A Qualitative Study of Racial, Ethnic, and Cultural Experiences of Minority Clinicians During Agitation Care in the Emergency Department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic bias in health care has been documented at structural, organizational, and clinical levels, impacting emergency care, including agitation management in the emergency department (ED). Little is known about the experiences of racial and ethnic minority ED clinicians caring for racial and ethnic minority groups, especially during their agitated state. The objective of this study was to explore the lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority ED clinicians who have treated patients with agitation in the ED. METHODS: We performed semistructured individual interviews of Black, Latino, and multiracial clinicians who worked at 1 of 3 EDs from an urban quaternary care medical center in the Northeast United States between August 2020 and June 2022. We performed thematic analysis through open coding of initial transcripts and identifying additional codes through sequential iterative rounds of group discussion. Once the codebook was finalized and applied to all transcripts, the team identified key themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Of the 27 participants interviewed, 14 (52%) identified as Black, 9 (33%) identified as Hispanic/Latino, and 4 (15%) identified as multiracial and/or other race and ethnicity. Three primary themes emerged from racial and ethnic minority clinician experiences of managing agitation: witness of perceived bias during clinical interactions with patients of color who bear racialized presumptions of agitation, moral injury and added workload to address perceived biased agitation management practices while facing discrimination in the workplace, and natural advocacy and allyship for agitated patients of color based on a shared identity and life experience. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that through their shared minority status, racial and ethnic minority clinicians had a unique vantage point to observe perceived bias in the management of agitation in minority patients. Although they faced added challenges as racial and ethnic minority clinicians, their allyship offered potential mitigation strategies for addressing disparities in caring for an underserved and historically marginalized patient population.

Revisiting "Excited Delirium": Does the Diagnosis Reflect and Promote Racial Bias?

INTRODUCTION: "Excited delirium" (ExD) is purported to represent a certain type of agitated state that can lead to unexpected death. The 2009 "White Paper Report on Excited Delirium Syndrome," authored by the American College of Emergency Medicine (ACEP) Excited Delirium Task Force, continues to play a pivotal role in defining ExD. Since that report was produced, there has been an increasing appreciation that the label has been applied more often to Black people. METHODS: Our aim was to analyze the language of the 2009 report, the role of potential stereotypes, and the mechanisms that may potentially encourage bias. RESULTS: Our evaluation of the diagnostic criteria for ExD proposed in the 2009 report shows that it relies on persistent racial stereotypes: eg, unusual strength, decreased sensitivity to pain, and bizarre behavior. Research indicates that use of such stereotypes could encourage biased diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the emergency medicine community avoid use of the concept ExD and that ACEP withdraw implicit or explicit support of the report.

Impact of Frailty on Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Patients Presenting with an Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if baseline frailty was an independent predictor of adverse events (AEs) and in-hospital mortality in patients being treated for acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Trauma Database (NTDB) from 2017. Adult patients (>18 years old) with acute cervical SCI were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic and procedural coding systems. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts based on the criteria of the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5): mFI = 0, mFI = 1, or mFI≥2. Patient demographics, comorbidities, type of injury, diagnostic and treatment modality, AEs, and in-patient mortality were assessed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of in-hospital AEs and mortality. RESULTS: Of 8986 patients identified, 4990 (55.5%) were classified as mFI = 0, 2328 (26%) as mFI = 1, and 1668 (18.5%) as mFI≥2. On average, the mFI≥2 cohort was 5 years older than the mFI = 1 cohort and 22 years older than the mFI = 0 cohort (P < 0.001). Most patients in each cohort sustained either complete SCI or central cord syndrome after a fall or transport accident (mFI = 0, 77.31% vs. mFI = 1, 89.5% vs. mFI≥2, 93.65%). With respect to in-hospital events, the proportion of patients who experienced any AE increased significantly along with frailty score (mFI = 0, 30.42% vs. mFI = 1, 31.74% vs. mFI≥2, 34.95%; P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality followed a similar trend, increasing with frailty score (mFI = 0, 10.53% vs. mFI = 1, 11.33% vs. mFI≥2, 16.23%; P < 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, both mFI = 1 1.21 (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.4; P = 0.008) and mFI≥2 (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05-1.45; P = 0.012) predicted AEs, whereas only mFI≥2 was found to be a predictor for in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.83; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing frailty is associated with an increased risk of AEs and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing treatment for cervical SCI.