Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Metformin: AME-MET Study - A Multicentric Real-world Study in Italy.

AIMS: Metformin is the most widely used drug for the first-line treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but its use and schedule have been poorly investigated in elderly patients. METHODS: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicentric study on metformin in T2DM outpatients older than 65 years who were taking the drug for at least 6 months and referred to Italian Endocrinology and Diabetology Services. The primary endpoint was daily metformin dose, and secondary endpoints were the correlations between metformin dose and age, comorbidities, and concomitant use of other drugs. The study was open to all members of AME (Associazione Medici Endocrinologi). RESULTS: Fifteen Italian centers recruited 751 consecutive participants (42.9% older than 75 years, 48.6% females). T2DM duration was 12.9 ± 9.7 years (longer than 10 years in 53.8%). Metformin had been used for 10.3 ± 6.8 years (longer than 10 years in 52.4%). Metformin dose was 1.6 ± 0.9 g/day (>1.5 g/day in 63.4%). As compared to the youngest, participants older than 75 years did not differ for metformin daily dose or number of administrations. Metformin dose was significantly directly correlated to eGFR, diabetes duration, and metformin treatment duration. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, the minimum daily effective dose of metformin was prescribed in more than half of older T2DM outpatients.

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus in Extrapancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, an oral mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, is currently approved for the treatment of progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although promising, only scattered data, often from nondedicated studies, are available for extrapancreatic NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the published data was performed concerning the use of everolimus in extrapancreatic NET, with the aim of summarizing the current knowledge on its efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, the usefulness of everolimus was evaluated according to the different sites of the primary. RESULTS: The present study included 22 different publications, including 874 patients and 456 extrapancreatic NETs treated with everolimus. Nine different primary sites of extrapancreatic NETs were found. The median progression-free survival ranged from 12.0 to 29.9 months. The median time to progression was not reached in a phase II prospective study, and the interval to progression ranged from 12 to 36 months in 5 clinical cases. Objective responses were observed in 7 prospective studies, 2 retrospective studies, and 2 case reports. Stabilization of the disease was obtained in a high rate of patients, ranging from 67.4% to 100%. The toxicity of everolimus in extrapancreatic NETs is consistent with the known safety profile of the drug. Most adverse events were either grade 1 or 2 and easy manageable with a dose reduction or temporary interruption and only rarely requiring discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Treatment with everolimus in patients with extrapancreatic NETs appears to be a promising strategy that is safe and well tolerated. The use of this emerging opportunity needs to be validated with clinical trials specifically designed on this topic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The present study reviewed all the available published data concerning the use of everolimus in 456 extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and summarized the current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of this drug, not yet approved except for pancreatic NETs. The progression-free survival rates and some objective responses seem promising and support the extension of the use of this drug. The site-by-site analysis seems to suggest that some subtypes of NETs, such as colorectal, could be more sensitive to everolimus than other primary NETs. No severe adverse events were usually reported and discontinuation was rarely required; thus, everolimus should be considered a valid therapeutic option for extrapancreatic NETs.

Levothyroxine liquid solution versus tablet for replacement treatment in hypothyroid patients.

BACKGROUND: Although replacement treatment with L-thyroxine (LT4) seems easy to manage, about one-third of hypothyroid patients show thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) values outside the normal range. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether LT4 liquid formulation (monodose vials or drops) affects TSH stability values and to assess its ability to maintain TSH within the normal range compared to tablets. METHODS: A total of 100 hypothyroid patients on replacement treatment with LT4 liquid solution were enrolled (Liquid Group) at a follow-up visit (revisit). The inclusion criteria were 1) treatment for surgical hypothyroidism for at least 2 years or autoimmune hypothyroidism for at least 5 years, 2) normal TSH at the previous visit 12 months before enrollment (baseline visit), and 3) maintenance of the same LT4 dosage during the time interval between the baseline and the follow-up visit. Using the same selection process, we also enrolled 100 hypothyroid patients on replacement treatment with LT4 tablets (Tablet Group). RESULTS: At the follow-up visit, 19 patients of the Tablet Group and 8 patients of the Liquid Group had abnormal TSH values (P = .023). Weekly and daily LT4 dosage per kilogram were higher in Tablet Group (P = .016 and .006, respectively). The magnitude of TSH change from baseline to follow-up visit was greater in the Tablet Group (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The use of LT4 liquid formulation compared to tablet resulted in a significantly higher number of hypothyroid patients who maintained the euthyroid state in a 12-month follow-up period and a reduced variability in TSH values.