Uptake and continuous use of copper intrauterine device in a cohort of HIV-positive women.

Copper intrauterine device (IUD) is not commonly used in many countries, though it provides effective reversible contraception with no or minimal primary systemic side effects. We assessed its uptake and continuation of use among HIV-positive Thai women. Sixty-six of 322 women of reproductive age, whom we approached for the study, met the eligibility criteria. Sterilization (62%) was the main reason for failure to enroll. Twenty-nine of them (44%) underwent IUD insertion. Considering condom use sufficient for pregnancy prevention (12%) was the main reason among eligible women for the refusal to participate in the study. At six months, 54% of enrolled participants reported one or more side effects such as increased menstrual flow (43%), spotting (21%) and dysmenorrhea (11%). The continuation rate of IUD use was high (93%), in spite of the persistent non-systemic side effects. The study showed that copper IUD could be an acceptable contraceptive choice for Thai HIV-positive women. Easy access to the method in a setting linked with the HIV service, and education on IUD risks and benefits is needed to promote the use of IUD in addition to condoms as an effective contraceptive option in HIV-infected women.

Efavirenz, in contrast to nevirapine, is associated with unfavorable progesterone and antiretroviral levels when coadministered with combined oral contraceptives.

BACKGROUND: Effective contraception has been widely promoted for HIV-positive women. However, there are limited data on the interactions between combined hormonal contraceptives and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors . METHODS: This study assessed the steady-state contraceptive effectiveness and safety of combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 0.150 mg desogestrel /0.030 mg ethinyl estradiol with either nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) in 34 HIV-positive women. The targeted level for contraceptive effectiveness was endogenous progesterone level < 3.0 ng/mL. We measured NVP/EFV plasma concentrations 12 hours after administration (C12) with and without COC. The desired therapeutic levels were >3.1 mg/L for NVP and 1.0-4.0 mg/L for EFV, respectively. RESULTS: All 18 subjects in the NVP group had serum progesterone <1.0 ng/mL. Four of 16 subjects (25%) in the EFV group had serum progesterone >1.0 ng/mL, including 3 subjects with >3.0 ng/mL (might indicate ovulation). The difference in progesterone levels between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P = 0.04). The median C12 of NVP increased insignificantly by 17% with COC; the median C12 of EFV decreased significantly (P = 0.02) by 22%. In 3 of 16 subjects (19%) in the EFV group, C12 of EFV dropped below 1.0 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to NVP, coadministrating desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol containing COC with EFV was associated with unfavorable progesterone and antiretroviral levels. Our results suggest that NVP may be superior to EFV when used with COC in HIV-positive women.