An algorithm based on immunotherapy discontinuation and liver biopsy spares corticosteroids in two thirds of cases of severe checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury.

BACKGROUND: There are few data on corticosteroids (CS)-sparing strategies for checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced liver injury (ChILI). AIM: We aimed to assess the performance of a 2-step algorithm for severe ChILI, based on ICI temporary discontinuation (step-1) and, if lack of biochemical improvement, CS based on the degree of necroinflammation at biopsy (step-2). METHODS: Prospective study that included all subjects with grade 3/4 ChILI. Peripheral extended immunophenotyping was performed. Indication for CS: severe necroinflammation; mild or moderate necroinflammation with later biochemical worsening. RESULTS: From 111 subjects with increased transaminases (January 2020 to August 2023), 44 were diagnosed with grade 3 (N = 35) or grade 4 (N = 9) ChILI. Main reason for exclusion was alternative diagnosis. Lung cancer (13) and melanoma (12) were the most common malignancies. ICI: 23(52.3%) anti-PD1, 8(18.2%) anti-PD-L1, 3(6.8%) anti-CTLA-4, 10(22.7%) combined ICI. Liver injury pattern: hepatocellular (23,52.3%) mixed (12,27.3%) and cholestatic (9,20.5%). 14(32%) presented bilirubin >1.2 mg/dL. Overall, 30(68.2%) patients did not require CS: 22(50.0%) due to ICI discontinuation (step-1) and 8/22 (36.4%) based on the degree of necroinflammation (step-2). Biopsy mainly impacted on grade 3 ChILI, sparing CS in 8 out of 15 (53.3%) non-improvement patients after ICI discontinuation. CD8+ HLA-DR expression (p = 0.028), central memory (p = 0.046) were lower in CS-free managed subjects, but effector-memory cells (p = 0.002) were higher. Time to transaminases normalisation was shorter in those CS-free managed (overall: p < 0.001, grade 3: p < 0.001). Considering our results, a strategy based on ICI discontinuation and biopsy for grade 3 ChILI is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm based on temporary immunotherapy discontinuation and biopsy allows CS avoidance in two thirds of cases of severe ChILI.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and recent chemotherapy on COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis from the OnCovid registry.

Background: To date, limited evidence exists on the impact of COVID-19 in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), nor about the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and recent chemotherapy on COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in this specific population. Methods: We described COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with STS across 'Omicron' (15 December 2021-31 January 2022), 'Pre-vaccination' (27 February 2020-30 November 2020), and 'Alpha-Delta' phase (01 December 2020-14 December 2021) using OnCovid registry participants (NCT04393974). Case fatality rate at 28 days (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were also described according to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status, while the impact of the receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy within 4 weeks prior to COVID-19 on clinical outcomes was assessed with Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) models adjusted for possible confounders. Results: Out of 3820 patients, 97 patients with STS were included. The median age at COVID-19 diagnosis was 56 years (range: 18-92), with 65 patients (67%) aged < 65 years and most patients had a low comorbidity burden (65, 67.0%). The most frequent primary tumor sites were the abdomen (56.7%) and the gynecological tract (12.4%). In total, 36 (37.1%) patients were on cytotoxic chemotherapy within 4 weeks prior to COVID-19. The overall CFR28 was 25.8%, with 38% oxygen therapy requirement, 34% rate of complications, and 32.3% of hospitalizations due to COVID-19. CFR28 (29.5%, 21.4%, and 12.5%) and all indicators of COVID-19 severity demonstrated a trend toward a numerical improvement across the pandemic phases. Similarly, vaccinated patients demonstrated numerically improved CFR28 (16.7% versus 27.7%) and COVID-19 morbidity compared with unvaccinated patients. Patients who were on chemotherapy experienced comparable CFR28 (19.4% versus 26.0%, p = 0.4803), hospitalizations (50.0% versus 44.4%, p = 0.6883), complication rates (30.6% versus 34.0%, p = 0.7381), and oxygen therapy requirement (28.1% versus 40.0%, p = 0.2755) compared to those who were not on anticancer therapy at COVID-19, findings further confirmed by the IPTW-fitted multivariable analysis. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate an improvement in COVID-19 outcomes in patients with STS over time. Recent exposure to chemotherapy does not impact COVID-19 morbidity and mortality and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination confers protection against adverse outcomes from COVID-19 in this patient population.

