Effect of Age on Liver Transplantation Recipient Outcomes: Two Centers' Experience.

BACKGROUND: Liver diseases epidemiology has changed with advances in perioperative care. Transplantation at large centers is favorable among older and younger recipients. Local limitations on transplantation for recipients older than 65 years were cancelled in 2014. This study evaluates the effects of age on the transplantation outcome of Israeli patients in the era after removal of the limitations on recipient age. METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined prospective data on patients older than 18 years who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2019 at 2 transplantation centers. Patients were divided into 4 age groups (group 1: ≤59 years; group 2: 60-64 years; group 3: 65-69 years; and group 4: ≥70 years). Each group's associations of pretransplantation factors with outcome and survival were examined. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one recipients underwent 269 transplantations (mean age: 53 ± 12.61 y). There were 181 male (67.8%) and 88 female recipients (67.28%). Overall, 207 patients (79.6%) survived ≥12 months. One-year survival rates were 82.9%, 73.2%, 71.4%, and 93.8% for groups 1 to 4, respectively (not statistically significant; P = .11). One-year graft survival was similar between groups. More patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, or ischemic heart disease tended to survive <12 months. Cardiovascular complication was more common in older groups and affected survival. CONCLUSION: Patient age alone should not be used to deny access to transplantation, which could benefit older nonfrail individuals. However, risk factors such as male sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and concomitant kidney-liver transplantation should be carefully considered.

Long-term results of desensitization protocol with and without rituximab in sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization protocols have been developed in order to overcome the immunological barrier of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). METHODS: During 2006-2012, we implemented a program for desensitizing sensitized (positive DSA, negative NIH-CDC crossmatch) living-donor recipients. The long-term outcome of 36 sensitized recipients, treated with IVIG and plasmapheresis (PP), with or without rituximab (added when > 7500 MFI), was compared to 252 non-sensitized living-donor recipients. RESULTS: Median peak DSA level before desensitization was 7223 (range 3567-16 000) MFI. During a mean follow-up of 121.9 months, graft loss occurred in 6/36 (17%) of the sensitized and 15/251 (6%) of the non-sensitized recipients (P = 0.021). Five-year and 10-year death-censored graft survival rates were 85% and 81% compared to 95% and 92%, respectively, for the non-sensitized recipients. There was no difference in recipients' survival. Slightly more episodes of acute rejection occurred in the sensitized group but had not influence on graft survival. At the last follow-up, 28 recipients had functioning graft; seventeen (47%) did not have detectable DSA. Eleven recipients had excellent graft function despite having detectable DSA. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes of sensitized recipients who underwent desensitization are encouraging. Adding rituximab to PP + IVIG in candidates with very high titers may result in improved outcome.

Postshunt hepatic encephalopathy in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Preexisting spontaneous portosystemic shunts increase the risk of posttransplantation portal vein thrombosis. Portosystemic shunts may also be placed surgically to manage posttransplant portal vein stenosis/thrombosis. Both types may be complicated by hepatic encephalopathy. METHODS: The database of a major tertiary medical center from 1999 to 2006 was searched for liver transplant recipients with hepatic encephalopathy and stable liver function. The medical and imaging files were reviewed for risk factors, management, and outcome. RESULTS: Of the 244 patients who underwent liver transplantation during the study period, four (1.6%) met the inclusion criteria. Median age at transplantation was 49 years (range 39-54); median time to the first episode of hepatic encephalopathy after transplantation was 23 months (range 2-40). In two patients, a distal splenorenal shunt placed at 1 and 7 months after transplantation to treat portal vein thrombosis led to hepatic encephalopathy at 1 and 33 months later. Both responded to medical therapy. The other two patients had spontaneous splenorenal shunts, and hepatic encephalopathy appeared 33 months and 12 months after transplantation. Treatment consisted of transhepatic percutaneous portal vein dilatation with stent insertion in the first patient and interposition of a venous graft between the superior mesenteric and left intrahepatic portal veins to reroute splanchnic flow in the second patient. CONCLUSIONS: Portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients with stable graft function may be associated with hepatic encephalopathy. Pretransplant assessment to detect unknown spontaneous shunts is important. Restoration of portal flow is the preferred procedure in this setting.