Influence of government-driven quality assessment program on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) has launched the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Quality Assessment Program (CQAP) since 2014. We aimed to reveal the influence of this national program on clinical outcomes and the burden of COPD in Korea. METHODS: The CQAP is conducted annually. We used healthcare claims data linked with the results of the program provided by HIRA between May 2014 and April 2017. Patients were considered to have COPD if they visited a hospital for COPD management during the assessment term. Those who visited a medical institution for COPD and were prescribed COPD medications at least twice were assessed by the CQAP (assessed subjects, AS; not-assessed subjects, NAS). CQAP evaluated the pulmonary function test conduction rate, regular visitation rate, and prescription rates of COPD medications. RESULTS: Among the 560,000 patients with COPD, about 140,000 were assessed by the CQAP annually. In both groups, the pulmonary function test conduction rate and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rate improved since 2014. Compared to the NAS group, the risk of admission and all-cause mortality rate in the AS group were significantly reduced by 21.2% and 40.7%, respectively. In patients who were assessed for 3 consecutive years, all of the above variables were high at baseline and were not improved much from implementation of CQAP. In matching analysis, we observed this improvement to be limited in the COPD quality assessment year. CONCLUSIONS: The CQAP by the health insurance bureau has improved the management protocol and prognosis of COPD.

Impact of the Asthma Quality Assessment Program on Burden of Asthma.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service launched the Asthma Quality Assessment Program (AQAP) to assess whether patients with asthma were well managed. OBJECTIVE: To show the impact of the AQAP on the medical utilization behavior for asthma. METHODS: We used claims data linked with the results of the AQAP performed between July 2013 and June 2017. Asthma was determined when subjects visited hospital for asthma. Subjects who used asthma medications on at least 2 different occasions were assessed by the AQAP (assessed subjects [Ass]; not-assessed subjects [NASs]). The AQAP evaluated conduction rate of the pulmonary function test, routine visit rate, and prescription rate of asthma medications. Primary clinics were classified as "good" and "not-good" clinics according to the results of the AQAP. RESULTS: Of the 4.3 million subjects with asthma screened, about 0.8 million were assessed by the AQAP annually. Both the conduction rate of pulmonary function test and the prescription rate of inhaled corticosteroids in the ASs and NASs were improved. In addition, the risk of admission and yearly all-cause mortality were significantly reduced (risk reduction rate, 17.1 and 24.4%, respectively, both P < .001) in the AS group compared with the NAS group. However, effects of the AQAP varied according to the subgroup, and they were restricted to the assessment term. In addition, the admission rate and all-cause mortality were decreased by 94.7% and 45.3%, respectively, in "good" clinics as opposed to the "not-good" clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Performing the AQAP improved both the management protocol and prognosis of asthma in Korea.

Relationship Between Changes in Inhalation Treatment Level and Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Nationwide the Health Insurance and Assessment Service Database.

Background and Objective: Maintaining adequacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care is essential to sustain an adequate level of care. We aimed to assess the current status of COPD quality control and the influence of inhaler changes on disease-related health care utilization. Methods: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) nationwide database for reimbursed insurance claims from all medical institutions in South Korea from May 2014 to April 2017 was investigated. COPD care quality was assessed by the performance rate of spirometry, the percentage of persistent visit patients and patients prescribed a bronchodilator. The number of severe exacerbations was evaluated. Results: A total of 68,942 COPD patients were included for 3 years of longitudinal analyses. The overall spirometry enforcement rate was just over 50%, the percentage of regular follow-up patients was over 85%, and bronchodilators were prescribed to over 80% of the patients. COPD-related hospitalization or ER visit rates were 16.6%, 15.3%, and 17.8% for three consequent assessments, respectively. Inhaler changes were analyzed between the first and second assessments: 57.1% were maintained, 0.4% were changed to another class, 9% were escalated, and 5.2% were de-escalated. Only in the escalated group, especially those who changed from the mono to dual inhaler and dual to triple inhaler, had fewer hospitalizations or ER visits. Conclusion: Adequacy of COPD care status was not that high considering the low-enforcement rate of spirometry, but most patients were prescribed a bronchodilator and regularly followed up. Those who escalated inhaler treatment experienced less health care utilization.

Frequent Outpatient Visits Prevent Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory airway disease requiring frequent outpatient visits and lifelong management. We aimed to evaluate the roles of frequent outpatient visits in prognosis of COPD. We used claims data in the national medical insurance review system provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea from May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2015. A definition of COPD was used based on the diagnosis code and medication. Frequent visitors were defined as subjects who visited the outpatient clinic for COPD three or more times per year. Among 159,025 subjects, 117,483 (73.9%) were classified as frequent visitors. Frequent visitors underwent pulmonary function tests and used various inhalers more often than did infrequent visitors. The rates of COPD exacerbation requiring admission to a general ward, emergency room, or intensive care unit were significantly lower in frequent visitors than in infrequent visitors. In multivariable analysis, frequent visits were identified as an independent factor preventing COPD exacerbation that required admission to a ward (odds ratio [OR], 0.387), emergency room, (OR, 0.558), or intensive care unit (OR, 0.39) (all P < 0.001). In conclusion, we showed frequent outpatient visits reduce the risk of COPD exacerbation by 45-60%.

Nationwide quality assessment of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires careful ambulatory care. If treatment is effective, exacerbation and hospitalization can be preventable. Appropriate management is important; the disease prevalence is high, as is the demand on healthcare resources. Here, we have reported the results of nationwide quality assessment performed with the aims of improving patient management, reducing progression to severe status, and minimizing medical care expenses. METHODS: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) engaged in quality assessment three times from May 2014 to April 2017. Medical care institutions were evaluated in terms of the pulmonary function test (PFT), patient revisit, and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates. RESULTS: The numbers of patients assessed were 141,782, 142,790, and 143,339 in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; the numbers of medical care institutions assessed were 6,691, 6,722, and 6,470, respectively. The PFT implementation rates were 58.7%, 62.5%, and 67.9% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates were highest for tertiary hospitals, followed by general and local hospitals, as well as primary healthcare clinics. The repeat visit rates were 85.5%, 92.1%, and 85.0% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates were highest for general hospitals, followed by local and tertiary hospitals, and primary healthcare clinics. The inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates were 67.9%, 71.2%, and 76.9% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates increased with increasing hospital grade. CONCLUSIONS: The PFT and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates improved over the 3-year nationwide quality assessment period.