Intestinal Epithelial Digestive, Transport, and Barrier Protein Expression Is Increased in Environmental Enteric Dysfunction.

Environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) is characterized by malabsorption and diarrhea that result in irreversible deficits in physical and intellectual growth. We sought to define the expression of transport and tight junction proteins by quantitative analysis of duodenal biopsies from patients with EED. Biopsies from Pakistani children with confirmed EED diagnoses were compared to those from age-matched North American healthy controls, patients with celiac disease, and patients with nonceliac disease with villous atrophy or intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Expression of brush border digestive and transport proteins and paracellular (tight junction) proteins was assessed by quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence microscopy. EED was characterized by partial villous atrophy and marked intraepithelial lymphocytosis. Epithelial proliferation and enteroendocrine, tuft, and Paneth cell numbers were unchanged, but there was significant goblet cell expansion in EED biopsies. Expression of proteins involved in nutrient and water absorption and that of the basolateral Cl- transport protein NKCC1 were also increased in EED. Finally, the barrier-forming tight junction protein claudin-4 (CLDN4) was significantly upregulated in EED, particularly within villous enterocytes. In contrast, expression of CFTR, CLDN2, CLDN15, JAM-A, occludin, ZO-1, and E-cadherin was unchanged. Upregulation of a barrier-forming tight junction protein and brush border and basolateral membrane proteins that support nutrient and water transport in EED is paradoxical, as their increased expression would be expected to be correlated with increased intestinal barrier function and enhanced absorption, respectively. These data suggest that EED activates adaptive intestinal epithelial responses to enhance nutrient absorption but that these changes are insufficient to restore health.

Detection of Typhoidal and Paratyphoidal Salmonella in Blood by Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for diagnosis of enteric fever caused by Salmonella Typhi or Salmonella Paratyphi A or B is bone marrow culture. However, because bone marrow aspiration is highly invasive, many hospitals and large health centers perform blood culture instead. As blood culture has several limitations, there is a need for novel typhoid diagnostics with improved sensitivity and more rapid time to detection. METHODS: We developed a clyA-based real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method to detect Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A simultaneously in blood. The sensitivity and specificity of this probeset was first evaluated in vitro in the laboratory and then in a typhoid-endemic population, in Karachi, Pakistan, and in healthy US volunteers. RESULTS: We optimized a DNA extraction and real-time PCR-based method that could reliably detect 1 colony-forming unit/mL of Salmonella Typhi. The probe set was able to detect clinical Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A strains and also diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, but not invasive E. coli or other invasive bacteria. In the field, the clyA qPCR diagnostic was 40% as sensitive as blood culture. However, when qPCR-positive specimens were considered to be true positives, blood culture only exhibited 28.57% sensitivity. Specificity was ≥90% for all comparisons and in the healthy US volunteers. qPCR was significantly faster than blood culture in terms of detection of typhoid and paratyphoid. CONCLUSIONS: Based on lessons learned, we recommend that future field trials of this and other novel diagnostics that detect typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella employ multiple methodologies to define a "positive" sample.