Assuntos
Eosinofilia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Vasculite/diagnóstico , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approved on-demand treatments for hereditary angioedema attacks need to be administered parenterally, a route of administration that is associated with delays in treatment or withholding of therapy. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, three-way crossover trial, we randomly assigned participants at least 12 years of age with type 1 or type 2 hereditary angioedema to take up to two oral doses of sebetralstat (300 mg or 600 mg) or placebo for an angioedema attack. The primary end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the beginning of symptom relief, defined as a rating of "a little better" on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (ratings range from "much worse" to "much better") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours after the first administration of the trial agent. Key secondary end points, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, were a reduction in attack severity (an improved rating on the Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGI-S] scale, with ratings ranging from "none" to "very severe") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours and complete attack resolution (a rating of "none" on the PGI-S scale) within 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 136 participants were assigned to one of six trial sequences, with 110 treating 264 attacks. The time to the beginning of symptom relief with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P<0.001 and P = 0.001 for the two comparisons, respectively), with median times of 1.61 hours (interquartile range, 0.78 to 7.04), 1.79 hours (1.02 to 3.79), and 6.72 hours (1.34 to >12), respectively. The time to reduction in the attack severity with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P = 0.004 and P = 0.003), with median times of 9.27 hours (interquartile range, 1.53 to >12), 7.75 hours (2.19 to >12), and more than 12 hours (6.23 to >12). The time to complete resolution was faster with the 300-mg and 600-mg doses than with placebo (P = 0.002 and P<0.001). The percentage of attacks with complete resolution within 24 hours was 42.5% with the 300-mg dose, 49.5% with the 600-mg dose, and 27.4% with placebo. Sebetralstat and placebo had similar safety profiles; no serious adverse events related to the trial agents were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Oral sebetralstat provided faster times to the beginning of symptom relief, reduction in attack severity, and complete attack resolution than placebo. (Funded by KalVista Pharmaceuticals; KONFIDENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05259917; EudraCT number, 2021-001226-21.).
Assuntos
Estudos Cross-Over , Humanos , Feminino , Método Duplo-Cego , Masculino , Adulto , Administração Oral , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angioedemas Hereditários/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Angioedema Hereditário Tipos I e II/tratamento farmacológico , PirazóisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a pain condition characterized by physical and psychological difficulties. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on FM patients and identify the role of two pain cognitions: psychological inflexibility in pain (PIPS) and pain catastrophizing (PCS), as mechanisms of change. METHODS: 95 FM patients (Mean ± SD: 49.18 ± 13.26 years) were randomly assigned to MBSR group therapy (n = 49) or a waitlist (WL) control group (n = 46). An adapted MBSR protocol for FM was employed. A series of measures were taken, covering FM symptoms, depression, perceived stress (PSS), PIPS and PCS. Three measurements were conducted: pre-intervention, post-intervention and 6-months follow up. RESULTS: Compared to WL controls, the MBSR group showed greater improvements in FM symptoms (F(1,78) = 2.81, p < 0.05), PSS (F(1,78) = 4.38, p < 0.05) and Depression (F(1,78) = 21.12, p < 0.001), with mostly medium effect sizes. Improvements in PSS (F(2,68) = 7.75, p < 0.05) and depression (F(2,68) = 15.68, p < 0.05) remained stable over six months. The effect of MBSR on FM and PSS was mediated by one's reported change in PIPS. The effect of MBSR on depression was mediated by one's reported change in PCS. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal the significant therapeutic potential of MBSR for FM patients, due to the emphasis on non-judging and acceptance of negative inner states. Furthermore, this research identified two important pain-related cognitions as mechanisms of change, suggesting that MBSR contributes to cognitive change, which enables the reduction of physical and psychological distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04304664.
