[Effects of D-tagatose, Stevia and Sucrose on pH and oral bacterial activity in dentistry students. A randomized controlled trial]. / Efectos de D-tagatosa, estevia y sacarosa sobre el pH y la actividad bacteriana oral en estudiantes de odontología. Ensayo controlado y aleatorizado.

BACKGROUND: stevia and D-tagatose have shown a reduction in total calorie and carbohydrate intake as a substitute for sucrose, demonstrating a stabilizing effect on pH and bacterial proliferation. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effect of D-tagatose, stevia and sucrose on salivary pH and bacterial activity in odontology students. METHODOLOGY: a controlled study of parallel and randomized groups with a single blind, whose sample considered three groups subjected to a mouthwash of D-tagatose (n = 10), stevia (n = 10) and sucrose (n = 10). These solutions were administered over 1 minute in a single 6.4 % concentrated dose. Data collection and analysis considered the recording of salivary pH 5 min before exposure to the sweetener, immediately after expulsion of the mouthwash and 15 min later, 30 min, 45 min and 48 hours. The counting of the final number of colony-forming units per mL (CFU/mL) was counted using the salivary samples obtained immediately after exposure of the sweetener together with the sample obtained 30 minutes later, with the cultures performed on agar plates. RESULTS: D-tagatose, stevia and sucrose presented significant differences in total CFU/mL at 30 minutes (p < 0.001), while salivary pH showed significant differences at 48 hours after administration (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: D-tagatose, stevia and sucrose present significant differences in total CFU/mL and salivary pH, these findings being a possible indication of a partial inhibitory effect on bacterial metabolism.

Una Caracterización de la Arquitectura del Sueño en Adultos con Bruxismo del Sueño: Un Estudio Descriptivo Retrospectivo / Characterization of Sleep Architecture in Adults with Sleep Bruxism: A Retrospective Descriptive Study

Objetivo: Caracterizar la arquitectura del sueño en un grupo poblacional de adultos con bruxismo del sueño, en forma general y según sexo.Materiales y método: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo, con un muestreo por intención de 33 polisomnografías que identificaban sujetos con bruxismo del sueño, según el “cut off” sugerido por Lavigne et al (25 eventos /hora), entre los años 2011-2019. Se consideraron las variables sexo, edad, peso, talla e índice de masa corporal (IMC). Se determinó la arquitectura del sueño en cuanto a duración de las etapas del sueño, micro despertares y eventos de bruxismo. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de las variables y se compraron los resultados entre los sexos.Resultados: En el grupo poblacional 64% eran mujeres y 36% hombres. El promedio de edad fue de 32.5 años, de talla 1.65, de peso 68 kg, con un IMC promedio de 24.89 (peso normal). Los sujetos tuvieron un promedio de 387.6 horas de sueño, 270 minutos en NMOR y 10.8 en MOR, con un promedio de 50 micro despertares durante la noche y de 48.64 eventos de bruxismo por hora. Según sexo los valores en minutos fueron (p>0.05): NMOR (H: 316.2 – M:256.8); MOR (H: 105 – M:104.4); microdespertares (H :58.9 – M: 45.1); Eventos de BS/hora: (H:48.6 – M: 46.6) Los sujetos con BS durmieron, en promedio, un mayor número de minutos en decúbito lateral (196,59).Conclusión: Los sujetos con BS registran determinadas características en la arquitectura del sueño que deben considerarse. No hubo diferencia en la arquitectura del sueño según sexo. (AU)

