Trends in disease severity and quality of life outcome measures in pemphigus clinical trials: A scoping review.

Pemphigus represents a spectrum of autoimmune-mediated blistering diseases associated with high morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Despite an increase in pemphigus clinical trials, the varied instrument measurements of disease severity and QoL outcomes make comparisons between studies challenging. This study aimed to evaluate trends in the use of disease severity and QoL outcome measurements in pemphigus clinical trials. A review of pemphigus clinical trials was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up until September 2023. Only pemphigus randomized clinical trials that assessed at least one disease severity and/or QoL outcome were included. Overall, 53 clinical trials were eligible for this review. All clinical trials evaluated a disease severity outcome, with the Pemphigus Disease Area Index being the most used validated questionnaire (28.3% of trials) and more popular after 2015 (47.8% of trials since). The autoimmune bullous skin disorder intensity score (7.6%) and visual analogue measurements (7.6%) have fallen out of favour. Most studies now include lab parameters (56.5% of trials after 2015), with anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibody levels (30.2%), immunoglobulins (IgG and/or IgM and IgA) (11.3%), and anti-drug antibody levels (7.6%) being frequently evaluated. A small portion of trials evaluated QoL (26.5% of studies), with the autoimmune bullous quality of life being the most common (15.1%), however QoL utilization as an outcome measure has been increasing since 2015 (61.1% of trials since). Standardising the use of validated outcome measurements allows for better data interpretation, comparability and clinical application of results.

Dynamic gating of perceptual flexibility by non-classically responsive cortical neurons.

The ability to flexibly respond to sensory cues in dynamic environments is essential to adaptive auditory-guided behaviors. Cortical spiking responses during behavior are highly diverse, ranging from reliable trial-averaged responses to seemingly random firing patterns. While the reliable responses of 'classically responsive' cells have been extensively studied for decades, the contribution of irregular spiking 'non-classically responsive' cells to behavior has remained underexplored despite their prevalence. Here, we show that flexible auditory behavior results from interactions between local auditory cortical circuits comprised of heterogeneous responses and inputs from secondary motor cortex. Strikingly, non-classically responsive neurons in auditory cortex were preferentially recruited during learning, specifically during rapid learning phases when the greatest gains in behavioral performance occur. Population-level decoding revealed that during rapid learning mixed ensembles comprised of both classically and non-classically responsive cells encode significantly more task information than homogenous ensembles of either type and emerge as a functional unit critical for learning. Optogenetically silencing inputs from secondary motor cortex selectively modulated non-classically responsive cells in the auditory cortex and impaired reversal learning by preventing the remapping of a previously learned stimulus-reward association. Top-down inputs orchestrated highly correlated non-classically responsive ensembles in sensory cortex providing a unique task-relevant manifold for learning. Thus, non-classically responsive cells in sensory cortex are preferentially recruited by top-down inputs to enable neural and behavioral flexibility.

Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography for the Diagnosis of Skin Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

A line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) combines confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography into a single, rapid, easy-to-use device. This meta-analysis was performed to determine the reliability of LC-OCT for diagnosing malignant skin tumors. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science databases, and the Cochrane Library were searched for research studies in the English language from inception till December 2023. To assess quality and the risk of bias, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used. The sensitivity and specificity of each study were calculated. The bivariate summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the linear mixed model. Five studies with 904 reported per lesion analyses in our study; the specificity and sensitivity ranged from 67% to 97% and 72% to 92%, respectively. The pooled specificity and sensitivity were 91% (95% CI: 76-97%) and 86.9% (95% CI: 81.8-90.8%), respectively. The summary sensitivity and specificity from the bivariate approach are 86.9% (95% CI: 81.8-90.8%) and 91.1% (95% CI: 76.7-97.0%), respectively. The area under the curve is 0.914. LC-OCT shows great sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing malignant skin tumors. However, due to the limited number of studies included in our meta-analysis, it is premature to elucidate the true potential of LC-OCT.

Impact of P-gp inhibition on systemic exposure of pralsetinib and dosing considerations.

A study to determine the impact of cyclosporine (Neoral), an inhibitor of P-gp, on the pharmacokinetics of pralsetinib (trade name GAVRETO®) was conducted in 15 healthy adult volunteers. A single 200 mg dose of pralsetinib was administered orally alone and in combination with cyclosporine with a 9-day washout between treatments. Co-administration with cyclosporine resulted in a clinically relevant increase in pralsetinib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) with associated geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of 148% (109, 201) and 181% (136, 241), respectively. These findings provide insight into concomitant dosing of pralsetinib with inhibitors of P-gp given the increases in pralsetinib exposure observed when administered with cyclosporine. Based on these results, co-administration of pralsetinib with P-gp inhibitors is not recommended. In the event that co-administration cannot be avoided, it is recommended that the dose of pralsetinib be reduced.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of polatuzumab vedotin in patients with previously untreated DLBCL from the POLARIX study.

