Hypothermia is associated with a low ETCO2 and low pH-stat PaCO2 in refractory cardiac arrest.

AIMS: The end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) is frequently measured in cardiac arrest (CA) patients, for management and for predicting survival. Our goal was to study the PaCO2 and ETCO2 in hypothermic cardiac arrest patients. METHODS: We included patients with refractory CA assessed for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Hypothermic patients were identified from previously prospectively collected data from Poland, France and Switzerland. The non-hypothermic CA patients were identified from two French cohort studies. The primary parameters of interest were ETCO2 and PaCO2 at hospital admission. We analysed the data according to both alpha-stat and pH-stat strategies. RESULTS: We included 131 CA patients (39 hypothermic and 92 non-hypothermic). Both ETCO2 (p < 0.001) and pH-stat PaCO2 (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in hypothermic compared to non-hypothermic patients, which was not the case for alpha-stat PaCO2 (p = 0.15). The median PaCO2-ETCO2 gradient was greater for hypothermic compared to non-hypothermic patients when using the alpha-stat method (46 mmHg vs 30 mmHg, p = 0.007), but not when using the pH-stat method (p = 0.10). Temperature was positively correlated with ETCO2 (p < 0.01) and pH-stat PaCO2 (p < 0.01) but not with alpha-stat PaCO2 (p = 0.5). The ETCO2 decreased by 0.5 mmHg and the pH-stat PaCO2 by 1.1 mmHg for every decrease of 1° C of the temperature. The proportion of survivors with an ETCO2 ≤ 10 mmHg at hospital admission was 45% (9/25) for hypothermic and 12% (2/17) for non-hypothermic CA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermic CA is associated with a decrease of the ETCO2 and pH-stat PaCO2 compared with non-hypothermic CA. ETCO2 should not be used in hypothermic CA for predicting outcome.

Quality of acute heart failure treatment in France: Data from REseau Nord-Alpin des Urgences (RENAU).

BACKGROUND: Although mortality due to acute heart failure has decreased, its prevalence in France is still high. The aim of this study was to examine the quality of acute heart failure treatment in French emergency departments (EDs) with reference to subsequently published European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations. METHODS: The medical records of patients with acute pulmonary oedema (as a marker for acute heart failure) admitted to the EDs of 11 French hospitals in 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 834 patients were included (median [interquartile range] age 84 [78-89] years; 48.6% male). Rates of compliance of initial management in 2013 to subsequently published 2015 recommendations were as follows: (1) thoracic ultrasound was performed in 17.3%; (2) loop diuretics were given in 75.9%; at a correct dose (among those for whom this was calculable) in 40.0% (3); intravenous nitrates were given in 21.7% of patients with systolic blood pressure>110mmHg; (4) non-invasive ventilation was initiated in 22.0% of patients with respiratory distress. Discharge summaries most often lacked a scheduled cardiologist follow-up (89.4%) and discharge patient weight (78.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The early management of patients with acute pulmonary oedema (as a marker of acute heart failure) in France in 2013 was quite different to recommendations published in 2015. A programme to implement the new recommendations is in place, and a repeat evaluation will be conducted in 2017.

Preventable deaths in a French regional trauma system: A six-year analysis of severe trauma mortality.

BACKGROUND: Analyzing mortality in a mature trauma system is useful to improve quality of care of severe trauma patients. Standardization of error reporting can be done using the classification of the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). The aim of our study was to describe preventable deaths in our trauma system and to classify errors according to the JCAHO taxonomy. METHODS: We performed a six-year retrospective study using the registry of the Northern French Alps trauma network (TRENAU). Consecutive patients who died in the prehospital field or within their stay at hospital were included. An adjudication committee analyzed deaths to identify preventable or potentially preventable deaths from 2009 to 2014. All errors were classified using the JCAHO taxonomy. RESULTS: Within the study period, 503 deaths were reported among 7484 consecutive severe trauma patients (overall mortality equal to 6.7%). Seventy-two (14%) deaths were judged as potentially preventable and 36 (7%) deaths as preventable. Using the JACHO taxonomy, 170 errors were reported. These errors were detected both in the prehospital setting and in the hospital phase. Most were related to clinical performance of physicians and consisted of rule-based or knowledge based failures. Prevention or mitigation of errors required an improvement of communication among caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of error reporting is the first step to improve the efficiency of trauma systems. Preventable deaths are frequently related to clinical performance in the early phase of trauma management. Universal strategies are necessary to prevent or mitigate these errors.