Objective: To characterize sleep architecture in a population group of adults with sleep bruxism, in general and by sex. Materials and method: Retrospective descriptive study, with intentional sampling of 33 polysomnographies that identified subjects with sleep bruxism,according to the “cut off” suggested by Lavigne et al (25 events /hour/), between the years 2011-2019. The variables sex, age, weight, height and body mass index (BMI) were considered. Sleep architecture was determined in terms of duration of sleep stages, micro-awakenings, and bruxism events. A descriptive anlysis of the variables was carried out and the results were compared between the sexes.Results: In the population group, 64% were women and 36% men. The average age was 32.5 years, height 1.65 m, weight 68 kg, with an average BMI of 24.89 (normal weight). Subjects had an average of 387.6 minutes of sleep, 270 minutes in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and 10.8 in rapid eye movement (REM), with an average of 50 micro-awakenings during the night and 48.64 bruxism events per hour. According to sex, the values in minutes were: NMOR (H:316.2 – M:256.8); MOR (H:105 – M:104.4); microawakenings (H:58.9 – M:45.1); BS events/hour: (H:48.6 – M: 46.6), no significant differences were found between them (p>0.05). Subjects with BS slept, on average, a greater number of minutes in the lateral decubitus position (196.59). Conclusion: Subjects with BS register certain characteristics in their sleep architecture that must be considered. There was no difference in sleeparchitecture according to sex.(AU)

Only half of the authors of overviews of exercise-related interventions use some strategy to manage overlapping primary studies-a metaresearch study.

OBJECTIVES: The conduct of systematic reviews (SRs) and overviews share several similarities. However, because the unit of analysis for overviews is the SRs, there are some unique challenges. One of the most critical issues to manage when conducting an overview is the overlap of data across the primary studies included in the SRs. This metaresearch study aimed to describe the frequency of strategies to manage the overlap in overviews of exercise-related interventions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic search in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, and other sources was conducted from inception to June 2022. We included overviews of SRs that considered primary studies and evaluated the effectiveness of exercise-related interventions for any health condition. The overviews were screened by two authors independently, and the extraction was performed by one author and checked by a second. We found 353 overviews published between 2005 and 2022 that met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four overviews (46%) used at least one strategy to visualize, quantify, or resolve overlap, with a matrix (32/164; 20%), absolute frequency (34/164; 21%), and authors' algorithms (24/164; 15%) being the most used methods, respectively. From 2016 onwards, there has been a trend toward increasing the use of some strategies to manage overlap. Of the 108 overviews that used some strategy to resolve the overlap, ie, avoiding double or multiple counting of primary study data, 79 (73%) succeeded. In overviews where no strategies to manage overlap were reported (n = 189/353; 54%), 16 overview authors (8%) recognized this as a study limitation. CONCLUSION: Although there is a trend toward increasing its use, only half of the authors of the overviews of exercise-related interventions used a strategy to visualize, quantify, or resolve overlap in the primary studies' data. In the future, authors should report such strategies to communicate more valid results.

Selección del diseño apropiado en investigación biomédica: fundamentos y consideraciones para la práctica basada en evidencia. Parte I

En la investigación clínica es crucial realizar una selección adecuada del diseño de investigación. Cada tipo de diseño cumple con diferentes objetivos, desde examinar prevalencias mediante diseños transversales hasta analizar exposiciones a lo largo del tiempo en estudios de cohorte. Los diseños de investigación pueden ser clasificados en primarios, como los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, o secundarios, como las revisiones. También se dividen en experimentales, que evalúan intervenciones, y observacionales que simplemente observan sin intervenir. Al elegir el diseño más apropiado, se deben tener en cuenta la pregunta de investigación, los recursos disponibles y las consideraciones éticas. Una elección acertada garantiza la validez y aplicabilidad de los resultados, lo cual resulta beneficioso tanto para la medicina como para los pacientes.

In clinical research, it is crucial to make an appropriate selection of the research design. Each type of design meets different objectives, from examining prevalences through cross-sectional designs to analyzing exposures over time in cohort studies. Research designs can be classified as primary, such as randomized clinical trials, or secondary, such as reviews. They are also divided into experimental, which evaluate interventions, and observational, which simply observe without intervening. When choosing the most appropriate design, the research question, available resources, and ethical considerations should be taken into account. A correct choice guarantees the validity and applicability of the results, which is beneficial for both medicine and patients.