrists’ decision-making. Thus, policies considering rational polypharmacy should be established.

Real-life effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of amlodipine/valsartan or amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide single-pill combination in patients with hypertension from Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: EXCITE (clinical EXperienCe of amlodIpine and valsarTan in hypErtension) evaluated the real-life effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of single-pill combinations (SPCs) of amlodipine/valsartan (Aml/Val) and amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Aml/Val/HCTZ) in patients with hypertension from 13 countries in the Middle East and Asia. Here, we present data from Pakistan. METHODS: This was a 26-week observational, multicenter, prospective, open-label study. At week 26, change from baseline in mean sitting systolic (msSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) and the proportion of patients achieving BP goal (SBP/DBP <140/90 mmHg; <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes) and response rates (SBP <140 mmHg [130 mmHg for patients with diabetes] or reduction of ≥20 mmHg; DBP <90 mmHg [80 mmHg for patients with diabetes] or reduction of ≥10 mmHg), were evaluated. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) was recorded as safety variables. Subjective assessment of effectiveness, compliance and tolerability was done by the physician. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients with hypertension (mean age of 48 years) were prescribed Aml/Val (n = 471, 94%) or Aml/Val/HCTZ (n = 29, 6%); 439 (87.8%) patients completed the study. At week 26, the mean BP decreased from 153.4/91.1 mmHg at baseline to 128.9/78.4 mmHg in the Aml/Val cohort (-24.5/-12.7 mmHg; p < 0.0001) and from 171.6/99.3 mmHg at baseline to 127.7/77.4 mmHg (-43.9/-21.9 mmHg; p < 0.0001) in the Aml/Val/HCTZ cohort. BP goals were achieved by 57% and 55.2% of patients in the Aml/Val and Aml/Val/HCTZ cohorts, respectively. A total of 40 (8%) patients reported at least one AE during the study period. Most common AEs included nausea (1.6%), headache (1.2%), vomiting (1.2%), and edema (1.2%). Most patients in Aml/Val cohort and all patients in Aml/Val/HCTZ cohort rated the effectiveness, compliance and tolerability as 'good' or 'very good'. CONCLUSIONS: Aml/Val with or without HCTZ in a SPC was effective and well-tolerated for BP reduction in this cohort of patients with hypertension from Pakistan.

Community-based rehabilitation and the Clubhouse Model as means to recovery and mental health services reform / Rehabilitación basada en la comunidad y el modelo Clubhouse como medio de recuperación y reforma de los servicios de salud mental

The article focuses on the trends of community-based rehabilitation (CBR) and the psychosocial Clubhouse rehabilitation model (CH) as tools for mental health (MH) policy reforms. It is based on documentation of the transnational project ôEmpowering Adults with Mental Illness for Learning and Social Inclusion in the years 2010-2012õ and other sources. The collection of data and subsequent analysis were prepared in the context of about 30 international MH policy recommendations from the 1990s until 2012. The documents were analyzed and compared with different recovery-oriented approaches like the CH model and with the key concepts of rehabilitation science, linked with the recent trends of the psychosocial rehabilitation. Some of the most important intergovernmental MH policy recommendations are the United Nations (UN) Convention on Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD, UN 2006), the joint CBR û Guidelines of the WHO (2010), ILO, UNESCO and several international associations as the WAPR (WAPR & WHO Consensus Statement 1996), as well as the WHO Pyramid Framework for the Optimal mix of MH services (WHO 2007), complemented with the WHOÆs Comprehensive MH Action Plan 2013-2020 approved in May 2013. All these sources include the spectrum of MH disorders. The combining factors are the human rights û based on a more holistic understanding of the disabilities instead of a merely medical approach. All the above recommendations are aimed at worldwide utilization.

Se examinan las tendencias de rehabilitación basada en la comunidad (CBR) y el modelo de rehabilitación psicosocial denominado Clubhouse (CH) como instrumentos de políticas de reforma de la Salud Mental (MH). El trabajo se basa en documentación del proyecto transnacional ôEmpoderamiento de adultos con enfermedad mental para aprendizaje e inclusión social en 2010-2012õ además de otras fuentes. La colección de datos y subsecuentes análisis se prepararon en el contexto de cerca de 30 recomendaciones internacionales de políticas de salud mental desde los años 90 hasta el 2012. Los documentos fueron analizados y comparados con diferentes enfoques orientados a la recuperación, tales como el modelo CH, y con conceptos clave de la ciencia de Rehabilitación, vinculados con tendencias recientes de la rehabilitación psicosocial. Algunas de las más importantes recomendaciones intergubernamentales de políticas de salud mental son las Guías conjuntas de Trabajo de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y UNESCO y varias asociaciones internacionales tales como la Asociación Mundial de Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica (WAPR) y el Marco Piramidal de la OMS para la óptima combinación de servicios de Salud Mental, complementados con el Plan Integral de Acción en Salud Mental 2013-2020 aprobado por la OMS este año. Todas estas fuentes incluyen el espectro total de trastornos mentales. Factores de combinación son los derechos humanos, basados en una comprensión más holística de las discapacidades en lugar de un enfoque meramente médico. Todas estas recomendaciones están orientadas a su utilización a nivel global.

Toxicity, biodistribution, and convection-enhanced delivery of the boronated porphyrin BOPP in the 9L intracerebral rat glioma model.

PURPOSE: To investigate the toxicity, biodistribution, and convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of a boronated porphyrin (BOPP) that was designed for boron neutron capture therapy and photodynamic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For the toxicity study, Fischer 344 rats were injected with graded concentrations of BOPP (35-100 mg/kg) into the tail vein. For boron biodistribution studies, 9L tumor-bearing rats received BOPP either systematically (intravenously) or locally. RESULTS: All rats that received 70 mg/kg BOPP and 70% of rats that received < or = 60 mg/kg BOPP i.v. either had to be euthanized or died within 4 days of injection. In the biodistribution study, boron levels were relatively high in liver, kidney, spleen, and adrenal gland tissue, and moderate levels were found in all other organs. The maximum tumor boron concentration was 21.4 mug/g at 48 h after i.v. injection; this concentration of boron in brain tumors is at the low end of the range considered optimal for therapy. In addition, the tumor/blood ratio (approximately 1.2) was not optimal. When BOPP was delivered directly into intracerebral 9L tumors with CED, we obtained tumor boron concentrations much greater than those obtained by i.v. injection. Convection-enhanced delivery of 1.5 mg BOPP produced an average tumor boron level of 519 mug/g and a tumor/blood ratio of approximately 1850:1. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that changing the method of BOPP delivery from i.v. to CED significantly enhances the boron concentration in tumors and produces very favorable tumor/brain and tumor/blood ratios.