Assuntos
Depressão , Fibromialgia , Atenção Plena , Estresse Psicológico , Humanos , Fibromialgia/terapia , Fibromialgia/psicologia , Atenção Plena/métodos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Masculino , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Depressão/terapia , Catastrofização/psicologia , Catastrofização/terapia , Dor/psicologia , CogniçãoRESUMO
Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is an immune-mediated skin disease that may require prolonged treatments. Currently, there are no recommendations for treatment discontinuation once CSU symptoms are controlled, particularly among patients primarily diagnosed with severe CSU. Objective: In this real-life study we aimed to describe our experience of omalizumab (Oma) treatment withdrawal in CSU and define biomarkers related to these outcomes. Methods: CSU patients followed at our allergy clinic from January 2016 to December 2022 were included. Response to Oma therapy, and Oma-withdrawal outcomes among patients who reached complete remission for >6 months were analyzed. Results: During the study period 192/335(%) CSU patients were categorized as severe-CSU and entitled to receive Oma according to our country's regulations. Of them, 131/192(68%) were considered "Oma-responders", and 95/131(72.5%) patients underwent gradual treatment withdrawal. Successful Oma-withdrawal was documented in 47/95(49.5%) whereas 48/95(50.5%) patients experienced flare and were defined as unsuccessful OMA-withdrawal. The first was associated with shorter disease duration 7.1 ± 7.4 years vs. 10.7 ± 9.4 (P = 0.042), lower baseline-IgE 81.6 ± 84.1IU/ml vs. 324.7 ± 555.9 (P = 0.005), and lower baseline-eosinophils count 131.4 ± 110.5 vs. 195.6 ± 98.4 (P = 0.043) in comparison to failure of Oma-withdrawal group. Conclusion: OMA may be successfully withdrawn in up to 50% of severe CSU patients following complete remission of disease symptoms, utilizing a gradual withdrawal protocol. Oma-withdrawal failure was linked with longer duration of disease as well as high IgE and eosinophil counts prior to initiation of Oma therapy. These parameters may enable the design of a treatment withdrawal algorithm.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess factors associated with failure of intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) monotherapy as the first-line treatment for thyroid eye disease (TED) and to identify patients who might benefit from supplementing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to IVMP. METHODS: Data for all patients with TED treated with IVMP according to the EUGOGO protocol in our center between 2016-2021 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (mean age 51.32 ± 14 years, 27 females) were enrolled. The mean time from first reported symptoms to first IVMP treatment was 12.1 ± 5.59 months (range 0-120). The mean clinical activity score (CAS) before treatment and at a mean of 5 and 12.2 weeks after treatment initiation was 6.00, 2.96, and 1.81, respectively (P < 0.01). Twenty-one patients (44.68%) were recommended second-line treatment: nine due to no response or worsening of CAS, six due to partial response, four with good response but early relapse after completion of treatment, and one due to late relapse. Eighteen of those 21 patients received second-line treatment which included rituximab (n = 7), MMF (n = 6), a second course of IVMP (n = 4), and tocilizumab (n = 1). Serum thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) levels were higher in patients who received second-line treatment compared with patients who responded well to first-line IVMP monotherapy at presentation (2135% vs 1159%, P = 0.05) and after completion of first-line treatment (2201% vs. 986%, P = 0.043). DISCUSSION: TED patients requiring second-line treatment after failed IVMP monotherapy had higher baseline and post-first-line treatment serum TSI levels. Those with elevated TSI may benefit from dual therapy (IVMP and MMF) and require closer monitoring.
Assuntos
Oftalmopatia de Graves , Metilprednisolona , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulinas Estimuladoras da Glândula Tireoide , Oftalmopatia de Graves/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , RecidivaRESUMO