Relevance of early CT scan diagnosis of blunt diaphragmatic injury: A retrospective analysis from the Northern French Alps Emergency Network.

INTRODUCTION: Diaphragmatic rupture following blunt trauma occurs rarely. Classically described after high-velocity accidents, ruptures are often associated with multiple organ injuries. The diagnosis is sometimes difficult. The goal of this study was to analyze and to discuss the modalities of early radiologic diagnosis and management of these injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients seen between 2009 and 2017 within the Northern Alpine Emergency Network [REseau Nord Alpin des Urgences (RENAU)]. Clinical, radiologic and surgical data from all patients sustaining blunt diaphragmatic rupture were studied. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (18 men and 13 women), median age 44, were included. The principle mechanism of injury was road or traffic accidents for 22 patients. Diaphragmatic rupture occurred on the left side in 23 patients. Diagnosis was delayed in two patients, at 11 days and three months after the initial accident. Chest X-rays were diagnostic in 18 of 29 patients. CT scan was the reference investigation since it was performed in all patients and confirmed the diagnosis in 26 instances. Repair was surgical via a midline laparotomy in 27 patients, via laparoscopy in three, and via thoracoscopy in one. Three patients died. CONCLUSION: At urgent surgical exploration in the unstable blunt trauma patient, the surgeon should keep in mind the relatively poor diagnostic performance of chest X-rays. Accurate diagnosis relies on routine inspection of the diaphragmatic cupolas. In the stable trauma victim, contrast-enhanced abdomino-thoracic CT with reconstruction can lead to early diagnosis, which allows for repair under optimal conditions, whether by laparotomy, laparoscopy or thoracoscopy, according to local conditions and expertise.

Treatment of acute cardiac failure in the emergency department. Improve our practices? Data from the RESURCOR network.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the European Society of cardiology published guidelines on the pre-hospital and early hospital management of acute cardiac failure (ACF), which included: - use of intravenous vasodilators (nitrates) when systolic blood pressure is>110mmHg; - non-invasive ventilation if oxygen saturation is<90% and/or respiratory rate is>25/min despite nasal oxygen; - using a reduced dose of intravenous furosemide (20-40mg or equivalent of the oral morning dose if already on chronic diuretic therapy) and; - early performance of echocardiography. We sought to compare the gap between these recommendations and clinical practices in French emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We undertook a retrospective evaluation of clinical practices in 834 consecutive patients with ACF admitted in 2013 to the EDs of 16 French hospitals. Data, including patient characteristics and practices were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: Patients' mean±standard deviation age was 82±10 years and 49% were men. Clinical practices in relation to the guideline recommendations are shown in the Table 1. CONCLUSIONS: These initial data which precede publication of the current guidelines, show that use of nitrates, non-invasive ventilation, reduced diuretic dose and early echocardiography were relatively infrequent at the first point of medical care for patients presenting with ACF. These findings indicate the need for a sizable shift in practice in order to meet the new guideline recommendations. We will conduct a repeat evaluation in 2016, after implementation of a programme aimed to improve practices at these sites.

