Deployment of Point-of-Care Echocardiography to Improve Cardiac Diagnostic Access Among American Indians.

BACKGROUND: American Indians face significant barriers to diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. We sought to develop a real-world implementation model for improving access to echocardiography within the Indian Health Service, the American Indian Structural Heart Disease Partnership. METHODS AND RESULTS: The American Indian Structural Heart Disease Partnership was implemented and evaluated via a 4-step process of characterizing the system where it would be instituted, building point-of-care echocardiography capacity, deploying active case finding for structural heart disease, and evaluating the approach from the perspective of the clinician and patient. Data were collected and analyzed using a parallel convergent mixed methods approach. Twelve health care providers successfully completed training in point-of-care echocardiography. While there was perceived usefulness of echocardiography, providers found it difficult to integrate screening point-of-care echocardiography into their workday given competing demands. By the end of 12 months, 6 providers continued to actively utilize point-of-care echocardiography. Patients who participated in the study felt it was an acceptable and effective approach. They also identified access to transportation as a notable challenge to accessing echocardiograms. Over the 12-month period, a total of 639 patients were screened, of which 36 (5.6%) had a new clinically significant abnormal finding. CONCLUSIONS: The American Indian Structural Heart Disease Partnership model exhibited several promising strategies to improve access to screening echocardiography for American Indian populations. However, competing priorities for Indian Health Service providers' time limited the amount of integration of screening echocardiography into outpatient practice. Future endeavors should explore community-based solutions to develop a more sustainable model with greater impact on case detection, disease management, and improved outcomes.

Impact of COVID-19 on inpatient clinical emergencies: A single-center experience.

AIM: Determine changes in rapid response team (RRT) activations and describe institutional adaptations made during a surge in hospitalizations for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Using prospectively collected data, we compared characteristics of RRT calls at our academic hospital from March 7 through May 31, 2020 (COVID-19 era) versus those from January 1 through March 6, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 era). We used negative binomial regression to test differences in RRT activation rates normalized to floor (non-ICU) inpatient census between pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras, including the sub-era of rapid COVID-19 census surge and plateau (March 28 through May 2, 2020). RESULTS: RRT activations for respiratory distress rose substantially during the rapid COVID-19 surge and plateau (2.38 (95% CI 1.39-3.36) activations per 1000 floor patient-days v. 1.27 (0.82-1.71) during the pre-COVID-19 era; p = 0.02); all-cause RRT rates were not significantly different (5.40 (95% CI 3.94-6.85) v. 4.83 (3.86-5.80) activations per 1000 floor patient-days, respectively; p = 0.52). Throughout the COVID-19 era, respiratory distress accounted for a higher percentage of RRT activations in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 patients (57% vs. 28%, respectively; p = 0.001). During the surge, we adapted RRT guidelines to reduce in-room personnel and standardize personal protective equipment based on COVID-19 status and risk to providers, created decision-support pathways for respiratory emergencies that accounted for COVID-19 status uncertainty, and expanded critical care consultative support to floor teams. CONCLUSION: Increased frequency and complexity of RRT activations for respiratory distress during the COVID-19 surge prompted the creation of clinical tools and strategies that could be applied to other hospitals.

Perioperative Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Transesophageal Echocardiography in Resource- Limited Settings-A Focus on Nepal and Bangladesh.

The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the perioperative and critical care setting is increasing worldwide. This increase has been driven by increasing educational opportunities and technologic advances. Nepal and Bangladesh are resource-limited countries where concerted efforts have been made to increase training in POCUS or TEE in the perioperative and critical care settings. This paper's focus is to present the current state of use and international efforts to improve education and skills in perioperative POCUS and TEE in Nepal and Bangladesh. The authors also examine the challenges to improving and expanding ultrasound use in the perioperative environment in resource- limited environments in general, using the Nepalese and Bangladeshi experiences as case studies. The authors have held multiple short courses in POCUS or TEE in Nepal and Bangladesh over the past several years. The authors found a high level of interest in learning POCUS and TEE skills among participants. They encountered challenges with maintaining continuing education and quality assurance for participants after the courses. They also identified barriers to incorporating ultrasound into daily practice in local hospitals. An increasing prevalence of cardiovascular disease will increase the need for diagnostic strategies for patients worldwide, including the use of POCUS and TEE, to manage patients in the perioperative and critical care settings. The courses held in Nepal and Bangladesh may serve as models to expand educational opportunities in POCUS and perioperative TEE in resource-limited settings.