Background: IgA vasculitis and hypersensitivity reactions following exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are very rarely associated with purpura fulminans (PF). The latter is a coagulation event characterised by decreased levels of protein C and a rapidly progressive purpuric rash, often leading to ischaemia, amputations and death. Case summary: A previously healthy 66-year-old man presented with a vasculitic rash and abdominal pain following exposure to naproxen (NSAID), which quickly deteriorated to purpura fulminans-like eruption and skin necrosis, mainly involving the face and hands. The presence of IgA sediments on skin biopsy and decreased levels of complement as well as protein C pointed to an immune-mediated inflammatory process. Dramatic clinical escalation with immediate risk to organs and life required an aggressive and broad-spectrum therapeutic approach in an intensive care setting. Clinical improvement and complete reconstitution of protein C were achieved following plasma exchange with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and immunosuppression with glucocorticoids with no persistent organ damage. Conclusions: This rare case illustrates the catastrophic cross links between NSAIDs, IgA-mediated hypersensitivity vasculitis and purpura fulminans-like syndrome. A high index of suspicion is required for the evaluation of environmental exposures such as drugs and infections in patients with vasculitis and/or purpura. A rapid and comprehensive therapeutic approach should be implemented to avoid multi-organ damage, amputations and death. Complete avoidance of the offending agent is key for future prevention of recurrence. LEARNING POINTS: This case illustrates a rare cross link between a commonly used drug (NSAIDs) and severe, life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions (IgA vasculitis and purpura fulminans-like eruption).These events require a high index of suspicion and emphasise the importance of considering environmental exposures such as drugs in the immediate diagnosis of both conditions.In addition to long-term drug avoidance, early and aggressive interventions are required to avoid organ damage, amputations or death.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated heart valve disease (HVD) is well described. Nonetheless, limited data exist on clinical parameters associated with the course of primary APS (pAPS) patients with HVD. The goal of this study was to assess clinical features and related outcomes in patients with APS associated HVD. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, we identified 33 pAPS patients with HVD (pAPS-HVD group) and compared their clinical course with 128 pAPS patients with normal heart valves on echocardiography (pAPS-control group). RESULTS: pAPS-HVD patients had more cerebrovascular events 56.3% vs 25% (p= 0.005) and livedo reticularis 24.2% vs 7.8% (p= 0.013) than pAPS-controls. Furthermore, catastrophic-APS (CAPS) (12.1% vs 2.4%, p= 0.034), recurrent thrombosis (33.3% vs 4.7%, p< 0.001), and need for advanced therapy (i.e. IVIG, plasmapheresis or rituximab) were more frequent in pAPS-HVD patients. Anti-B2GPI-IgG. [84.8% vs 63.2% (p= 0.034)], anti-cardiolipin IgG [90.9% vs. 64.8% (p= 0.005)] and triple positive aPL [75.8% vs 56.5% (p= 0.047)] were commoner in pAPS-HVD patients vs pAPS-controls. Ten of the 33 patients with pAPS-HVD underwent valve surgery which was associated with male gender, smoking, arterial limb ischaemia and livedo reticularis. CONCLUSION: pAPS-HVD patients had a more severe APS clinical course including CAPS and thrombotic events as well as with specific serology namely IgG isotype aPL antibodies and triple positivity. Our data suggest that pAPS-HVD represents a high-risk subgroup of APS patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While several studies have noted smell impairment in schizophrenia, it is unclear whether this impairment extends to acute psychosis and whether it is associated with more severe illness as expressed in extended hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the olfactory function of patients in an acute psychotic state and correlate it with clinical symptomatology and length of hospitalization. METHODS: Olfactory function was assessed in 20 patients with schizophrenia in their first week of hospital admission for acute psychosis compared with matched controls. Olfaction was evaluated via three stages: threshold, discrimination, and identification of different odors utilizing the Sniffin' Sticks test battery. RESULTS: Schizophrenia patients scored significantly lower on total smell score, discrimination, and identification abilities. A significant association was observed between hospitalization duration and total smell score and smell discrimination. No significant associations between smell and clinical symptomatology were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Study observations confirm impaired sense of smell in schizophrenia patients and suggest that smell impairment may be a potential marker of more serious illness as expressed in longer hospital stay.
