RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There was no scientific evidence about the initial treatment of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the impact of using HSS along with a loop diuretic (LD) as the first diuretic treatment for ADHF, focusing on renal function, electrolyte levels, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, 171 adult patients (93 females/78 males) with ADHF were included between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Patients were allocated into two groups: upfront combo HSS+LD and standardized LD. The primary endpoint was worsening renal function (WRF). Hospitalization for HF and all-cause mortality were evaluated during 6 months of follow-up. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. RESULTS: The groups exhibited similarities in baseline characteristics.A significantly higher diuresis on the 1st day (3975 [3000-5150] vs. 2583 [2000-3250], p=0.001) and natriuresis on the 2nd hour (116.00 [82.75-126.00] vs. 68.50 [54.00-89.75], p=0.001) in the initial upfront combo HSS+LD were found in comparison with the standardized LD.When compared to the standardized LD, the utilization of HSS led to an increase in serum Na+ (137.00 [131.75-140.00] vs. 140.00 [136.00-142.25], p=0.001 for upfront combo HSS, 139.00 [137.00-141.00] vs. 139.00 [136.00-140.00], p=.0470 for standardized LD), while chloride (99.00 [94.00-103.25] vs. 99.00[96.00-103.00], p=0.295), GFR (48.50 [29.75-72.50 vs. 50.00 [35.50-63.50, p=0.616), and creatinine (1.20 [0.90-1.70] vs. 1.20 [1.00-1.50], p=0.218) remained stable in the upfront combo HSS group when compared to standardized LD group (Cl-: 102.00 [99.00-106.00] vs. 98.00 [95.00-103.00], p=0.001, eGFR: 56.00 [41.00-71.00] vs. 55.00 [35.00-71.00], p=0.050, creatinine:1.10 [0.90-1.40] vs. 1.20 [0.90-1.70], p=0.009). Worsening renal function (16.1% vs 35.5%, p=0.007), and length of stay in the hospital (4 days [3-7] vs. 5 days [4-7], p=0.004) were lower in the upfront combo HSS+LD in comparison with the standardized LD. In-hospital mortality, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause mortality were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: HSS as an initial therapy, when combined with LD, may provide a safe and effective diuresis without impairing renal function in ADHF. Therefore, HSS may lead to a shorter length of stay in the hospital for these patients.
FUNDAMENTO: Não houve evidência científica sobre o tratamento inicial com solução salina hipertônica (SSH) na insuficiência cardíaca agudamente descompensada (ICAD). OBJETIVOS: Este estudo avaliou o impacto do uso de SSH junto com um diurético de alça (DA) como o primeiro tratamento diurético para ICAD, com foco na função renal, níveis de eletrólitos e resultados clínicos. MÉTODOS: Neste estudo retrospectivo de caso-controle, 171 pacientes adultos (93 mulheres/78 homens) com ICAD foram incluídos entre 1º de janeiro de 2022 e 31 de dezembro de 2022. Os pacientes foram alocados em dois grupos: combinação inicial de SSH+DA e DA padronizada. O desfecho primário foi piora da função renal (PFR). A hospitalização por IC e a mortalidade por todas as causas foram avaliadas durante 6 meses de acompanhamento. O nível de significância adotado na análise estatística foi de 5%. RESULTADOS: Os grupos exibiram semelhanças nas características basais. Diurese significativamente maior no 1º dia (3975 [3000-5150] vs. 2583 [2000-3250], p=0,001) e natriurese na 2ª hora (116,00 [82,75-126,00] vs. 131,75-140,00] vs. 94,00-103,25] vs. 99,00 [96,00-103,00], p=0,295), TFG (48,50 [29,75-72,50 vs. 50,00[35,50-63,50, p=0,616) e creatinina (1,20 [0,90-1,70] vs. 1,20 [1,00-1,50], p=0,218) permaneceu estável no grupo SSH combinado inicial quando comparado ao grupo DA padronizado (Cl-: 102,00[99,00-106,00] vs. 98,00[95,00-103,00], p=0,001, TFGe: 56,00 [41,00-71,00] vs. 55,00[35,00-71,00], p=0,050, creatinina: 1,10[0,90-1,40] vs. 1,20 [0,90-1,70], p=0,009). A piora da função renal (16,1% vs. 35,5%, p = 0,007) e o tempo de internação hospitalar (4 dias [3-7] vs. 5 dias [4-7], p = 0,004) foram menores na combinação inicial SSH+DA em comparação com o DA padronizado. A mortalidade hospitalar, a hospitalização por IC e a mortalidade por todas as causas foram semelhantes entre os dois grupos. CONCLUSÃO: SSH como terapia inicial, quando combinada com DA, pode proporcionar uma diurese segura e eficaz sem prejudicar a função renal na ICAD. Portanto, a SSH pode levar a um menor tempo de internação hospitalar para esses pacientes.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Feminino , Masculino , Solução Salina Hipertônica/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença Aguda , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio e Potássio/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio e Potássio/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores de Tempo , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Sódio/sangueRESUMO