An analysis from the OnCovid registry on the impact of chemotherapy and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on clinical outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcoma and COVID-19 Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a group of rare and aggressive tumours, usually treated with high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. To date no clear evidence exists on the impact of COVID-19 in patients with STS, nor on the potential impact of recent chemotherapy and prior SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this specific patient population. This is the 1st study to show COVID-19 outcomes in patients with STS, highlighting a substantial vaccine efficacy with no negative impact of recent chemotherapy on COVID-19 outcomes.

Long-term treatment with nebulized colistin in oncological patients with recurrent respiratory infections

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of long-term treatment with nebulized colistin in reducing the number of respiratory infections, emergency consultations and hospitalizations in oncological patients.MethodsA retrospective, observational, single-centre study including patients with solid or haematologic malignancies, or pulmonary GVHD after HSTC who received treatment with nebulized colistin for at least six-months to prevent recurrent respiratory infections (July 2010 to June 2017).ResultsTwelve patients were included (median age: 54.4, range: 23–85), 7 with solid malignancies and 5 with haematologic malignancies (2 with pulmonary GVHD). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequent microorganism in sputum cultures (11/12 patients), all strains were susceptible to colistin. There was a statistically significant reduction (p=0.01) in respiratory infections in the six-month period after starting colistin (median: 1, range: 0–4) compared to the six-month period before (median: 4, range: 1–8). There was also a reduction in emergency consultations (precolistin: median: 1.50, range: 0–3; postcolistin: median: 0, range: 0–3) and hospitalizations (precolistin: median: 1.50, range: 0–3; postcolistin: median: 0, range: 0–3) due to respiratory infections. No colistin-resistant strains were identified.ConclusionsLong-term treatment with nebulized colistin may be useful to reduce the number of exacerbations in oncological patients with recurrent respiratory infections. (AU)

Objetivos: Evaluar la eficacia de un tratamiento prolongado con colistina nebulizada para reducir el número de infecciones respiratorias, consultas en Urgencias y hospitalizaciones en pacientes oncológicos.MétodosEstudio retrospectivo, observacional y unicéntrico en pacientes con neoplasias sólidas o hematológicas o EICR pulmonar tras TPH tratados con colistina nebulizada al menos 6 meses para prevenir infecciones respiratorias recurrentes (julio del 2010-junio del 2017).ResultadosSe incluyó a 12 pacientes (edad mediana 54,4, rango: 23-85), 7 con cáncer sólido y 5 con neoplasias hematológicas (2 con EICR pulmonar). El microorganismo aislado más frecuentemente en esputos fue Pseudomonasaeruginosa (11/12 pacientes); todas las cepas fueron colistina-sensibles. Se evidenciaron una reducción estadísticamente significativa (p = 0,01) de las infecciones respiratorias en los 6 meses tras iniciar colistina (mediana: 1, rango: 0-4) comparado con los 6 meses previos (mediana: 4, rango: 1-8), y una reducción del número de visitas a Urgencias (precolistina: mediana: 1,50, rango: 0-3; postcolistina: mediana: 0, rango: 0-3) y hospitalizaciones (precolistina: mediana: 1,50, rango: 0-3; postcolistina: mediana: 0, rango: 0-3) por infección respiratoria. No se detectaron cepas resistentes a colistina.ConclusionesUn tratamiento prolongado con colistina nebulizada puede ser útil para reducir el número de exacerbaciones en pacientes oncológicos con infecciones respiratorias recurrentes. (AU)

Riesgo de infección asociada a nuevas terapias para el tratamiento de los síndromes linfoproliferativos / Risk of infection associated with new therapies for lymphoproliferative syndromes