Assuntos
Transtornos do Olfato , Transtornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Olfato , Esquizofrenia/complicações , Transtornos do Olfato/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Olfato/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
It has been 3 years since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was initially declared, and 2 years have passed since the first COVID-19 vaccines were introduced. Since then, 13.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered worldwide, largely with multiple doses of messenger RNA vaccines. Although mild local and systemic adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination are common, serious adverse effects following immunization are rare, particularly when compared with the large number of vaccine doses administered. Immediate and delayed reactions are relatively common and present similarly to allergic and hypersensitivity reactions. Despite this, reactions generally do not commonly recur, cause sequelae, or contraindicate revaccination. In this Clinical Management Review, we provide an updated perspective of COVID-19 vaccine reactions, their spectrum and epidemiology, and recommended approaches to evaluation and management.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess valve surgery outcomes in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: A retrospective study assessing complications and mortality rate and possible factors associated with adverse outcomes of APS patients undergoing valve surgery in two tertiary medical centers. RESULTS: Twenty-six APS patients (median age at surgery 47.5 years) who underwent valve surgery were detected, of whom 11 (42.3%) had secondary APS. The mitral valve was most commonly involved (n = 15, 57.7%). A valve replacement was performed in 24 operations (92.3%), 16 of which (66.7%) were mechanical valves. Fourteen (53.8%) patients sustained severe complications, and four of them died. The presence of mitral regurgitation (MR) was associated with severe complications and mortality (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 12.5 (1.85-84.442), p = 0.008, for complications. All deceased patients had MR (p = 0.033). The presence of Libman-Sacks endocarditis (LSE) (7.333 (1.272-42.294), p = 0.045), low C3 (6.667 (1.047-42.431), p = 0.05) and higher perioperative prednisone doses (15 ± 21.89 vs. 1.36 ± 3.23 mg/day, p = 0.046) were also associated with complications. A lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was associated with mortality (30.75 ± 19.47 vs. 70.68 ± 34.44 mL/min, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Significant morbidity and mortality were observed among APS patients undergoing valve surgery. MR was associated with mortality and complications. LSE, low complement and higher doses of corticosteroids were associated with complications, while a low GFR was associated with mortality.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Over 95% of healthy subjects develop anti-COVID IgG antibodies after receiving two doses of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. In comparison, 20%-30% of SLE patients do not seroconvert following 1-2 doses of COVID vaccines, potentially due to immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to assess immunogenicity and safety of BNT vaccine in SLE patients treated with Belimumab and especially the yield of a booster third dose in this population. METHODS: SLE patients treated with Belimumab in the Sheba Medical Center, Israel, were included in this study. All were recommended to receive the BNT vaccine according to national guidelines; and were advised to perform serologic tests after receiving second and third doses. Clinical data included demographics, SLE treatments, adverse effects to vaccines and SLEDAI scores performed 2 weeks before vaccinations and 6-12 weeks after receiving the second or third dose of the vaccine. RESULTS: Our cohort included 17 patients, 14 (82.35%) females, median age 50 ± 14.2 years, and disease duration 12 ± 10.57 years. Belimumab therapy was given for a mean of 6 ± 2.5 years. Of them, 15/17 patients received 3-doses of BNT vaccine. Serologic assessment was performed for 10 patients, 7/10(70%) became seropositive following the second dose, while 2/3 patients seroconverted only after the third dose. Vaccinations were well tolerated with minimal adverse events and no disease flares. SLEDAI scores before and after vaccinations were 4 ± 3.8 and 4 ± 2.7 (p = 0.69), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with the BNT vaccine is efficacious and safe for SLE patients treated with Belimumab. Following the third dose of vaccine, immunogenicity among SLE patients mounted to 90%, thereby approximating the general healthy population. No SLE disease flares and/or significant adverse events were noted in our cohort. Assessment of seroconversion and consideration of subsequent boosters of COVID-vaccine should be considered in this group of patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacina BNT162 , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Anticorpos AntiviraisRESUMO
Objective: We aimed to characterize the course of COVID-19 in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIIRD) patients in Israel, taking into consideration several remarkable aspects, including the outcomes of the different outbreaks, the effect of vaccination campaigns, and AIIRD activity post-recovery. Methods: We established a national registry of AIIRD patients diagnosed with COVID-19, including demographic data, AIIRD diagnosis, duration and systemic involvement, comorbidities, date of COVID-19 diagnosis, clinical course, and dates of vaccinations. COVID-19 was diagnosed by a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction. Results: Israel experienced 4 outbreaks of COVID-19 until 30.11.2021. The first three outbreaks (1.3.2020 - 30.4.2021) comprised 298 AIIRD patients. 64.9% had a mild disease and 24.2% had a severe course; 161 (53.3%) patients were hospitalized, 27 (8.9%) died. The 4th outbreak (delta variant), starting 6 months after the beginning of the vaccination campaign comprised 110 patients. Despite similar demographic and clinical characteristics, a smaller proportion of AIIRD patients had negative outcomes as compared to the first 3 outbreaks, with regards to severity (16 patients,14.5%), hospitalization (29 patients, 26.4%) and death (7 patients, 6.4%). COVID-19 did not seem to influence the AIIRD activity 1-3 months post-recovery. Conclusions: COVID-19 is more severe and has an increased mortality in active AIIRD patients with systemic involvement, older age and comorbidities. Vaccination with 3 doses of the mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 protected from severe COVID-19, hospitalization and death during the 4th outbreak. The pattern of spread of COVID-19 in AIIRD patients was similar to the general population.