Codesign of health technology interventions to support best-practice perioperative care and surgical waitlist management.

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to determine where health technology can support best-practice perioperative care for patients waiting for surgery. METHODS: An exploratory codesign process used personas and journey mapping in three interprofessional workshops to identify key challenges in perioperative care across four health districts in Sydney, Australia. Through participatory methodology, the research inquiry directly involved perioperative clinicians. In three facilitated workshops, clinician and patient participants codesigned potential digital interventions to support perioperative pathways. Workshop output was coded and thematically analysed, using design principles. RESULTS: Codesign workshops, involving 51 participants, were conducted October to November 2022. Participants designed seven patient personas, with consumer representatives confirming acceptability and diversity. Interprofessional team members and consumers mapped key clinical moments, feelings and barriers for each persona during a hypothetical perioperative journey. Six key themes were identified: 'preventative care', 'personalised care', 'integrated communication', 'shared decision-making', 'care transitions' and 'partnership'. Twenty potential solutions were proposed, with top priorities a digital dashboard and virtual care coordination. DISCUSSION: Our findings emphasise the importance of interprofessional collaboration, patient and family engagement and supporting health technology infrastructure. Through user-based codesign, participants identified potential opportunities where health technology could improve system efficiencies and enhance care quality for patients waiting for surgical procedures. The codesign approach embedded users in the development of locally-driven, contextually oriented policies to address current perioperative service challenges, such as prolonged waiting times and care fragmentation. CONCLUSION: Health technology innovation provides opportunities to improve perioperative care and integrate clinical information. Future research will prototype priority solutions for further implementation and evaluation.

Prescriber decision-making on antithrombotic therapy after endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, despite surgical and endovascular treatments. Emerging evidence supports the use of immediate antithrombotic medications after endovascular intervention for PAD, however, there is a lack of consensus regarding choice and duration of antithrombotic therapy. Prescriber decision-making is a complex process, with prior studies demonstrating patient factors can influence variability in antithrombotic therapy for PAD. However, it remains unclear the relative contribution of these factors. This paper describes a planned study that aims to (1) determine the influence of patient factors on clinician preference for antithrombotic therapy following endovascular intervention and (2) compare differences in prescribing preferences between consultant vascular surgeons and trainees. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional survey will evaluate antithrombotic prescribing choices using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) that has been developed and piloted for this study. A list of attributes and levels was generated using a mixed-methods approach. This included an extensive literature review and semistructured interviews with prescribing clinicians. Following final selection of included attributes, specialised software was used to construct a D-efficient design for the DCE questionnaire. The electronic questionnaire will be administered to vascular trainees and consultant surgeons across Australia. These data will be analysed using multinomial logistic regression, treating the decision to prescribe antithrombotic therapy as a function of both the attributes of the two alternatives, as well as characteristics of the respondent. Latent class analysis will be used to explore heterogeneity of responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Ethics committee (2023/474). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national vascular surgical conferences. These results will be used to improve understanding how clinicians make prescribing decisions and to inform future strategy to enhance guideline-directed prescribing.

The prevalent causes of death in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing revascularisation or amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Preventing untimely death in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requires a detailed understanding of the predominant causes of death (COD). This literature review aims to describe how short- and long-term COD are reported in patients who had surgery for PAD. METHODS: A literature review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for articles reporting specific causes of mortality in patients who had surgery for all stages of PAD. Articles were included if they reported COD after open surgical or endovascular revascularisation, or major or minor amputation for PAD. Critical appraisals were conducted according to included study types, using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. RESULTS: Cause of death was reported in 21 publications. Twenty were observational and one was a randomised control trial. Study size ranged from 25 to 10,505 patients. Cardiovascular disease was the most prevalent COD in perioperative periods (42.5% from 13 studies). Long-term follow-up ranged from 1 month and 7 years with 15 studies reporting cardiac related mortality as the most frequent cause of death. However, mortality from neoplasia, respiratory disease (including pneumonia and pulmonary emboli), stroke and sepsis were prevalent. Many studies were low-average quality, with few population-based observational studies. CONCLUSION: Whilst cardiovascular COD are the most prevalent reasons for mortality in patients with PAD, the proportion of patients dying from neoplasia and respiratory disease is high. Improved reporting standards for COD in studies examining PAD are needed.

Protocol for a qualitative study exploring haemodialysis dependent patients' arteriovenous fistula experience, values and concerns in Sydney, Australia.

