INFLA-score: A new diagnostic paradigm to identify pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pericarditis may be challenging because not all patients meet the conventional criteria. An overlooked diagnosis implies a longer course of symptoms and an increased risk of recurrences. C-reactive protein (CRP), widely used as an inflammation marker, has some limitations. This study aimed to assess the usefulness and prognostic value of INFLA-score, a validated index assessing low-grade inflammation, in the definite diagnosis of pericarditis. METHODS: Patients with suspected pericarditis were included. The INFLA-score was computed based on white blood cells and platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and CRP, ranging from -16 to +16. An INFLA-score > 0 was considered positive for the presence of pericardial inflammation. The primary end point was the association of INFLA-score with diagnosis of pericarditis according to conventional criteria. The recurrence of pericarditis at 6 months was the secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included, aged 47 ± 17 years, and 57% were females. Among 72 (36%) patients with a diagnosis of pericarditis, an INFLA-score > 0 was observed in 86% (vs. 36%, p < 0.001), abnormal CRP in 42% (vs. 10%, p < 0.001), pericardial effusion in 44% (vs. 19%, p < 0.001), abnormal electrocardiogram in 56% (vs. 24%, p < 0.001), and rubs in 5% (vs. 0.1%, p = 0.072). INFLA-score > 0 had the strongest predictive value for the diagnosis of pericarditis (hazard ratio 8.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.39-21.21), with 86% sensitivity and 64% specificity, as opposed to CRP (hazard ratio 1.72, non-significant 95% CI 0.69-4.29). Recurrent pericarditis at 6 months was more frequent in patients with a positive INFLA-score (37% vs. 8%, p < 0.001, rate ratio 4.15, 95% CI 2.81-6.12). In patients with normal CRP, INFLA-score-confirmed ongoing inflammation in 78% of the cases. Compared with the conventional criteria, the INFLA-score had the highest accuracy (area under the curve = 0.82). Different cutoffs were valuable to rule out (INFLA-score > 0, sensitivity 86%, and negative likelihood ratio 0.22) or rule in (INFLA-score ≥ 10, specificity 97%, and positive likelihood ratio 13) the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The INFLA-score is a useful diagnostic tool to assess the probability of pericarditis, with a strong prognostic value for further recurrences, outperforming CRP.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of the electrocardiogram in patients with pericarditis.

OBJECTIVE: The ECG has been traditionally used to support the diagnosis of pericarditis. However, the pericardium is electrically silent and ECG changes may imply concurrent myocardial involvement rather than simple pericarditis. The aim of the present paper is to analyse the frequency, type and clinical implication of ECG changes in patients with pericarditis compared with those with myocarditis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with pericarditis and/or myocarditis were included in a prospective cohort study from January 2017 to December 2020. A clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6 months and then every 6 months. Cardiac magnetic resonance was used to diagnose concurrent myocarditis. RESULTS: 166 patients (median age 47 years, 95% CI 44 to 51) with 66 men (39.8%) were included: 110 cases with pericarditis (mean age 47.7 years, 29.1% male) and 56 cases with myocarditis (mean age 44.8, 60.7% male). ECG changes were reported in 61 of 166 (36.7%) patients: 27 of 110 (24.5%) among those with pericarditis and 34 of 56 (60.7%) among those with myocarditis (p<0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ECG changes were associated with troponin elevation (risk ratio 1.97; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.43), suggesting myocardial involvement. ECG changes were not associated with increased risk of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: ECG changes, mainly widespread ST-segment elevation, can be recorded in about one-quarter of patients with pericarditis, and were not associated with a worse prognosis. These changes may reflect concurrent myocarditis that should be ruled out.

Usefulness of Beta-Blockers to Control Symptoms in Patients With Pericarditis.

Exercise restriction is a nonpharmacological treatment of pericarditis that could reduce symptoms by slowing heart rate (HR). Beta-blockers allow pharmacological control of HR. Aim of this paper is to explore the possible efficacy of beta-blockers to improve control of symptoms in patients with pericarditis. We analyzed consecutive cases with pericarditis referred to our center. Beta-blockers were prescribed on top of standard anti-inflammatory therapy in symptomatic patients (chest pain and palpitations) with rest HR>75 beats/min. The primary end point was the persistence of pericardial pain at 3 weeks. The secondary end point was the occurrence of recurrent pericarditis at 18 months. Propensity score matching was used to generate 2 cohorts of 101 patients with and without beta-blockers with balanced baseline features. A clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 3 weeks, 1, 3, 6 months and then every 12 months. A total of 347 patients (mean age 53 years, 58% females, 48% with a recurrence, 81% with idiopathic/viral etiology) were included. Among them, 128 patients (36.9%) were treated with beta-blockers. Peak C-reactive protein values were correlated with heart rate on first observation (r=0.48, p<0.001). Using propensity-score matched cohorts, patients treated with beta-blockers had a lower frequency of symptoms persistence at 3 weeks (respectively 4% vs. 14%; p = 0.024) and a trend towards a reduction of recurrences at 18 months (p = 0.069). In conclusion the use of beta-blockers on top of standard anti-inflammatory therapies was associated with improved symptom control.