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Reumáticas , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Israel/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Background: Late hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to the BNT162b2-vaccine have raised concerns regarding its safety, particularly as further immunizations are required. The yield of skin testing with the BNT162b2v is unclear, as well as the risk factors and outcomes of re-immunization after late HSRs. Objective: We studied a series of patients with late HSRs to BNT162b2v. Methods: Patients referred to the Sheba medical center from December 2020 to May 2021 with late HSRs to the first dose of BNT162b2 were included. HSRs were defined as late if they appeared or lasted >24 h after inoculation. We compared late HSRs to immediate HSRs that appeared within minutes−2 h after vaccination. Intradermal testing with PEG-containing medication and BNT162b2v was performed. Results: A total of 17 patients that presented with late HSRs (study group) were compared to 34 patients with immediate HSRs (control group). Delayed sensitivity to intradermal testing of the BNT162b2v was observed in 9/17 (53%) of the study group compared to 4/34 (12%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Former exposure to a dermal filler with hyaluronic acid was documented among 7/17 (41%) vs. 2/34 (6%) in the study and control groups, respectively, (p = 0.0038). All patients who presented with late HSRs were advised to receive subsequent doses of the BNT162b2v vaccine with or without concomitant medication, and all were re-immunized successfully. Conclusions: Late HSRs to BNT162b2v were linked with positive responses to intradermal testing with the vaccine and prior exposure to derma fillers with hyaluronic acid. This may elude to an immune mechanism triggered by former exposures. Although further studies are needed, late HSRs to the BNT162b2-vaccine did not prevent patients from receiving subsequent doses of the vaccines.
RESUMO
Background: Sesame allergy (SA) is a common cause of life-threatening, persistent food allergy, not only in the Middle East and Asia, but increasingly worldwide. Commercially available tests such as extracts for skin testing or specific IgE for sesame or its components in serum, have very limited predictive values. Therefore the diagnosis is dependent on the performance of oral food challenges (OFC), frequently avoided in children, due to time and resource constraints, as well as the risk of anaphylaxis. In the current study we aimed to develop a simple, readily available, clinical tool, able to predict sesame OFC outcomes in children. Methods: Children with a history of SA were evaluated in the outpatient allergy clinic. All children underwent natural sesame OFC, with an additional baked-sesame challenge offered to children with SA. Clinical data were compared between the sesame tolerant (ST) and SA groups. Machine-learning tools were applied, to create a simple, clinically driven, decision tree analysis (DTA), predicting the outcome of sesame OFCs and the diagnosis of SA. Results: One hundred four children, mean age 47.2 months, 58% boys were included, with a high prevalence of additional food allergies, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and rhinitis. Following OFC, 56 (54%) were diagnosed as ST and 48 (46%) SA. Among SA children, 85% were able to consume baked-sesame in equal or higher protein amounts compared to natural sesame paste. Compared to ST, SA children had a tendency towards a higher incidence of allergic rhinitis (5% Vs 17%, p = 0.062), multiple food allergies (3.6% vs 12.5%, p = 0.09) and requiring medical treatment after the initial SA reaction (27% vs 41%, p = 0.022). As a group, skin tests with both commercial and natural tahini paste differed significantly between ST and SA (mean wheal in mm, for extract 4.2 vs 13.4, p < 0.001 and for natural sesame paste 6.7 vs 24.4, p < 0.001), However, the PPV of any individual test was only between 60%-85%. Our exploratory, clinical DTA, predicted OFC outcomes and the presence or absence of Sesame Allergy, with ≥96% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values. Conclusion: OFCs remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of Sesame Allergy and are indicated to define ST/SA status even in highly atopic patients with previous immediate allergic reactions to sesame. A decision-tree analysis based on clinical parameters easily available in every allergy clinic, can predict the outcome of sesame OFC in the vast majority of children, increasing the safety and availability of such diagnostic procedures.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the success of multidisciplinary thyroid eye disease (TED) clinic. OBJECTIVES: To present the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients treated in a multidisciplinary TED clinic. METHODS: A medical record review of all patients who attended a TED clinic was performed. Data included demographics, medical history, laboratory tests, visual function tests, ocular examinations, clinical activity score (CAS), and assessment of quality-of-life (QOL). RESULTS: Clinic visits included 132 patients seen during 385 appointments at a TED clinic (mean 12 appointments per patient). Management of TED included medical treatments for 48 patients (36.3%) and surgical treatment for 56 (42.4%). There was a positive significant correlation between the CAS and thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) activity at the first visit and at the last follow-up visit (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). However, no correlation was found between the CAS and the thyroid-stimulating hormone levels or between the free triiodothyronine (fT3) and fT4 levels at the first or last visit. There was a significant negative correlation between the CAS and color vision (-0.347, P < 0.01, Pearson correlation) at the first visit, but not between the CAS and visual acuity and visual field at either the first or last visit. Changes in the QOL and the CAS scores were significantly negatively correlated (-0.240, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment and management decisions for TED should be based on multiple parameters including clinical examinations by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists, laboratory tests, and CAS and QOL scores.