INTRODUCTION: The experiences of patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, with chronic mental illness, disabilities or who identify as sexual or religious minorities are under-represented in clinical research on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for haemodialysis access. A greater understanding of the experiences, values and concerns of these diverse patient groups are needed to provide haemodialysis access care that addresses the needs of all haemodialysis-dependent patients. This study seeks to describe a broad range of patient experiences related to the creation, care and surveillance of AVFs, including interactions with healthcare teams. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This qualitative study will use semistructured interviews with individual patients purposefully selected to provide a diverse patient population. A deliberate strategy will be used to recruit a demographically broad range of participants. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts, using a constant comparative methodology, will generate themes that describe patient experiences, values and concerns. Findings from this study will give a nuanced insight into the experiences of patients on haemodialysis with respect to their AVF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was provided by the Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (REGIS identifier: 2021/ETH00362, CH reference number: CH62/6/2021-033). Results will be made available to the participants, local health district, funders and other researchers through various hospital and academic forums. Data will also be published in peer-reviewed journals and be part of a larger body of work looking into patient-reported outcome measures for patients with AVF.

Protocol for the Stimulating ß3-Adrenergic Receptors for Peripheral Artery Disease (STAR-PAD) trial: a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of mirabegron on functional performance in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

INTRODUCTION: There is currently only one approved medication effective at improving walking distance in people with intermittent claudication. Preclinical data suggest that the ß3-adrenergic receptor agonist (mirabegron) could be repurposed to treat intermittent claudication associated with peripheral artery disease. The aim of the Stimulating ß3-Adrenergic Receptors for Peripheral Artery Disease (STAR-PAD) trial is to test whether mirabegron improves walking distance in people with intermittent claudication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The STAR-PAD trial is a Phase II, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of mirabegron versus placebo on walking distance in patients with PAD. A total of 120 patients aged ≥40 years with stable PAD and intermittent claudication will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either mirabegron (50 mg orally once a day) or matched placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is change in peak walking distance as assessed by a graded treadmill test. Secondary endpoints will include: (i) initial claudication distance; (ii) average daily step count and total step count and (iii) functional status and quality of life assessment. Mechanistic substudies will examine potential effects of mirabegron on vascular function, including brachial artery flow-mediate dilatation; MRI assessment of lower limb blood flow, tissue perfusion and arterial stiffness and numbers and angiogenesis potential of endothelial progenitor cells. Given that mirabegron is safe and clinically available for alternative purposes, a positive study is positioned to immediately impact patient care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The STAR-PAD trial is approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/HAWKE/50). The study results will be published in peer-reviewed medical or scientific journals and presented at scientific meetings, regardless of the study outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619000423112; Results.

A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient Concerns and Values in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the debilitating end stage of peripheral artery disease, causing patients to experience low quality of life and poor health outcomes. It is unknown which aspects of care patients with CLTI value. This pilot qualitative study aims to explore patients' concerns and values related to CLTI treatment, to better inform patient-centered care. METHODS: A qualitative study design was piloted to explore the experiences of patients with CLTI undergoing elective vascular surgery. In-depth, semistructured interviews were recorded preoperatively and 3 mo after discharge. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using content analysis, to derive patient-centered themes. Findings were mapped to a framework of patient-centered care. RESULTS: Twelve interviews from six participants were analyzed. Five themes related to participant experiences of CLTI were identified: treatment and diagnosis, concerns about symptoms, limitations in physical function, social function, and emotional function. Participants expressed how CLTI intruded on all aspects of their lives. Framework analysis demonstrated CLTI patients valued patient-centered care relating to both relational and functional aspects of care. In particular, participants valued supportive and trustworthy care, in addition to integrated, holistic care that recognized the patient in the context of their overall health and life. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility was demonstrated for both study design and methodology. Data obtained from interviews were sufficiently "rich and thick" in quality and quantity to allow for common themes related to experience and health care values in patients with CLTI to be identified. If confirmed in future studies, these findings will enhance patient-centered care in CLTI.

Incidence, prognostic factors and impact of postoperative delirium after major vascular surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Although postoperative delirium is a common complication and increases patient care needs, little is known about the predictors and outcomes of delirium in patients having vascular surgery. This review aimed to determine the incidence, prognostic factors and impact of postoperative delirium in vascular surgical patients. MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for articles published between January 2000 and January 2016 on delirium after vascular surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium. Secondary outcomes were contributing prognostic factors and impact of delirium. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool for systematic reviews of prognostic studies, and MOOSE guidelines for reviews of observational studies. Quantitative analyses of extracted data were conducted using meta-analysis where possible to determine incidence of delirium and prognostic factors. A qualitative review of outcomes was performed. Fifteen articles were eligible for inclusion. Delirium incidence ranged between 5% and 39%. Meta-analysis found that patients with delirium were older than those without delirium (OR 3.6, p<0.001). Prognostic factors predicting delirium included increased age (OR 1.04, p<0.001), pre-existing cognitive impairment (OR 9.8, p=0.01), hypertension, pre-existing depression and open aortic surgery. Delirious patients remained in hospital 6 days longer ( p<0.001) and had more complications than patients without delirium. Data were limited on the impact of procedure complexity, endovascular compared to open surgery or type of anaesthetic. Postoperative delirium occurs frequently, resulting in major morbidity for vascular patients. Improved quality of prognostic studies may identify modifiable peri-operative factors to improve quality of care for vascular surgical patients.