Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with high morbidity and mortality predominately due to increased cardiovascular risk. Few reports are available regarding the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) in RA patients and the long-term clinical outcomes after coronary revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients with RA were identified by retrospective review at a rheumatology tertiary center in Milan, Italy between 2001 and 2013. RA patients affected by significant CAD (RA-CAD+) were prospectively followed for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after percutaneous coronary revascularization (RA-PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (RA-CABG) or medical therapy (RA-MT). Among 936 patients with RA, the presence of clinically significant CAD was found in 5.6% (53 patients, RA-CAD+). Of these, 32 patients (60%) underwent PCI (RA-PCI), 10 patients (19%) underwent CABG (RA-CABG) and 11 patients (21%) treated with MT (RA-MT). After a mean follow-up of 9±7 years, the rate of MACCE was 56% in RA-PCI patients, 50% in RA-CABG and 27% in RA-MT patients (P=0.184). The high MACCE rate was mainly driven by repeat coronary revascularization (47%) in the RA-PCI group and high rate of strokes (30%) in RA-CABG patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant coronary artery disease (RA-CAD+), we observed at long-term follow-up a high MACCE rate, predominantly in those who underwent coronary revascularization.

ELISPOT-IFN-gamma assay instead of tuberculin skin test for detecting latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in rheumatic patients candidate to anti-TNF-alpha treatment.

In rheumatic patients candidate to anti-TNF-alpha treatment, there is an increased risk of developing tuberculosis (TB). The tuberculin skin test (TST), the standard diagnostic test for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), suffers low specificity and sensitivity. Here, we compared the performance characteristics of an in-house ELISPOT-IFN-gamma assay (using a restricted pool of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific peptides or MTP) to TST for the diagnosis of LTBI in 69 rheumatic patients candidate to anti-TNF-alpha treatment and in 60 healthy LTBI individuals. Among the 69 patients enrolled, 17 (25%) had a positive TST response and 15 (22%) a positive ELISPOT-MTP response. Among the patients with a positive TST result, eight had a positive and nine a negative ELISPOT-MTP response, whereas among the 49 patients with a negative TST result, 42 were ELISPOT-MTP negative, but seven (14%) were ELISPOT-MTP positive, with three indeterminate results. The agreement between the two tests was poor (k = 0.341, 95% CI = 0.060 to 0.622) and the test of symmetry was not significant (P = 0.8). Considering the ELISPOT assay, rheumatic patients had a reduced number of spot-forming cells after stimulation of lymphocytes with PHA or PPD when compared with healthy LTBI individuals. Thus, the ELISPOT-IFN-gamma assay performs better than the TST in recognizing patients with LTBI, on one hand reducing the number of patients submitted to isoniazid prophylaxis, and on the other hand, since the assay is less biased by immunosuppressive regimens than TST, recognizing LTBI patients among those with a negative TST response.

Efficacy of traditional and biologic agents in different clinical phenotypes of adult-onset Still's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of antiinflammatory agents, steroids, immunosuppressants, and biologic agents in patients with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) who have either chronic articular disease or nonchronic disease. METHODS: Forty-five patients with AOSD were seen and followed up for at least 2 years at our institution, from 1991 to 2008. The majority of patients were treated with several therapeutic regimens; a total of 152 efficacy trials were administered. Data regarding the type of medication, the dosage used, and the outcome of these trials were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Our data showed that the efficacy of monotherapy with a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug was very low (16%) and confirmed good efficacy of steroid therapy (63%), particularly in patients without chronic articular disease (78%). Patients whose disease did not respond to steroid therapy at the time of disease onset were at risk of the subsequent development of chronic arthritis. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) monotherapy was successful in controlling steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent disease in 60% of patients. Methotrexate and cyclosporine showed the best response rates. The combination of high-dose steroids and cyclosporine was administered to successfully control some acute life-threatening complications. Only 6 patients had disease that was both steroid resistant and DMARD resistant. Treatment with biologic agents eventually led to satisfactory control of disease manifestations in 5 (83%) of these 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Steroids were less effective in patients with chronic articular disease than in those with nonchronic disease. The administration of DMARDs early after disease onset could be beneficial in patients with steroid-resistant disease who are at risk of the development of chronic articular disease. Biologic agents proved to be highly effective in both steroid-resistant and DMARD-resistant AOSD.

Circulating chromogranin A reveals extra-articular involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and curbs TNF-alpha-elicited endothelial activation.

TNF-alpha plays an important role in the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a systemic disease characterized by endothelial activation and synovial involvement with bone erosions. Neuroendocrine signals contribute as well to RA, but their role is poorly understood. We measured in 104 RA patients and in an equal number of sex- and age-matched, healthy controls the blood levels of chromogranin A (CgA), a candidate marker linking the neuroendocrine system to TNF-alpha-mediated vascular inflammation. CgA levels were significantly higher in patients with RA and remained stable over time. High levels of CgA were significantly associated with severe extra-articular manifestations, namely pulmonary fibrosis, rheumatoid vasculitis, serositis, and peripheral neuropathy. RA sera curbed the response of human microvascular endothelial cells to TNF-alpha, as assessed by the expression of ICAM-1, the release of MCP-1/CCL2, and the export of nuclear high-mobility group box 1; the effect abated in the presence of anti-CgA antibodies. The efficacy of the blockade was significantly correlated with the CgA concentration in the serum. The recombinant aminoterminal portion of CgA, corresponding to residues 1-78, had similar inhibitory effects on endothelial cells challenged with TNF-alpha. Our results suggest that enhanced levels of CgA identify patients with extra-articular involvement and reveal a negative feedback loop that limits the activation of endothelial cells in RA.

Neuroendocrine modulation induced by selective blockade of TNF-alpha in rheumatoid arthritis.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) is a main actor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), interacting with other molecules in complex mechanisms. The neuroendocrine system is known to be involved and Chromogranin A (CHGA) serum levels are elevated in patients with RA. We evaluated the effect of the selective blockade of TNF-alpha, induced by treatment with anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), on the serum levels of CHGA and on its correlation with TNF-alpha and TNF-alpha receptors (TNFRs) serum levels. Seven patients with RA have been treated with the anti-TNF-alpha mAb, infliximab. We measured the serum levels of TNF-alpha, its receptors (tumor necrosis factor receptor-I [TNFR-I] and tumor necrosis factor receptor-II [TNFR-II]), and CHGA before and during the treatment. We also measured, as a control, the serum levels of CHGA, TNF-alpha, and soluble TNFRs in 14 patients who were being treated with infliximab, adalimumab, or etanercept and in 20 matching negative controls. The serum levels of TNFR-I and TNFR-II, which are a sensitive marker for the TNF-alpha pathway, correlated with those of CHGA before treatment (Pearson's coefficient, respectively, 0.59 and 0.53). Treatment with anti-TNF-alpha mAb provided a significant clinical response in all patients and the correlation between CHGA and TNFR-I and TNFR-II was no more evident during treatment (respectively, -0.09 and -0.07). TNF-alpha blockade allows a clinical effect in patients with RA and modifies the correlation between CHGA and TNFRs, suggesting that TNF-alpha and CHGA reciprocally interfere in the pathogenesis of RA, through intermediate adaptors, whose identification warrants further studies.