En la última década se han experimentado grandes cambios en los tratamientos de los síndromes linfoproliferativos. A la quimioterapia convencional se suma ahora un amplio abanico de terapias dirigidas con diferentes indicaciones. El objetivo de esta revisión es evaluar el riesgo de infección asociado a estas terapias, así como tratar de establecer unas recomendaciones de prevención. En todos los casos, la enfermedad de base del paciente, así como los tratamientos concomitantes o los recibidos previamente, impactan en el riesgo de infección. Los anticuerpos anti-CD20 (rituximab, ofatumumab y obinutuzumab) se asocian a un mayor riesgo de infección bacteriana, vírica y de reactivación de infecciones latentes, así como a infecciones oportunistas. El alemtuzumab se asocia a inmunosupresión grave y mantenida. El ibrutinib y el acalabrutinib se asocian a infecciones bacterianas, especialmente respiratorias, infección fúngica invasiva e infecciones oportunistas. El idelalisib se asocia a un aumento de la incidencia de neumonía por Pneumocystis jirovecii y reactivación de citomegalovirus. El venetoclax se asocia a infecciones respiratorias y neutropenia. Los inhibidores de checkpoint inmune parecen no incrementar, por sí mismos, el riesgo de infección; sin embargo, el uso de glucocorticoides e inmunosupresores para controlar efectos adversos inmunorrelacionados sí conlleva un aumento del número de infecciones, incluyendo infecciones oportunistas. El brentuximab, la lenalidomida y los inhibidores de la histona deacetilasa no parecen asociarse a un mayor riesgo de infección. Aunque existe poca experiencia en el uso de terapias celulares, se ha observado un mayor número de infecciones en pacientes que han recibido más de 3 tratamientos antineoplásicos previamente, o en aquellos que han requerido tocilizumab o glucocorticoides para el manejo del síndrome de liberación de citocinas. En todos los pacientes se recomienda una actualización del calendario vacunal, cribado de infecciones latentes y profilaxis individualizada

Over the last decade, there have been important developments in the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders. Apart from conventional chemotherapy, a wide array of therapies has been developed, with different indications. The aim of this review is to evaluate the risk of infection associated with these therapies, as well as establishing prevention recommendations. In all cases, the patient's underlying disease as well as concomitant or previous therapies have an impact on the risk of infection. Anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab, ofatumumab and obinutuzumab) have been associated with a higher risk of bacterial and viral infection, as well as reactivation of latent infections and opportunistic infections. Alemtuzumab is associated with severe, protracted immunosuppression. Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib have been linked to bacterial infections (especially respiratory infections), invasive fungal infections and opportunistic infections. Idelalisib carries a higher risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii and infection and cytomegalovirus reactivation. Venetoclax is associated with respiratory infections and neutropenia. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are not directly associated with a higher risk of infection; nevertheless, the use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants to control immune-related adverse events results in an increase of the risk of infection. Brentuximab, lenalidomide and histone deacetylase inhibitors do not seem to be associated with a higher risk of infections. Although data are scarce, a higher number of infections have been observed with cellular therapies, mostly in patients with more than 3 previous antineoplastic treatments or those receiving tocilizumab or corticosteroids for managing the cytokine release syndrome. In all patients, we recommend appropriate vaccination, screening for latent infections, and individualized prophylaxis recommendations

Top-ten infections in onco-hematological patients (2015-2017) / Los mejores artículos de infecciones en el paciente oncohematológico

To choose the most relevant ten papers constitutes a challenge in several ways. We have elaborated this selection based on the papers we find to be most useful and ground-breaking for the clinician faced daily by the infectious problems in onco-hematological patients. The selection has been structured in four parts: bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections and infections related with new drugs in onco-hematological patients

Establecer que artículos son los "los top-ten" es difícil en varios aspectos. Hemos establecido esta selección basándonos en lo que hemos considerado más útil y novedoso en el conocimiento de la patología infecciosa en el paciente oncohematológico. Hemos estructurado la selección de los mismos en cuatro apartados: infección bacteriana, infección vírica, infección fúngica e infecciones relacionadas con los nuevos tratamientos en pacientes oncohematológicos

Neumonía necrosante por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina adquirida en la comunidad / Necrotizing pneumonia caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

No disponible