[Reperfusion in ST elevation myocardial infarction. From the guidelines to practice]. / Reperfusion des infarctus aigus avec sus-décalage du segment ST dans le RENAU/RESURCOR : des recommandations à la pratique.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines have recommendations for selecting the type of reperfusion (fibrinolysis or angioplasty) in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and suggest that emergency-care networks adapt these recommendations according to the local environment. AIM: To assess the proportions of STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis or angioplasty in accordance with regional guidelines. METHOD: Observational study based on a permanent registry of patients with STEMI of <12h duration in an emergency network in the French North Alps (Isère, Savoie, Haute-Savoie) from January 2009 to December 2012. RESULTS: The registry included 2620 patients. Reperfusion was given in 2425/2620 (93%) of patients. Reperfusion type was in accordance with recommendations in 1567/2620 (60%) patients. Guideline-recommended fibrinolysis and angioplasty were performed in 47% (656/1385) and 79% (911/1149) respectively, of patients. In multivariable analysis, variables independently associated with guideline-recommended reperfusion were: an age < 65 years (OR 1.60; 95%CI 1.33-1.90), being managed in Haute-Savoie versus Isère or Savoie (OR 1.38; 95%CI 1.12-1.71), an arterial tension < 100mmHg (OR 1.73; 95%CI 1.27-2.35), a cardiogenic shock (OR 0.50; 95%CI 0.30-0.84), a pacemaker or left bundle branch block (OR 0.49; 95%CI 0.28-0.88), and an initial management outside the network (followed by treatment in an interventional centre in the network) (OR 0.62; 95%CI 0.40-0.94). Patients initially treated by mobile intensive care units were more often reperfused in accordance with recommendations when admitted < 3 (versus ≥ 3) h following symptom onset (adjusted OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.61-2.59), while those initially treated by in-hospital emergency units were less often reperfused in accordance with recommendation when treated < 3h following symptom onset (adjusted OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.97). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (9.1% vs. 8.5%) and in-hospital mortality (6.4% vs. 5.1%) were not significantly different between patients reperfused in accordance with (versus not) recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of patients with STEMI were not reperfused with fibrinolysis or angioplasty in accordance with regional guidelines. Characterization of this population should allow us to improve guideline adherence.

[Impact of a trauma network on mortality in patients with severe pelvic trauma]. / Impact de la mise en place d'un réseau de soins en traumatologie sur la mortalité des patients traumatisés graves du bassin.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of a regional trauma network on intra-hospital mortality rates of patients admitted with severe pelvic trauma. STUDY: Retrospective observational study. PATIENTS: Sixty-five trauma patients with serious pelvic fracture (pelvic abbreviated injury scale [AIS] score of 3 or more). METHODS: Demographic, physiologic and biological parameters were recorded. Observed mortality rates were compared to predicted mortality according to the Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score methodology adjusted by a case mix variation model. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were admitted in a level I trauma centre (reference centre) and 36 in level II trauma centres (centres with interventional radiology facility and/or neurosurgery). Patients from the level I trauma centre were more severely injured than those who were admitted at the level II trauma centres (Injury Severity Score [ISS]: 30 [13-75] vs 22 [9-59]; P<0.01). Time from trauma to hospital admission was also longer in level I trauma centre (115 [50-290] min vs 90 [28-240] min, P <0.01). Observed mortality rates (14%; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, [1-26%]) were lower than the predicted mortality (29%; 95% CI [13-44%]) in the level I trauma centre. No difference in mortality rates was found in the level II trauma centres. CONCLUSION: The regional trauma network could screen the most severely injured patients with pelvic trauma to admit them at a level I trauma centre. The observed mortality of these patients was lower than the predicted mortality despite increased time from trauma to admission.

Trauma network for severely injured patients.

Survival after severe trauma may depend on a structured chain of care from the management at the scene of trauma to hospital care and rehabilitation. In the USA, the trauma system is organized according to a pre-hospital triage by paramedics to facilitate the admission of patients to tertiary trauma centres. In France, trauma patients are transported to the most suitable facility, according to the on-scene triage by an emergency physician. Because French hospital's resources become scarce and expensive, the access to all techniques of resuscitation after severe trauma is restricted to tertiary trauma centres, at the expense of prolonged duration of transfer to these centres with a possible impact on mortality. The Northern French Alps Emergency Network created a regional trauma network system in 2008. This organization was based upon the interplay between the resources of each hospital participating to the network and the categorization of trauma severity at the scene. A regional registry allows the assessment of trauma system, which has included 3,690 severe trauma patients within the past 3 years. Bystanders, medical call dispatch centres, and interdisciplinary trauma team should form a structured and continuous chain of care to allocate each severe trauma patient to the best place of treatment.

Current management of severe pelvic and perineal trauma.

Mortality associated with pelvic and perineal trauma (PPT) has fallen from 25% to 10% in the last decade thanks to progress accomplished in medical, surgical and interventional radiology domains (Dyer and Vrahas, 2006) [1]. The management strategy depends on the hemodynamic status of the patient (stable, unstable or extremely unstable). Open trauma requires specific treatment in addition to control of bleeding. All surgical centers can be confronted some day with patients with hemorrhagic PPT and for this reason, all surgeons should be familiar with the initial management. In expert centers, management of patients with severe PPT is complex, multidisciplinary and often requires several re-interventions. Obstetrical and sexual trauma, also requiring specific management, will not be dealt with herein.