Son Preference among Infertile Couples at the Fertility Clinic of Two Tertiary Hospitals in Enugu, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Son preference is known to be prevalent in developing countries and has dire consequences for the family, particularly girls and women. It is speculated that the prevalence of son preference may be high among fertility clinic attendees, and that son preference may be the reason for seeking fertility care in Nigeria. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and risk factors for son preference among fertility seekers in Enugu, Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of fertility clinic attendees from the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla Enugu and the Pink Petals Fertility Clinic Enugu from April 1 to September 30, 2023. Eligible and consenting participants were interviewed. Data collection was with a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire, which contained three sections: biodata, obstetrics and gynecological data and 3-point son preference questions. The proportion of those who scored 3 (son preference) was documented. The analysis was both descriptive and inferential using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0 Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp. RESULTS: Of the 422 participants interviewed, 416 (98.6%) completed the study with a nonresponse rate of 6 (1.4%). The overall prevalence of son preference was 10.1% (42/416) and all 42 (10.1%) were in the clinic to have a male baby. The risk factors for son preference were less than tertiary education (P < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 6.46, confidence interval [CI] 2.79-14.98) and family pressure to have a male baby (P = 0.03, AOR = 3.41, CI 1.72-7.13). CONCLUSIONS: One in 10 couples who attend an infertility clinic in Enugu, Nigeria, has a preference for son, and having a male child is the sole purpose of such a visit. Being under family pressure and not having tertiary education were the predictive risk factors for son preference in the study population.

Résumé Contexte:La préférence pour les garçons est connue pour être répandue dans les pays en développement et a des conséquences désastreuses sur la famille, en particulier sur les filles. et les femmes. On suppose que la prévalence de la préférence pour les garçons pourrait être élevée parmi les prestataires des cliniques de fertilité, et que la préférence pour les garçons pourrait être élevée. être la raison pour laquelle vous recherchez des soins de fertilité au Nigeria.Objectifs:Déterminer la prévalence et les facteurs de risque de préférence pour les garçons parmi les facteurs de fécondité. chercheurs à Enugu, au Nigeria.Matériels et méthodes:Étude transversale basée sur un questionnaire auprès de participantes aux cliniques de fertilité de l'Université de l'hôpital universitaire du Nigeria Ituku Ozalla Enugu et de la clinique de fertilité Pink Petals Enugu du 1er avril au 30 septembre 2023. Éligible et les participants consentants ont été interrogés. La collecte des données s'est faite à l'aide d'un questionnaire pré-testé administré par l'intervieweur, qui contenait trois sections: données biologiques, données obstétricales et gynécologiques et questions de préférence pour les fils en 3 points. La proportion de ceux qui ont obtenu un score de 3 (fils préférence) a été documentée. L'analyse était à la fois descriptive et inférentielle à l'aide des statistiques IBM SPSS pour Windows, version 22.0 Armonk, NY, États-Unis: IBM Corp.Résultats:Sur les 422 participants interrogés, 416 (98.6 %) ont terminé l'étude avec un taux de non-réponse de 6 (1.4 %). La prévalence globale de la préférence pour les garçons était de 10.1 % (42/416) et les 42 (10.1 %) étaient toutes à la clinique pour avoir un bébé de sexe masculin. Les facteurs de risque pour la préférence pour les garçons étaient inférieures à l'enseignement supérieur ( P < 0.001, rapport de cotes ajusté [AOR] = 6.46, intervalle de confiance [CI] 2.79­14.98) et pression familiale pour avoir un bébé de sexe masculin ( P = 0.03, AOR = 3.41, CI 1.72­7.13).Conclusions:un couple sur 10 qui fréquente une clinique d'infertilité à Enugu, au Nigeria, a une préférence pour les fils, et avoir un enfant de sexe masculin est le seul objectif d'une telle visite. Être sous la pression familiale et non avoir fait des études supérieures était le facteur de risque prédictif de la préférence pour les garçons dans la population étudiée.

The impact of COVID-19 on the birth rate in Nigeria: a report from population-based registries.

Background and objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that has become a major source of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting the physical and mental health of individuals influencing reproduction. Despite the threat, it poses to maternal health in sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria, there is little or no data on the impact it has on fertility, conception, gestation and birth. To compare the birth rate between pre-COVID and COVID times using selected months of the year. Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of cross-sectional analytical study data from the birth registries of three tertiary hospitals, comparing two years [2019 (Pre-COVID)] versus [2020 (COVID era)] using three months of the year (October to December). The data relied upon was obtained from birth registries in three busy maternity clinics all within tertiary hospitals in South-East Nigeria and we aimed at discussing the potential impacts of COVID-19 on fertility in Nigeria. The secondary outcome measures were; mode of delivery, booking status of the participants, maternal age and occupation. Results: There was a significant decrease in tertiary-hospital based birth rate by 92 births (P = 0.0009; 95% CI: -16.0519 to -4.1481) among mothers in all the three hospitals in 2020 during the COVID period (post lockdown months) of October to December. There was a significant difference in the mode of delivery for mothers (P = 0.0096) with a 95% confidence interval of 1.0664 to 1.5916, as more gave birth through vaginal delivery during the 2020 COVID-19 period than pre-COVID-19. Conclusion: Tertiary-hospital based birth rates were reduced during the pandemic. Our multi-centre study extrapolated on possible factors that may have played a role in this decline in their birth rate, which includes but is not limited to; decreased access to hospital care due to the total lockdowns/curfews and worsening inflation and economic recession in the country.

Cesarean section rate and outcomes during and before the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess how the current COVID-19 pandemic has affected cesarean section (C-section) rates, indications, and peripartum outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that compared a 3-month rates of and indications for C-sections at three tertiary health care institutions in Nigeria before (October 2019-December 2019) and during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-May 2020). Primary outcomes were C-section rate and indications between the two periods. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 IBM Corporation. Rates and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to quantify indications and peripartum outcomes and statistical significance was accepted when p value was <0.05. Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. The C-section rate during the COVID-19 period was significantly less than the period prior to the pandemic (237/580, 40.0% vs 390/833, 46.8%; p = 0.027). The rates of postdatism (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-2.05, p = 0.022), fetal distress (odds ratio = 3.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.55-6.06, p = 0.017), emergency C-section (odds ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-2.05, p = 0.042), and anemia (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-3.03, p = 0.016) were significantly higher during the pandemic than prepandemic. Conclusion: The overall C-section rate during the first wave of COVID-19 was significantly lower than the prepandemic period. There were higher rates of postdatism, fetal distress, emergency C-section, and postpartum anemia. Further studies on this changing C-section trend during the pandemic are needed.

An overview of vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women

Menopause and the climacteric period are associated with adverse risk factors for the development of vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction. Sexual dysfunction is a common problem in postmenopausal women; often underdiagnosed; inadequately treated; frequently overlooked; and most often impairing the quality of life of these women. To provide clinicians with current information on vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. This study is a literature review on vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Relevant publications were identified through a search of PubMed and Medline; selected references; journals; and textbooks on this topic; and were included in the review. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction increases with age. It is a common multidimensional problem for postmenopausal women that alter the physiological; biochemical; psychological; and sociocultural environment of a woman. Menopause-related sexual dysfunction may not be reversible without therapy. Estrogen therapy is the most effective option and is the current standard of care for vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Sexual dysfunction is a common multidimensional problem for postmenopausal women and often impairs the quality of life of these women. Estrogen preparations are the most effective treatment. Selective estrogen receptor modulators; vaginal dehydroepiandrostenedione; vaginal testosterone; and tissue-selective estrogen complexes are promising therapies; but further studies are required to confirm their role; efficacy; and safety