Assuntos
Oftalmopatia de Graves , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Oftalmopatia de Graves/terapia , Testes de Função Tireóidea , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
Objectives: The BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine has been found to be highly effective in preventing COVID-19 but is associated with increased reactogenicity. We aimed to examine the correlation between immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Methods: Subjects without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection that participated in active surveillance after being vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine were included. Study participants reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) through questionnaires administered by text message after receiving each dose of the vaccine. A reactogenicity score was developed based on the type and duration of ADRs. In addition, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) levels and neutralization assays were performed 7−21 and 7−38 days after the first and second vaccine doses, respectively. Associations between ADRs and antibody levels were assessed by Spearman correlations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with ADRs. Results: A total of 831 health care workers were included. The mean age was 46.5 years (SD = 11.8) and 75.5% were females. 83.4% and 83.3% had at least one local ADR after the first and second doses, respectively. 33% and 83.2% had at least one systemic ADR after the first and second doses, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found a significant correlation between ADR score and anti-RBD-IgG titers (r = 0.366; p < 0.0001) after adjustment for age, gender, and days after the second vaccination. High anti-RBD-IgG levels, being younger than 55 and being female, were all correlated with increased rates of ADRs. Conclusion: BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reactogenicity appears to be correlated with higher post-vaccination antibody levels and is independently associated with younger age and female gender.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have raised concerns, particularly as repeated doses are required. Skin tests with the vaccines excipient were found to be of low value, whereas the utility of skin tests with the whole vaccine is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a panel of skin tests and the outcomes of subsequent doses of immunization among subjects who suffered an immediate allergic reaction to the BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: Between March and December 2021, patients who experienced symptoms consistent with immediate allergic reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine and were referred to the Sheba Medical Center underwent skin testing with polyethylene glyol (PEG)-containing medicines, Pfizer-BNT162b2, and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (AZD1222). Further immunization was performed accordingly and under medical observation. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients underwent skin testing for suspected allergy to the COVID vaccines, of which 38 of 51 (74.5%) were nonreactive, 7 of 51(13.7%) had no skin sensitization but suffered a clinical reaction during skin testing (mainly cough), and 6 of 51 (11.7%) exhibited immediate skin sensitization. Both skin sensitization and cough during testing were related to a higher use of adrenaline following immunization (P = .08 and P = .024, respectively). Further immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine was recommended unless sensitization or severe reaction to previous immunization was evident. The latter were referred to be tested/receive the alternative AZD1222 vaccine. Ten patients underwent skin testing with AZD1222: 2 of 10 (20%) demonstrated skin sensitization to both vaccines; thus, 8 of 10 were immunized with the AZD1222, of which 2 of 8 (25%) had allergic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines are rare but can be severe and reoccur. Intradermal testing with the whole vaccine may discriminate sensitized subjects, detect cross-sensitization between vaccines, and enable estimation of patients at higher risk.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidade Imediata , Hipersensibilidade , Vacinas , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Tosse , Epinefrina , Excipientes , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Imunização , Vacinas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Macrophage activation syndrome is the most frequent life-threatening complication of adult-onset Still's disease. This is a nearly fatal case of a young patient, which has been refractory to corticoste- roids, anakinra, tocilizumab, cyclosporine A, and etoposide, but eventually responded miraculously to salvage therapy with ruxolitinib. We review recent pertinent data related to the therapeutic value of ruxolitinib for macrophage activation syndrome triggered by adult-onset Still's disease.