Comparison between endovascular and surgical treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a single-center cohort and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: With recent advancements in minimally invasive techniques, endovascular embolization has gained popularity as a first-line treatment option for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (sDAVFs). The authors present their institution's case series of sDAVFs treated endovascularly and surgically, and they performed a systemic review to assess the outcomes of both modalities of treatment. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective observational study of 24 consecutive patients with sDAVFs treated between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of occlusion, which was compared between the surgically and endovascularly treated sDAVFs. They also conducted a systemic review of all the literature comparing outcomes of endovascular and surgical treatment of sDAVFs. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with 24 sDAVFs were studied. The mean patient age was 63.8 ± 15.5 years, and the majority of patients were male (n = 19, 79.2%). Of the 24 patients, 8 (33.3%) received endovascular treatment, 15 (62.5%) received surgical treatment, and 1 (4.2%) patient received both. Complete occlusion at first follow-up was higher in the surgical cohort but did not achieve statistical significance (66.7% vs 25%, p = 0.52). Recurrence was higher in the endovascular cohort (37.5% vs 13.3%, p = 0.3), while the rate of postprocedural complications was higher in the surgical cohort (13.3% vs 0%, p = 0.52); however, neither of these differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular embolization in the management of sDAVFs is an alternative treatment to surgery, whose long-term efficacy is still under investigation. These findings suggest overall comparable outcomes between endovascular and open surgical treatment of sDAVFs. Future studies are needed to determine the role of endovascular embolization in the overall management of sDAVFs.

Alternate Electrode Placements to Facilitate Frontal Electroencephalography Monitoring in Anesthetized and Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Frontal electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring can be useful in guiding the titration of anesthetics, but it is not always feasible to place electrodes in the standard configuration in some circumstances, including during neurosurgery. This study compares 5 alternate configurations of the Masimo Sedline Sensor. METHODS: Ten stably sedated patients in the intensive care unit were recruited. Frontal EEG was monitored in the standard configuration (bifrontal upright) and 5 alternate configurations: bifrontal inverse, infraorbital, lateral upright, lateral inverse, and semilateral. Average power spectral densities (PSDs) with 95% CIs in the alternate configurations were compared to PSDs in the standard configuration. Two-one-sided-testing with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed equivalence in the spectral edge frequency (SEF-95), EEG power, and relative delta (0.5 to 3.5 Hz), alpha (8 to 12 Hz), and beta (20 to 30 Hz) power between each alternate and standard configurations. RESULTS: After the removal of unanalyzable tracings, 7 patients were included for analysis in the infraorbital configuration and 9 in all other configurations. In the lateral upright and lateral inverse configurations, PSDs significantly differed from the standard configuration within the 15 to 20 Hz band. The greatest decrease in EEG power was in the lateral inverse configuration (median: -97 dB; IQR: -130, -62 dB). The largest change in frequency distribution of EEG power was in the infraorbital configuration; median SEF-95 change of -1.4 Hz (IQR: -2.8, 0.7 Hz), median relative delta power change of +7.3% (IQR: 1.4%, 7.9%), and median relative alpha power change of -0.6% (IQR: -5.7%, 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: These 5 alternate Sedline electrode configurations are suitable options for monitoring frontal EEG when the standard configuration is not possible.

Telemetric electroencephalography recording in anesthetized mice-A novel system using minimally-invasive needle electrodes with a wireless OpenBCI™ Cyton Biosensing Board.

Telemetric electroencephalography (EEG) recording, using subdermal needle electrodes, is a minimally-invasive method to investigate mammalian neurophysiology during anesthesia. These inexpensive systems may streamline experiments examining global brain phenomena during surgical anesthesia or disease. We utilized the OpenBCI™ Cyton board with subdermal needle electrodes to extract EEG features in six C57BL/6J mice undergoing isoflurane anesthesia. Burst suppression ratio (BSR) and spectral features were compared for a verification of our method. Following an increase from 1.5% to 2.0% isoflurane, the BSR increased (Wilcoxon-signed-rank statistic; p = 0.0313). Furthermore, although the absolute EEG spectral power decreased, the relative spectral power remained comparable (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-Statistic; 95% CI exclusive AUC=0.5; p < 0.05). Compared to tethered systems, this method confers several improvements for anesthesia specific protocols: 1-Avoiding electrode implant surgical procedures, 2-Anatomical non-specificity for needle electrode placement to monitor global cortical activity representative of anesthetic state, 3-Facility to repeat recordings in the same animal, 4-User-friendly for non-experts, 5-Rapid set-up time, and 6-Lower costs.•Minimally-invasive telemetric EEG recording systems ergonomically improve tethered systems for anesthesia protocols.•Using this method, we verified that higher isoflurane concentrations resulted in an increased EEG burst suppression ratio and decreased EEG absolute spectral power, with no change in frequency distribution.