Resumo Fundamento Não houve evidência científica sobre o tratamento inicial com solução salina hipertônica (SSH) na insuficiência cardíaca agudamente descompensada (ICAD). Objetivos Este estudo avaliou o impacto do uso de SSH junto com um diurético de alça (DA) como o primeiro tratamento diurético para ICAD, com foco na função renal, níveis de eletrólitos e resultados clínicos. Métodos Neste estudo retrospectivo de caso-controle, 171 pacientes adultos (93 mulheres/78 homens) com ICAD foram incluídos entre 1º de janeiro de 2022 e 31 de dezembro de 2022. Os pacientes foram alocados em dois grupos: combinação inicial de SSH+DA e DA padronizada. O desfecho primário foi piora da função renal (PFR). A hospitalização por IC e a mortalidade por todas as causas foram avaliadas durante 6 meses de acompanhamento. O nível de significância adotado na análise estatística foi de 5%. Resultados Os grupos exibiram semelhanças nas características basais. Diurese significativamente maior no 1º dia (3975 [3000-5150] vs. 2583 [2000-3250], p=0,001) e natriurese na 2ª hora (116,00 [82,75-126,00] vs. 131,75-140,00] vs. 94,00-103,25] vs. 99,00 [96,00-103,00], p=0,295), TFG (48,50 [29,75-72,50 vs. 50,00[35,50-63,50, p=0,616) e creatinina (1,20 [0,90-1,70] vs. 1,20 [1,00-1,50], p=0,218) permaneceu estável no grupo SSH combinado inicial quando comparado ao grupo DA padronizado (Cl-: 102,00[99,00-106,00] vs. 98,00[95,00-103,00], p=0,001, TFGe: 56,00 [41,00-71,00] vs. 55,00[35,00-71,00], p=0,050, creatinina: 1,10[0,90-1,40] vs. 1,20 [0,90-1,70], p=0,009). A piora da função renal (16,1% vs. 35,5%, p = 0,007) e o tempo de internação hospitalar (4 dias [3-7] vs. 5 dias [4-7], p = 0,004) foram menores na combinação inicial SSH+DA em comparação com o DA padronizado. A mortalidade hospitalar, a hospitalização por IC e a mortalidade por todas as causas foram semelhantes entre os dois grupos. Conclusão SSH como terapia inicial, quando combinada com DA, pode proporcionar uma diurese segura e eficaz sem prejudicar a função renal na ICAD. Portanto, a SSH pode levar a um menor tempo de internação hospitalar para esses pacientes.
Abstract Background There was no scientific evidence about the initial treatment of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Objectives This study assessed the impact of using HSS along with a loop diuretic (LD) as the first diuretic treatment for ADHF, focusing on renal function, electrolyte levels, and clinical outcomes. Methods In this retrospective case-control study, 171 adult patients (93 females/78 males) with ADHF were included between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Patients were allocated into two groups: upfront combo HSS+LD and standardized LD. The primary endpoint was worsening renal function (WRF). Hospitalization for HF and all-cause mortality were evaluated during 6 months of follow-up. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. Results The groups exhibited similarities in baseline characteristics.A significantly higher diuresis on the 1st day (3975 [3000-5150] vs. 2583 [2000-3250], p=0.001) and natriuresis on the 2nd hour (116.00 [82.75-126.00] vs. 68.50 [54.00-89.75], p=0.001) in the initial upfront combo HSS+LD were found in comparison with the standardized LD.When compared to the standardized LD, the utilization of HSS led to an increase in serum Na+ (137.00 [131.75-140.00] vs. 140.00 [136.00-142.25], p=0.001 for upfront combo HSS, 139.00 [137.00-141.00] vs. 139.00 [136.00-140.00], p=.0470 for standardized LD), while chloride (99.00 [94.00-103.25] vs. 99.00[96.00-103.00], p=0.295), GFR (48.50 [29.75-72.50 vs. 50.00 [35.50-63.50, p=0.616), and creatinine (1.20 [0.90-1.70] vs. 1.20 [1.00-1.50], p=0.218) remained stable in the upfront combo HSS group when compared to standardized LD group (Cl-: 102.00 [99.00-106.00] vs. 98.00 [95.00-103.00], p=0.001, eGFR: 56.00 [41.00-71.00] vs. 55.00 [35.00-71.00], p=0.050, creatinine:1.10 [0.90-1.40] vs. 1.20 [0.90-1.70], p=0.009). Worsening renal function (16.1% vs 35.5%, p=0.007), and length of stay in the hospital (4 days [3-7] vs. 5 days [4-7], p=0.004) were lower in the upfront combo HSS+LD in comparison with the standardized LD. In-hospital mortality, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause mortality were similar between the two groups. Conclusion HSS as an initial therapy, when combined with LD, may provide a safe and effective diuresis without impairing renal function in ADHF. Therefore, HSS may lead to a shorter length of stay in the hospital for these patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Frontal plane QRS-T angle (fQRS-T) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are highly important parameters that well-predict unfavorable outcomes in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI).There are limited data on the predictive significance of ischemic cardiomyopathy (I-CMP) from the combination of fQRS-T and PLR in STEMI, compared to using fQRS-T and PLR alone. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the ability of the combination of fQRS-T and PLR routinely obtained on admission to identify STEMI patients at risk of I-CMP. METHOD: Six hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention between 2018 and 2021 were included. The assessment of I-CMP was conducted through two-dimentional (2D)-echocardiography 6 weeks post-STEMI and I-CMP was defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50% or less. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis were performed to predict the development of I-CMP. RESULTS: In ROC analysis, the cut-off values of fQRS-T and PLR for best predicting I-CMP were 66.72° and 101.23, respectively. The model using the combination of two markers was the most powerful predictor of I-CMP risk (OR: 3.183, 95% CI: 1.971-5.139, p = .001) when included in a single variable such as high fQRS-T or high PLR (OR: 1.422, 95% CI: 0.870-0.232, p = .160). Additionally, the concomitant presence of high fQRS-T and high PLR exhibited the highest specificity (77%) for I-CMP relative to the individual presence of high fQRS-T (66%) or PLR (49%). CONCLUSION: The combination of fQRS-T and PLR, which is a simple and cost-effective risk assessment, may serve as a more reliable prognosticator for I-CMP as opposed to the use of fQRS-T and PLR alone for STEMI.