RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), previously treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab with unsatisfactory results. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with nAMD switched to intravitreally administered faricimab from traditional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatments between September 2022 and April 2023 because of unsatisfactory response (maximal fluid-free interval ≤ 8 weeks). Faricimab was administered with a loading dose of four 4-weekly injections, followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. The primary outcome measures were maximum fluid-free interval after the switch and last assigned treatment interval. Secondary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural optical coherence tomography parameters. RESULTS: Thirty-three eyes of 33 patients were included. Patients were followed for a median of 72 weeks [interquartile range 61, 76]. Median maximum fluid-free treatment interval after switch to faricimab and the last assigned interval were significantly longer than before the switch (7 vs. 4 weeks, p < 0.001 and 8 vs. 5 weeks, p < 0.001, respectively). Significant improvements in central subfield thickness (353 vs. 281 µm), macular volume (2.46 vs. 2.16 mm3), and pigment epithelial detachment height (198 vs. 150 µm) were observed (all p < 0.001). BCVA remained stable at 0.4 versus 0.3 logMAR before switch (p = 0.190). One eye (3%) developed intraocular inflammation and one eye (3%) developed a retinal pigment epithelium tear. CONCLUSIONS: Faricimab improved anatomical outcomes and allowed longer treatment intervals in patients with nAMD previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapies with unsatisfactory response, reducing treatment burden. A favorable safety profile was observed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Progestins are commonly prescribed first-line drugs for endometriosis. High rates of non-response and intolerance to these drugs have been previously reported. However, no study to date has investigated the characteristics and comorbidities of patients taking progestins in relation to treatment outcomes, so identifying which patients will respond to or tolerate the treatment is currently impossible. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to identify risk factors for non-response and discontinuation of Dienogest (DNG) in women with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including women currently taking, or newly prescribed, DNG for endometriosis-associated pain presenting in the Endometriosis Clinic of the University Hospital of Bern between January 2017 and May 2018. Women with initiation of treatment directly after surgery for endometriosis were excluded. For all participants the symptoms and comorbidities were documented. Effectiveness, tolerability and discontinuation of DNG were the primary end points. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models were carried out to identify risk factors for non-response, intolerance and discontinuation of DNG. RESULTS: A sufficient or excellent treatment response was reported by 85/125 (68%) participants. Genital bleeding during the DNG treatment was negatively (OR 0.185, 95% CI 0.056-0.610, P = .006) and rASRM endometriosis stages III and IV were positively (OR 3.876, 95% CI 1.202-12.498, P = .023) correlated with the DNG response. When accounting for exclusively pretreatment factors, primary dysmenorrhea (OR 0.236, 95% CI 0.090-0.615, P = .003) and suspicion of adenomyosis (OR 0.347, 95% CI 0.135-0.894, P = .028) were inversely correlated with DNG response, and the latter was also correlated with treatment discontinuation (OR 3.189, 95% CI 1.247-8.153, P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Genital bleeding during the DNG treatment and low rASRM stages are independent risk factors for DNG non-response. Before treatment initiation, primary dysmenorrhea and suspicion of adenomyosis correlate with DNG non-response. The results could assist the clinician first to provide detailed information to women before treatment initiation, second to identify and possibly modify in-therapy factors correlated to treatment effectiveness and lastly to switch treatment on time if needed.