RESUMO
Among the phencyclidine (PCP) and synthetic cathinone analogs present on the street market, 3-methoxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP) is one of the most popular dissociative hallucinogen drugs, while 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC) is a commonly encountered psychostimulant. Numerous 3-MeO-PCP- and 3-MMC-related intoxication cases have been reported worldwide. Identification of the positional isomers of MeO-PCP and MMC families are particularly challenging for clinical and forensic laboratories; this is mostly due to their difficult chromatographic separation (particularly when using liquid chromatography-LC) and similar mass spectrometric behaviors. 3-MeO-PCP and 3-MMC were identified in two powders, detained by two subjects and seized by the police, by different analytical techniques, including liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate-mass Orbitrap mass spectrometry (LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS), and solid deposition gas chromatography-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (sd-GC-FTIR). LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS allowed us to assign the elemental formulae C18H27NO (MeO-PCP) and C11H15NO (MMC) through accurate mass measurement of the two MH+ ions, and the comparison of experimental and calculated MH+ isotopic patterns. However, MH+ collision-induced product ions spectra were not conclusive in discriminating between the positional isomers [(3-MeO-PCP vs. 4-MeO-PCP) and (3-MMC vs. 4-MMC and 2-MMC)]. Likewise, sd-GC-FTIR easily allowed us to differentiate between the MeO-PCP and MMC positional isomers unambiguously, confirming the presence of 3-MeO-PCP and 3-MMC, due to the high-quality match factor of the experimental FTIR spectra against the target FTIR spectra of MeO-PCP and MMC isomers in a dedicated library. 3-MeO-PCP (in contrast to 3-MMC) was also detected in blood and urine samples of both subjects and analyzed in the context of routine forensic casework by LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS following a simple deproteinization step. In addition, this untargeted approach allowed us to detect dozens of phase I and phase II 3-MeO-PCP metabolites in all biological specimens. Analysis of the extracted samples by sd-GC-FTIR revealed the presence of 3-MeO-PCP, thus confirming the intake of such specific methoxy-PCP isomer in both cases. These results highlight the effectiveness of LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS and sd-GC-FTIR data in attaining full structural characterization of the psychoactive drugs, even in absence of reference standards, in both non-biological and biological specimens.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Postoperative limb compression is widely used after venous surgery to prevent thromboembolism and to reduce hemorrhage, edema, hematoma, and pain. Only limited studies have been published regarding the most adequate postoperative compression therapy after varicose vein surgery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a new stocking kit used for postoperative limb compression. METHODS: The study compared the clinical practicability, ease to use, effectiveness, and safety of a postoperative stocking system (23 to 32 mmHg at the ankle) with compression bandages (control group). This prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial, was performed in three Italian centers specializing in venous surgery. Sixty consecutive patients (classification CEAP C2,(S)) underwent unilateral varicose vein surgery at one of the three centers. After surgery, patients were randomized for postoperative compression therapy with a new stocking system (Sigvaris Postoperative Kit; Ganzoni Sigvaris Corp, Winterthur, Switzerland) or standard stretch bandages (30 patients per group). Primary end points were incidence of venous thromboembolism, hemorrhage, limb hematoma, or edema. RESULTS: No episodes of venous thromboembolism were observed. The mean area of thigh hematoma on postoperative days 7 and 14 was 75.70 cm² and 2.93 cm², respectively, for the stocking group, and 92.97 cm² and 5.42 cm² for the bandage group (not significant). On postoperative day 7, edema was found in 50% of the patients wearing bandages and in 20% of the patients wearing the stocking kit, which was a significant reduction. No statistical difference was recorded for postoperative pain; however, better patient acceptance and quality of life after the operation were recorded in the stocking group. CONCLUSION: Patients can be effectively treated with the Sigvaris Postoperative Kit. Patients treated with stockings have less edema compared with standard bandaging, and the application of the stocking kit improves patient quality of life and compliance with postoperative compression therapy.