Polatuzumab vedotin is a CD79b-directed antibody-drug conjugate that targets B cells and delivers the cytotoxic payload monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). The phase III POLARIX study (NCT03274492) evaluated polatuzumab vedotin in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHP) as first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To examine dosing decisions for this regimen, population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis, using a previously developed popPK model, and exposure-response (ER) analysis, were performed. The popPK analysis showed no clinically meaningful relationship between cycle 6 (C6) antibody-conjugated (acMMAE)/unconjugated MMAE area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) or maximum concentration, and weight, sex, ethnicity, region, mild or moderate renal impairment, mild hepatic impairment, or other patient and disease characteristics. In the ER analysis, C6 acMMAE AUC was significantly associated with longer progression-free and event-free survival (both p = 0.01). An increase of <50% in acMMAE/unconjugated MMAE exposure did not lead to a clinically meaningful increase in adverse events of special interest. ER data and the benefit-risk profile support the use of polatuzumab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks with R-CHP for six cycles in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.

Exploring the Impact of Hepatic Impairment on Pralsetinib Pharmacokinetics.

Pralsetinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of metastatic rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Pralsetinib is primarily eliminated by the liver and hence hepatic impairment (HI) is likely alter its pharmacokinetics (PK). Mild HI has been shown to have minimal impact on the PK of pralsetinib. This hepatic impairment study aimed to determine the pralsetinib PK, safety and tolerability in subjects with moderate and severe HI, as defined by the Child-Pugh and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) classification systems, in comparison to subjects with normal hepatic function. Based on the Child-Pugh classification, subjects with moderate and severe HI had similar systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC0-∞]) to pralsetinib, with AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios (GMR) of 1.12 and 0.858, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. Results based on the NCI-ODWG classification criteria were comparable; the AUC0-∞ GMR were 1.22 and 0.858, respectively, for subjects with moderate and severe HI per NCI-ODWG versus those with normal hepatic function. These results suggested that moderate and severe hepatic impairment did not have a meaningful impact on the exposure to pralsetinib, thus not warranting a dose adjustment in this population.

UGT1A4 Polymorphism is not Associated with a Clinically Relevant Change in Giredestrant Exposure.

PURPOSE: Giredestrant is a potent, orally bioavailable, small-molecule selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader (SERD) that is being developed for the treatment of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. In vitro, giredestrant was primarily metabolized by UGT1A4. The goal of this study was to investigate if UGT1A4 polymorphism had a clinically relevant impact on giredestrant exposure. METHODS: Genotyping and pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 118 and 61 patients in two clinical studies, GO39932 [NCT03332797] and acelERA Breast Cancer [NCT04576455], respectively. RESULTS: The overall allelic frequencies of UGT1A4*2 and UGT1A4*3 were 3.3% and 11%, respectively. Giredestrant exposure was consistent between patients with wild-type UGT1A4 and UGT1A4*2 and *3 polymorphisms, with no clinically relevant difference observed. In addition, haplotype analysis indicated that no other UGT1A4 variants were significantly associated with giredestrant exposure. CONCLUSION: Therefore, this study indicates that UGT1A4 polymorphism status is unlikely a clinically relevant factor to impact giredestrant exposure and giredestrant can be administered at the same dose level regardless of patients' UGT1A4 polymorphism status.

Comprehensive Outcome Assessment and Quality of Life Following Epilepsy Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Seizure freedom without deficits is the primary goal for epilepsy surgery. However, patients with medically refractory epilepsy commonly suffer from many co-morbidities related to mood, cognition, and sleep as well as social problems and resultant stigma. While epilepsy surgery literature does describe quality of life (QOL) and neuropsychological outcomes, there is a paucity of information on various common non-seizure outcomes, especially pertaining to mood, sleep, cognition, and social aspects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of various non-seizure parameters on post-epilepsy surgery QOL. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients operated for refractory epilepsy at least 1 year prior to initiation of this study were included and classified as seizure-free (group 1) or non-seizure-free (group 2). QOL was assessed using the QOLIE-31 instrument; patients with a T score less than 40 were categorized as "poor QOL." Non-seizure parameters assessed were cognition, mood disturbances, social improvement, social stigma, and sleep disturbances. Categorization into "good" and "poor" outcome subgroups on each item was carried out by dichotomization of scores. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (16 F) [mean age 23.5 ± 5.6 years] were evaluated; 26 were seizure-free (group 1). In this group, impaired memory, lower language scores, depression, not having been employed, not receiving education prior to surgery, and experiencing social stigma were factors significantly associated with poor QOL. In group 2, all patients had poor QOL scores. CONCLUSION: Non-seizure factors related to common epilepsy co-morbidities and social issues are highly prevalent among seizure-free patients reporting poor QOL after epilepsy surgery.