Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 311, 2023 Oct 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37833715

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature. METHODS: A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Fissura Anal , Humanos , Fissura Anal/diagnóstico , Fissura Anal/cirurgia , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Colo , Doença Crônica , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 406(5): 1591-1598, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538872

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In the attempt to understand the reasons for and to find a solution to the high recurrence rate after perineal surgery for complete rectal prolapse, we retrospectively analysed the long-term results of Altemeier's procedure alone, or associated with Trans-Obturator Colonic Suspension (TOCS) in a large series of patients with a median interval of 84 months (range 6-258). METHODS: Medical records of 110 patients undergoing Altemeier with levatorplasty (group 1) and 20 patients submitted to the same procedure associated with TOCS (group 2) for newly diagnosed complete rectal prolapse were reviewed. All patients had been recruited after preoperative clinical examination, SF-36 quality of life, continence score and colonoscopy. RESULTS: Mortality was nil. The overall complication and the recurrence rates were 12.3%, and 15.0% (P= 0.769) and 24.6% and 5.0% (P=0.067) in group 1 and 2, respectively. Twelve patients of group 1 with a recurrence were submitted to a redo-Altemeier, 8 to a redo-Altemeier associated with TOCS, and 6 associated with an anterior coloplasty with a mesh. The only patient of group 2 with a recurrence was submitted to a Hartmann's operation. Preoperative vs postoperative mean (SD) continence score was 15.8 (3.1) and 15.6 (3.3) versus 4.1 (1.8) and 3.9 (1.9) in group 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). All parameters of SF-36 improved after surgery (P<0.01) and no differences between the 2 groups were found CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results confirmed the safety and effectiveness of Altemeier's procedure for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse, with the limit of a non-negligible incidence of anastomotic complications and recurrences. The combination of Altemeier with TOCS showed a positive trend to a reduction of the recurrence rate, not worsening morbidity and outcomes.


Assuntos
Prolapso Retal , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 27(1): 28-33, 2021 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30946283

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a new single laparoscopic operation devised to relieve obstructed defecation, gynecologic and urinary symptoms in a large series of female patients with multiorgan pelvic prolapse. METHODS: We submitted 384 female patients to laparoscopic pelvic organ prolapse suspension operation, a new technique based on suspension of the middle pelvic compartment, by using a polypropylene mesh and followed up 368 of them, with defecography performed 12 months after surgery and a standardized protocol. RESULTS: The 368 patients were followed-up for 36.3 (±4.4) months, Recurrence rate was 4.9% for obstructed defecation syndrome and 3.3% for stress urinary incontinence. Complication rate was 2.9%. The mean period of daily activity resumption was 16.3 days (±4.8 days). Anorectal and urogynecologic symptoms and scores significantly improved after the operation (P < 0.001), with no worsening of anal continence. Incidence of postoperative fecal urgency was 0%. Postoperative defecography showed a significant (P < 0.001) improvement of all parameters in 315 patients (82%). Short Form 36 Health Survey score significantly improved after the operation (P < 0.01). An excellent/good overall Satisfaction Index was reported by 78.0% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the Laparoscopic-Pelvic Organ Prolapse Suspension seems to be safe and effective as a 1-stage treatment of associated pelvic floor diseases. Randomized studies with an appropriate control group and longer follow-up are now needed to assess the effectiveness of this promising technique.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Constipação Intestinal/cirurgia , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/etiologia , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Urológicas/etiologia , Doenças Urológicas/cirurgia
4.
Am J Surg ; 216(5): 893-899, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29499859

RESUMO

A randomized study was carried out to compare the mid-term outcome of transanal rectal resection with the CCS-30 TRANSTAR and two TST36 staplers in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome. After selection, patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups:104 underwent a TRANSTAR operation and 104 a transanal rectal resection with two TST36 staplers. Patients were followed up with clinical examination, and defecography. Cumulative complication rate was significantly higher in TRANSTAR operation (P = 0.019). All symptoms and defecographic parameters significantly improved (P < 0.001), without differences. Costs were significantly lower with double TST (P = 0.035). Recurrence rates were 6.2% in TRANSTAR group and 11.4% with double TST (P = 0.206). Two circular TST 36 staplers consent to obtain the same clinical and functional results than the CCS-30, with significantly lower complication rate and costs.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/cirurgia , Defecação/fisiologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Colonoscopia , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Constipação Intestinal/fisiopatologia , Defecografia , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA